Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

External fixators: looking beyond the hardware maze

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

External fixation has a wide variety of orthopedic applications. Although external fixator frames may have a complex appearance, these constructs are formed from several basic components and can be broadly categorized into unilateral, circular, or hybrid designs. The introduction of computer-aided circular external fixation devices (hexapod frames) has simplified the treatment of multiaxial and especially rotational deformities. Serial radiography plays a central role in the evaluation of callus formation (at the level of treated fracture or nonunion as well as the regenerate and docking site with distraction osteogenesis), tailoring the rate and rhythm of distraction during distraction osteogenesis, evaluation of frame complications, and determination of the timing of frame removal. The goals of this article are to review: the components, types, and relevant terminology of external fixator constructs with special emphasis on the Taylor spatial frame, the principles and techniques of distraction osteogenesis, and complications of external fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. The mechanics of external fixation. HSS J. 2007;3(1):13–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moss DP, Tejwani NC. Biomechanics of external fixation: a review of the literature. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2007;65(4):294–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Behrens F. A primer of fixator devices and configurations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lowenberg DW, Githens M, Boone C. Principles of tibial fracture management with circular external fixation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45(2):191–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson JT. Principles of external fixation. In: Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McKee M, McQueen M, Ricci W, Torentta P, editors. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 8th ed, vol. 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins/Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. p. 227–305.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hernigou P. History of external fixation for treatment of fractures. Int Orthop. 2017;41(4):845–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bible JE, Mir HR. External fixation: principles and applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(11):683–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Modi CS, Ho K, Smith CD, Boer R, Turner SM. Dynamic and static external fixation for distal radius fractures—a systematic review. Injury. 2010;41(10):1006–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyazaki AN, Fregoneze M, Santos PD, Silva LA, Junior NG, Checchia SL. Stiff elbow treatment by interposing arthroplasty associated to hinged external fixator. Rev Bras Ortop. 2009;44(4):336–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaffagnini S, Iacono F, Lo Presti M, Di Martino A, Chochlidakis S, Elkin DJ, et al. A new hinged dynamic distractor, for immediate mobilization after knee dislocations: Technical note. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(11):1233–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulkarni GS, Kulkarni VS, Shyam AK, Kulkarni RM, Kulkarni MG, Nayak P. Management of severe extra-articular contracture of the elbow by open arthrolysis and a monolateral hinged external fixator. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2010;92(1):92–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abou Elatta MM, Assal F, Basheer HM, El Morshidy AF, Elglaind SM, Abdalla MA. The use of dynamic external fixation in the treatment of dorsal fracture subluxations and pilon fractures of finger proximal interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017;42(2):182–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nikkhah D, Ruston J, Toft N. Refinements in dynamic external fixation for optimal fracture distraction in pilon-type fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(8):1153–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Augat P, Claes L, Hanselmann KF, Suger G, Fleischmann W. Increase of stability in external fracture fixation by hydroxyapatite-coated bone screws. J Appl Biomater. 1995;6(2):99–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caja VL, Piza G, Navarro A. Hydroxyapatite coating of external fixation pins to decrease axial deformity during tibial lengthening for short stature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-a(8):1527–31.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kloen P. Supercutaneous plating: use of a locking compression plate as an external fixator. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(1):72–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. He X, Zhang J, Li M, Yu Y, Zhu L. Treatment of segmental tibial fractures with supercutaneous plating. Orthopedics. 2014;37(8):e712–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ang BFH, Chen JY, Yew AKS, Chua SK, Chou SM, Chia SL, et al. Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness. Bone Joint Res. 2017;6(4):216–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Behrens F, Johnson W. Unilateral external fixation. Methods to increase and reduce frame stiffness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;241:48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Behrens F, Johnson WD, Koch TW, Kovacevic N. Bending stiffness of unilateral and bilateral fixator frames. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;178:103–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Arazi M, Yalcin H, Tarakcioglu N, Dasci Z, Kutlu A. The effects of dynamization and destabilization of the external fixator on fracture healing: a comparative biomechanical study in dogs. Orthopedics. 2002;25(5):521–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Augat P, Burger J, Schorlemmer S, Henke T, Peraus M, Claes L. Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(6):1011–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Windhagen H, Glockner R, Bail H, Kolbeck S, Raschke M. Stiffness characteristics of composite hybrid external fixators. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:267–76.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Podolsky A, Chao EY. Mechanical performance of Ilizarov circular external fixators in comparison with other external fixators. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;293:61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lowenberg DW, Nork S, Abruzzo FM. Correlation of shear to compression for progressive fracture obliquity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(12):2947–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Metcalfe AJ, Saleh M, Yang L. Techniques for improving stability in oblique fractures treated by circular fixation with particular reference to the sagittal plane. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87(6):868–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pinzur MS. Simple solutions for difficult problems: a beginner’s guide to ring fixation. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13(1):1–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis RA, Lewis DD, Anderson CL, Hudson CC, Coggeshall JD, Iorgulescu AD, et al. Mechanics of supplemental drop wire and half-pin fixation elements in single ring circular external fixator constructs. Vet Surg. 2016;45(4):471–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seide K, Wolter D, Kortmann HR. Fracture reduction and deformity correction with the hexapod Ilizarov fixator. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:186–95.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keshet D, Eidelman M. Clinical utility of the Taylor spatial frame for limb deformities. Orthop Res Rev. 2017;9:51–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. What is the TAYLOR SPATIAL FRAME. http://www.smith-nephew.com/patient/treatments/limb-restoration/what-is-the-taylor-spatial-frame%2D%2D%2D%2D-/. Accessed 4/24/2019.

