Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Grounding medical ethics in philosophy of medicine: problematic and potential

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After considering two of Pellegrino’s papers that address the relation between philosophy of medicine and medical ethics, I identify several overarching problems in his account that revolve around his self-described essentialism and the lack of a systematic attempt to relate clinical medicine to biomedicine and public health. I address these from the critical realist position of Bernard Lonergan, who grounds both metaphysics and ethics on the normative structure of human inquiry and seeks to understand historical development, such as we are witnessing in health science and health care, in terms of the dynamic structure of the human good. I conclude that Lonergan’s generalized empirical method and hierarchical account of world order provide a potentially dynamic framework on which to build a more comprehensive philosophy of medicine than one whose foundations rest primarily on a phenomenology of the clinical encounter and the telos of medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In a work that Pellegrino and Thomasma cite, Dewey says, “Because of this sense of the evanescence and uncertainty of what used to be called ends … [they] are now called values” [6, p. 396].

  2. As I discuss below, Lonergan does not subscribe to essentialist positions in philosophy, but he does draw on Hildebrand’s phenomenological account of feeling with respect to value, which Pellegrino does not discuss.

  3. In his earlier paper, Pellegrino designates these three phenomena as the fact of illness, the act of profession, and the act of medicine [2, pp. 207‒212].

  4. In this way, Lonergan introduces history formally into the realist tradition of Aristotelian-Thomistic philosophy.

  5. See [13] for a full account of clinical reasoning in terms of the structure of cognition and deliberation that I outline here.

  6. GEM is generalized with respect to the common core of operations underlying all human praxis and the data to which investigators attend, which encompass data of consciousness as well as data of sense; it is empirical in that judgments are to be verified in reference to experiential data. By method Lonergan means “a normative pattern of related and recurrent operations that yield ongoing and cumulative results” [16, pp. 135‒139].

  7. Niebuhr [19, p. 56] contrasts the faculty psychology and associationist psychology of the past with the more recent psychology of interaction.

  8. See also [20, pp. 26‒106].

  9. Intentional refers to the orientation of a conscious subject toward an object, not simply to purposeful action.

  10. Organismic (holistic) refers to the functioning of whole organisms; suborganismic refers to part functioning within individual organisms.

  11. From this standpoint, clinical epidemiology as Alvan Feinstein [23] conceived it mediates between clinical medicine and public health.

  12. Psychology, in the present scheme, concerns what goes well and what goes awry at the level of intrapersonal psychic operation. Since individual psychic development and operation fundamentally involves a context of social interaction and formation, mental health science and practice, more broadly conceived, must also take into account the vertical integration that unfolds historically in people’s lives across intrapersonal and interpersonal levels of operation.

References

  1. Pellegrino, Edmund D., and David C. Thomasma. 1993. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pellegrino, Edmund D., and David C. Thomasma. 1981. A philosophical basis of medical practice: Toward a philosophy and ethic of healing professions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pellegrino, Edmund D., and David C. Thomasma. 1988. For the patient’s good: The restoration of beneficence in health care. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pellegrino, Edmund D. 2004. Philosophy of medicine and medical ethics: A phenomenological perspective. In Handbook of bioethics: Taking stock of the field from a philosophical perspective, ed. George Khushf, 183–202. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Lepley, Ray. 1957. The language of value. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Dewey, John. 1929. Experience and nature. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Hildebrand, Dietrich von. 1991. What is philosophy?. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pellegrino, Edmund P. 2001. The internal morality of clinical medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26: 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pellegrino, Edmund D. 2001. Physician and philosopher: The philosophical foundation of medicine: Essays by Dr. Edmund Pellegrino, ed. Roger J. Bulger and John P. McGovern. Charlottesville: Carden Jennings.

  10. Lonergan, Bernard. 1993. The natural desire to see God. In Collection, ed. Frederick E. Crowe and Robert M. Doran, 81‒91. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  11. Lonergan, Bernard. 1993. Insight: Preface to a discussion. In Collection, ed. Frederick E. Crowe and Robert M. Doran, 142‒152. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  12. Temkin, Owsei. 1973. Health and disease. In Dictionary of the history of ideas, vol. 2, ed. Philip P. Weiner, 395–407. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daly, Patrick. 2018. A concise guide to clinical reasoning. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24: 966–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lonergan, Bernard. 1993. Cognitional structure. In Collection, ed. Frederick E. Crowe and Robert M. Doran, 205–221. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  15. Lonergan, Bernard. 2004. The human good. In Philosophical and theological papers 1965‒1980, ed. Robert C. Croken and Robert M. Doran, 332‒351. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 17. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  16. Lonergan, Bernard. 2017. A third collection. Ed. Robert M. Doran and John D. Dadosky. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 16. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  17. Grene, Marjorie. 1979. Comments on Pellegrino’s “anatomy of clinical judgment.” In Clinical judgment: A critical appraisal, ed. H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr., Stuart F. Spicker, and Bernard Towers. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hildebrand, Dietrich von. 1953. Christian ethics. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niebuhr, H. Richard. 1963. The responsible self. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lonergan, Bernard. 1993. Topics in education. In Collected works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 10, ed. Robert M. Doran and Frederick E. Crowe. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lonergan, Bernard. 2017. Method in theology. In Collected works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 14, ed. Robert M. Doran and John D. Dadosky. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daly, Patrick. 2017. An integral approach to health science and healthcare. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38: 15–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feinstein, Alvan R. 1985. Clinical epidemiology: The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Daly.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daly, P. Grounding medical ethics in philosophy of medicine: problematic and potential. Theor Med Bioeth 40, 169–182 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-019-09491-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-019-09491-y

Keywords

Navigation