Hypothetical Versus Real Monetary Reward Decrease the Behavioral and Affective Effects in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Abstract
Abstract. A critical question is whether the same decision-making processes underlie task performance with hypothetical and real money as rewards. Across two studies, we administered the Balloon Analogue Risk Task to healthy young adults under these two reward conditions. We found that participants displayed greater risk aversion during trials immediately after the balloon exploded in the previous trial in case the reward was real money, than if the reward was hypothetical money and exhibited greater subjective ratings of regret following losing trials. Moreover, subjective regret ratings after the balloon exploded in the previous trial with real money correlated with risk-taking behavior changes in the current trial, whereas we did not observe this correlation with hypothetical monetary rewards. In addition, when we manipulated the real money amounts to be large or small, participants were more risk averse in the large real money condition compared to the real money amount, whereas we did not observe these differences with varying amounts of hypothetical money.
References
2006). An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Experimental Economics, 9, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-1467-1
(2011). Medial prefrontal cortex and striatum mediate the influence of social comparison on the decision process. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 16044–16049. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100892108
(2009). Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: Fictive and real money gains and losses. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8839–8846. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5319-08.2009
(2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33–47.
(2009). Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 93, 258–262. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.10.023
(2003). Real versus facsimile reinforcers on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 53, 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00111-8
(2010). Human medial orbitofrontal cortex is recruited during experience of imagined as well as real rewards. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 2506–2512. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01030.2009
(1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7–42.
(2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00203
(2014). A universal role of the ventral striatum in reward-based learning: Evidence from human studies. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 114, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2014.05.002
(2011). Is all risk bad? Young adult cigarette smokers fail to take adaptive risk in a laboratory decision-making test. Psychopharmacology, 215, 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2182-y
(2007). Reward-related responses in the human striatum. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104, 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1390.002
(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
(2008). “Feeling more regret than I would have imagined”: Self-report and behavioral evidence. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 449–456.
(2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 709–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014983
(1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Pchological Bulletin, 117, 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
(2008). Personality-dependent dissociation of absolute and relative loss processing in orbitofrontal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1547–1552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06096.x
(2014). Adolescent and adult risk-taking in virtual social contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01476
(2007). When gains loom larger than losses: Reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psychological Science, 18, 1099–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02031.x
(2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects: Comment. American Economic Review, 95, 897–901. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201378
(2010). The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1072–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903276350
(2001). The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician, 55, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001300339897
(1981). Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.197
(2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects: New data without order effects. American Economic Review, 95, 902–912. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805 4201459
(1983). The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4
(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
(2011). Hypothetical and real choice differentially activate common valuation areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1583-10.2011
(2014). Individual differences in risky decision making: A meta-analysis of sensation seeking and impulsivity with the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1784
(2018). Regret-based decision-making style acts as a dispositional factor in risky choices. Psychological Reports. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118786687
(2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.8.2.75
(2016). The neural basis of regret and relief during a sequential risk-taking task. Neuroscience, 327, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.04.018
(2018). Social comparison modulates the neural responses to regret and subsequent risk-taking behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13, 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy066
(2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between-and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.12.4.251
(1999). Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146, 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00005491
(2011). A regret-induced status quo bias. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3320–3327. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5615-10.2011
(2015). Regulatory mode and risk-taking: The mediating role of anticipated regret. PLoS One, 10, e0143147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143147
(2008). Neural correlates of voluntary and involuntary risk taking in the human brain: An fMRI Study of the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART). NeuroImage, 42, 902–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.046
(2012). Status, intertemporal choice, and risk-taking. Econometrica, 80, 1505–1531. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9042
(2014). Impulsivity and risk taking in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology, 39, 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.218
(2014). Alcohol-induced risk taking on the BART mediates alcohol priming. Psychopharmacology, 231, 2273–2280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-013-3377-1
(2015). Paying out one or all trials: A behavioral economic evaluation of payment methods in a prototypical risky decision study. The Psychological Record, 65, 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0112-1
(2019). What you give is what you get: Payment of one randomly selected trial induces risk-aversion and decreases brain responses to monetary feedback. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-00656-1
(1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. The American Economic Review, 72, 923–955.
(1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36, 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
(1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
(2005). Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psychological Review, 112, 862–880. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.862
(2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633
(2013). Assessment of risk-taking and impulsive behaviors: A comparison between three tasks. Social Behavior and Personality, 41, 477–486. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.3.477
(2018). Differential effects of real versus hypothetical monetary reward magnitude on risk-taking behavior and brain activity. Scientific Reports, 8, 3712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21820-0
(2016). Real and hypothetical monetary rewards modulate risk taking in the brain. Scientific Reports, 6, srep29520. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29520
(1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0013
(