  32. Naqui SZ, Thiryayi W, Foster A, Tselentakis G, Evans M, Day JB. Correction of simple and complex pediatric deformities using the Taylor-spatial Frame. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(6):640–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fracture Reduction and Deformity Correction Software www.spatialframe.com. https://www.smith-nephew.com/documents/nl-tsf-surgicaltechnique.pdf. 01/20015. Accessed: 5/24/2019.

  34. Wright J, Sabah SA, Patel S, Spence G. The silhouette technique: improving post-operative radiographs for planning of correction with a hexapod external fixator. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2017;12(2):127–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Goodship AE, Watkins PE, Rigby HS, Kenwright J. The role of fixator frame stiffness in the control of fracture healing. An experimental study. J Biomech. 1993;26(9):1027–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cross AR, Lewis DD, Murphy ST, Rigaud S, Madison JB, Kehoe MM, et al. Effects of ring diameter and wire tension on the axial biomechanics of four-ring circular external skeletal fixator constructs. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62(7):1025–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang L, Nayagam S, Saleh M. Stiffness characteristics and inter-fragmentary displacements with different hybrid external fixators. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003;18(2):166–72.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Runyan CM. Flores RL, McCarthy JG. Distraction osteogenesis: biologic and biomechanical principles. In: JG M, editor. Craniofacial distraction. Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 11–43.

  39. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;238:249–81.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;239:263–85.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hamdy RC, Bernstein M, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. What’s new in limb lengthening and deformity correction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(16):1436–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Matsubara H, Tsuchiya H. Treatment of bone tumor using external fixator. J Orthop Sci. 2019;24(1):1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamdy RC, Rendon JS, Tabrizian M). Distraction osteogenesis and its challenges in bone regeneration, bone regeneration, Prof. Haim Tal (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0487-2, InTech; 2012. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/bone-regeneration/distraction-osteogenesis-and-itschallenges-in-bone-regeneration.

  44. Calder PR, Laubscher M, Goodier WD. The role of the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening. Injury. 2017;48(Suppl 1):S52–s8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Codivilla A. The classic: On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. 1905. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(12):2903–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Karp NS, McCarthy JG, Schreiber JS, Sissons HA, Thorne CH. Membranous bone lengthening: a serial histological study. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29(1):2–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vauhkonen M, Peltonen J, Karaharju E, Aalto K, Alitalo I. Collagen synthesis and mineralization in the early phase of distraction bone healing. Bone Miner. 1990;10(3):171–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Percival CJ, Richtsmeier JT. Angiogenesis and intramembranous osteogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2013;242(8):909–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Aronson J, Harp JH Jr. Mechanical considerations in using tensioned wires in a transosseous external fixation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;280:23–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Emara KM, Ghafar KA, Al Kersh MA. Methods to shorten the duration of an external fixator in the management of tibial infections. World J Orthop. 2011;2(9):85–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Forriol F, Iglesias A, Arias M, Aquerreta D, Canadell J. Relationship between radiologic morphology of the bone lengthening formation and its complications. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1999;8(4):292–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Li R, Saleh M, Yang L, Coulton L. Radiographic classification of osteogenesis during bone distraction. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(3):339–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Fischgrund J, Paley D, Suter C. Variables affecting time to bone healing during limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:31–7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rozbruch SR, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov S. Correction of tibial deformity with use of the Ilizarov-Taylor spatial frame. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):156–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kabata T, Tsuchiya H, Sakurakichi K, Yamashiro T, Watanabe K, Tomita K. Reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis for juxta-articular nonunions with bone loss. J Trauma. 2005;58(6):1213–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. D’Hooghe P, Defoort K, Lammens J, Stuyck J. Management of a large post-traumatic skin and bone defect using an Ilizarov frame. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72(2):214–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Panagopoulos GN, Mavrogenis AF, Mauffrey C, Lesensky J, Angelini A, Megaloikonomos PD, et al. Intercalary reconstructions after bone tumor resections: a review of treatments. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27(6):737–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Quinnan SM. Segmental bone loss reconstruction using ring fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(Suppl 5):S42–s6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Papakostidis C, Bhandari M, Giannoudis PV. Distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of long bone defects of the lower limbs: effectiveness, complications and clinical results; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-b(12):1673–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Watson JT. Distraction osteogenesis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(10):S168–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Green SA. Skeletal defects: A comparison of bone grafting and bone transport for segmental skeletal defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:111–7.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Green SA, Jackson JM, Wall DM, Marinow H, Ishkanian J. Management of segmental defects by the Ilizarov intercalary bone transport method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;280:136–42.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Girard PJ, Kuhn KM, Bailey JR, Lynott JA, Mazurek MT. Bone transport combined with locking bridge plate fixation for the treatment of tibial segmental defects: a report of 2 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(9):e220–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lesensky J, Prince DE. Distraction osteogenesis reconstruction of large segmental bone defects after primary tumor resection: pitfalls and benefits. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27(6):715–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Iobst CA, Mohammed W, Colley R. Determining when it is safe to remove the external fixator: results from a survey of the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society. Orthopedics. 2017;40(5):e876–e9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Starr KA, Fillman R, Raney EM. Reliability of radiographic assessment of distraction osteogenesis site. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(1):26–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hazra S, Song HR, Biswal S, Lee SH, Jang KM, Modi HN. Quantitative assessment of mineralization in distraction osteogenesis. Skelet Radiol. 2008;37(9):843–7.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zhao L, Fan Q, Venkatesh KP, Park MS, Song HR. Objective guidelines for removing an external fixator after tibial lengthening using pixel value ratio: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(12):3321–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Saran N, Hamdy RC. DEXA as a predictor of fixator removal in distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(12):2955–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Simpson AH, Kenwright J. Fracture after distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2000;82(5):659–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Danziger MB, Kumar A, DeWeese J. Fractures after femoral lengthening using the Ilizarov method. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15(2):220–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hegab AF, Shuman MA. Distraction osteogenesis of the maxillofacial skeleton: biomechanics and clinical implications. 2012;1:509. https://doi.org/10.4172/scientificreports.509.

  73. Nguyen VD, London J, Cone RO 3rd. Ring sequestrum: radiographic characteristics of skeletal fixation pin-tract osteomyelitis. Radiology. 1986;158(1):129–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kazmers NH, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Prevention of pin site infection in external fixation: a review of the literature. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016;11(2):75–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Dahl MT, Gulli B, Berg T. Complications of limb lengthening. A learning curve. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:10–8.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ward P. Care of skeletal pins: a literature review. Nurs Stand. 1998;12(39):34–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Parameswaran AD, Roberts CS, Seligson D, Voor M. Pin tract infection with contemporary external fixation: how much of a problem? J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(7):503–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Pommer A, Muhr G, David A. Hydroxyapatite-coated Schanz pins in external fixators used for distraction osteogenesis: a randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-a(7):1162–6.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Shyam AK, Singh SU, Modi HN, Song HR, Lee SH, An H. Leg lengthening by distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov apparatus: a novel concept of tibia callus subsidence and its influencing factors. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1753–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Simpson AH, Cunningham JL, Kenwright J. The forces which develop in the tissues during leg lengthening. A clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1996;78(6):979–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Kimia Khalatbari Kani

  2. Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520-8042, USA

    Jack A. Porrino

  3. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA

    Felix S. Chew

Authors
  1. Kimia Khalatbari Kani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jack A. Porrino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felix S. Chew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimia Khalatbari Kani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kani, K.K., Porrino, J.A. & Chew, F.S. External fixators: looking beyond the hardware maze. Skeletal Radiol 49, 359–374 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03306-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03306-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation