Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic score matching methods for estimating the average effect of a non-reversible binary time-dependent treatment on the survival function

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In evaluating the benefit of a treatment on survival, it is often of interest to compare post-treatment survival with the survival function that would have been observed in the absence of treatment. In many practical settings, treatment is time-dependent in the sense that subjects typically begin follow-up untreated, with some going on to receive treatment at some later time point. In observational studies, treatment is not assigned at random and, therefore, may depend on various patient characteristics. We have developed semi-parametric matching methods to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) with respect to survival probability and restricted mean survival time. Matching is based on a prognostic score which reflects each patient’s death hazard in the absence of treatment. Specifically, each treated patient is matched with multiple as-yet-untreated patients with similar prognostic scores. The matched sets do not need to be of equal size, since each matched control is weighted in order to preserve risk score balancing across treated and untreated groups. After matching, we estimate the ATT non-parametrically by contrasting pre- and post-treatment weighted Nelson–Aalen survival curves. A closed-form variance is proposed and shown to work well in simulation studies. The proposed methods are applied to national organ transplant registry data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with Discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 34:187–200

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR, (1975) Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62:269–276

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) The analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming TR, Harrington DP (1991) Counting processes and survival analysis. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BB (2008) The prognostic analogue of the propensity score. Biometrics 95(2):481–488

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hernán MA, Brumback B, Robins JM (2000) Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology 11:561–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernán MA, Brumback B, Robins JM (2001) Marginal structural models to estimate the joint causal effect of nonrandomized treatments. J Am Stat Assoc 96:440–448

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hernán MA, Cole SR, Margolick J, Cohen M, Robins JM (2005) Structural accelerated failure time models for survival analysis in studies with time-varying treatments. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 14:477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffding W (1948) A class of statistics with asymptotically normal distributions. Ann Stat 19:293–325

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ (1952) A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc 47:663–685

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 282:457–481

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Schaubel DE, He K (2014) Matching methods for obtaining survival functions to estimate the effect of a time-dependent treatment. Stat Biosci 6:105–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin DY, Ying Z (1994) Semiparametric analysis of the additive risk model. Biometrika 81:61–71

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lok J, Gill R, van der Vaart A, Robins J (2004) Estiamting the causal effect of a time-varying treatment on time-to-event using structural nested failure time models. Stat Neerl 58:271–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu B (2005) Propensity score matching with time-dependent covariates. Biometrics 61:721–728

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen ML, Deeks SG, Martin JN, van der Laan MJ (2007) History-adjusted marginal structural models for estimating time-varying effect modification. Am J Epidemiol 166:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice RL, Breslow NE (1978) Retrospective studies and failure time models. Biometrika 65(1):153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Hernán MA (2008) Estimation of the causal effects of time-varying exposures. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (eds) Advances in longitudinal data analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Rotnitzky A (1992) Recovery of information and adjustment for dependent censoring using surrogate markers. In: Jewell N, Dietz K, Farewell V (eds) AIDS epidemiology—methodological issues. Birkhauser, Boston, pp 297–331

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11:550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubel DE, Cai J (2004) Regression methods for gap time hazard functions of sequentially ordered multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 91(2):291–303

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubel DE, Wolfe RA, Sima CS, Merion RM (2009) Estimating the effect of a time-dependent treatment by levels of an internal time-dependent covariate. J Am Stat Assoc 104:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfling RJ (1980) Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P, Shu X, Schaubel DE, Sung RS, Magee JC (2016) Propensity score-based survival benefit of simultaneous liver-kidney transplant over liver transplant alone for recipients with pretransplant renal dysfunction. Liver Transplant 22:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struthers CA, Kalbfleisch JD (1986) Misspecified proportional hazards mdoels. Biometrika 73(2):363–369

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van der Vaart AW (1998) Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vock DM, Tsiatis AA, Davidian M, Laber EB, Tsuang WM, Finlen-Copeland CA, Palmer SM (2013) Assessing the causal effect of organ transplantation on the distribution of residual lifetime. Biometrics 69(4):820–829

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Schaubel DE (2008) Estimating cumulative treatment effects in the presence of nonproportional hazards. Biometrics 64:724–732

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant R01-DK070869 and by an M-Cubed grant from the University of Michigan. Data analyzed in this report were supplied by the Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation as the contractor for the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. The authors would like to thank the Associate Editor and Referees for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy of or interpretation by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients or the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas E. Schaubel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 77 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, K., Li, Y., Rao, P.S. et al. Prognostic score matching methods for estimating the average effect of a non-reversible binary time-dependent treatment on the survival function. Lifetime Data Anal 26, 451–470 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-019-09485-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-019-09485-x

Keywords

Navigation