Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Research Article

Powerful Individuals Behave Less Cooperatively in Common Resource Dilemmas When Treated Unfairly

Published Online:July 02, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000438

Abstract

Abstract. Previous research has suggested that power undermines cooperation in social dilemmas. However, the story may not be so simple. Guided by recent findings that power heightens sensitivity to unfairness, we examined the moderating effect of distributive justice on the association between power and cooperation. Across two experiments, when treated unfairly, high-power (vs. low-power) participants perceived greater unfairness. Moreover, high-power (vs. low-power) participants behaved less cooperatively not only when they interacted with the offender who treated them unfairly (Experiment 1), but also when they interacted with innocent third parties (Experiment 2). However, high-power and low-power participants showed no difference in perceived fairness and cooperation when treated fairly. These findings shed light on the association between power and cooperation by suggesting the modulating role of distributive justice, and they remind us that researchers should take participants’ personal sense of power into account when manipulating fairness.

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. BerkowitzEd., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 994–1014. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026651 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006007 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.543 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, R., González, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Castillo, J. C., Palacios, D., Joignant, A., & Tham, M. (2015). Inequality, distributive justice and political participation: An analysis of the case of Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34, 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12369 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cremer, D. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behaviour in resource allocations as function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.260 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026811 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • DeMartino, B., Camerer, C. F., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 3788–3792. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910230107 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social issues, 31, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diekmann, K. A., Sondak, H., & Barsness, Z. I. (2007). Does fairness matter more to some than to others? The moderating role of workplace status on the relationship between procedural fairness perceptions and job satisfaction. Social Justice Research, 20, 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0036-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Frohlich, N. (2007). A very short history of distributive justice. Social Justice Research, 20, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0039-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012633 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gray, K., Ward, A. F., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Paying it forward: Generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031047 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Guinote, A. (2008). Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012518 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Guinote, A. (2017). How power affects people: Activating, wanting, and goal seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Kanso, R., Hewstone, M., Hawkins, E., Waszczuk, M., & Nobre, A. C. (2014). Power corrupts co-operation: Cognitive and motivational effects in a double EEG paradigm. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss122 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Kopelman, S., Weber, J. M., & Messick, D. M. (2002). Factors influencing cooperation in commons dilemmas: A review of experimental psychological research. In National Research CouncilE. OstromT. DietzN. DolsakP. C. SternS. StonichE. U. WeberEds., The drama of the commons (pp. 113–156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/661 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., Carswell, K. L., vanDellen, M. R., Hofmann, W., … Brown, P. C. (2016). Power and the pursuit of a partner’s goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 840–868. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000048 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Liu, H. H., Hwang, Y. D., Hsieh, M. H., Hsu, Y. F., & Lai, W. S. (2017). Misfortune may be a blessing in disguise: Fairness perception and emotion modulate decision making. Psychophysiology, 54, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12870 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Meindl, J. R. (1989). Managing to be fair: An exploration of values, motives, and leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 252–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989898 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murnighan, J. K., & Wang, L. (2016). The social world as an experimental game. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.02.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Osman, M., Lv, J. Y., & Proulx, M. J. (2018). Can empathy promote cooperation when status and money matter? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2018.1463225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Parks, C. D., Joireman, J., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Cooperation, trust, and antagonism. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 119–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612474436 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Righetti, F., Luchies, L. B., Van Gils, S., Slotter, E. B., Witcher, B., & Kumashiro, M. (2015). The prosocial versus proself power holder: How power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215579054 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Santos, F. P., Pacheco, J. M., Paiva, A., & Santos, F. C. (2017). Structural power and the evolution of collective fairness in social networks. PLoS one, 12, e0175687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175687 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Sawaoka, T., Hughes, B. L., & Ambady, N. (2015). Power heightens sensitivity to unfairness against the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215588755 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Strang, S., Grote, X., Kuss, K., Park, S. Q., & Weber, B. (2016). Generalized negative reciprocity in the dictator game – how to interrupt the chain of unfairness. Scientific Reports, 6, 22316. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22316 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Van Dijk, E., & Cremer, D. D. (2006). Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1352–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206290338 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Langendijk, G., & Anderson, C. (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000260 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verboon, P., & Goslinga, S. (2009). The role of fairness in tax compliance. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 65, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03080136 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weick, M., & Guinote, A. (2008). When subjective experiences matter: Power increases reliance on the ease of retrieval. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 956–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.956 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Zhang, S. W. (2017). Social justice, institutional trust and public cooperation intention. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49, 794–813. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00794 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar