Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT-guided transarticular biopsy of the sacroiliac joint: Technique and histomorphological results. A preliminary study

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To introduce and evaluate computed tomography (CT)-guided transarticular needle biopsy of the cartilaginous sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and to assess the biopsy results microscopically.

Materials and methods

The new CT-guided transarticular biopsy of the SIJ was performed in a young corpse and ten patients, two males and eight females aged 18–81 years. All patients had abnormal findings by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the SIJs, including bone marrow edema, related to different types of joint disorders. The biopsies were focused on areas with bone marrow edema. The quality of the specimens obtained, using two different types of biopsy needles, was assessed microscopically.

Results

Biopsies containing cartilage, subchondral plate, and bone marrow from the iliac and sacral sides were obtained from the corpse and three patients and from the iliac bone only in two patients. In three patients, the biopsy needles could not penetrate the bone marrow to the joint facet due to pronounced subchondral sclerosis, but adequate marrow biopsies were obtained. Two biopsies were inadequate, one due to technical problems and one was crushed during preparation. Histological assessment of eight adequate specimens revealed inflammatory bone marrow changes, except in two specimens from females with pronounced sclerosis conforming to osteitis condensans ilii.

Conclusions

Transarticular SIJ biopsies are obtainable and can be directed towards areas with MRI abnormalities. They can be used to confirm inflammatory changes histologically. With the biopsy needles used, severe bone marrow sclerosis may hinder penetration to the cartilage, but bone marrow specimens can be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lambert RG, Bakker PA, van der Heijde D, Weber U, Rudwaleit M, Hermann KG, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(11):1958–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnbak B, Grethe Jurik A, Horslev-Petersen K, Hendricks O, Hermansen LT, Loft AG, et al. Associations between spondyloarthritis features and magnetic resonance imaging findings: a cross-sectional analysis of 1,020 patients with persistent low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2016;68(4):892–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Winter J, de Hooge M, van de Sande M, de Jong H, van Hoeven L, de Koning A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints indicating sacroiliitis according to the assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society definition in healthy individuals, runners, and women with postpartum back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2018;70(7):1042–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber U, Jurik AG, Zejden A, Larsen E, Jorgensen SH, Rufibach K, et al. Frequency and anatomic distribution of magnetic resonance imaging features in the sacroiliac joints of young athletes: exploring "background noise" toward a data-driven definition of sacroiliitis in early spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2018;70(5):736–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun J, Bollow M, Neure L, Seipelt E, Seyrekbasan F, Herbst H, et al. Use of immunohistologic and in situ hybridization techniques in the examination of sacroiliac joint biopsy specimens from patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(4):499–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bollow M, Fischer T, Reisshauer H, Backhaus M, Sieper J, Hamm B, et al. Quantitative analyses of sacroiliac biopsies in spondyloarthropathies: T cells and macrophages predominate in early and active sacroiliitis- cellularity correlates with the degree of enhancement detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59(2):135–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Francois RJ, Gardner DL, Degrave EJ, Bywaters EG. Histopathologic evidence that sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis is not merely enthesitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(9):2011–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Francois RJ, Neure L, Sieper J, Braun J. Immunohistological examination of open sacroiliac biopsies of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: detection of tumour necrosis factor alpha in two patients with early disease and transforming growth factor beta in three more advanced cases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(6):713–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gong Y, Zheng N, Chen SB, Xiao ZY, Wu MY, Liu Y, et al. Ten years’ experience with needle biopsy in the early diagnosis of sacroiliitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(5):1399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng J, Gong Y, Zhang Y, Wang D, Xiao Z. Immunohistological analysis of active sacroiliitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e6605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marzo-Ortega H, O’Connor P, Emery P, McGonagle D. Sacroiliac joint biopsies in early sacroiliitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(7):1210–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui Y, Zhang X, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Zheng J. The relationship between histopathological and imaging features of sacroiliitis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):5904–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG, Boel LW, Vesterby A, Egund N. MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skelet Radiol. 2004;33(1):15–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Egund N, Jurik AG. Anatomy and histology of the sacroiliac joints. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18(3):332–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maksymowych WP, Wichuk S, Chiowchanwisawakit P, Lambert RG, Pedersen SJ. Fat metaplasia and backfill are key intermediaries in the development of sacroiliac joint ankylosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2014;66(11):2958–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KG, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(10):1520–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Diekhoff T, Hermann KG, Greese J, Schwenke C, Poddubnyy D, Hamm B, et al. Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(9):1502–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients for their participation and willingness to publish their data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Grethe Jurik.

Ethics declarations

The study was not externally funded and none of the authors has conflicts of interest to disclose. The CT-guided biopsies were performed as part of a method development project intended for clinical and diagnostic purposes, approved by the institution, and permission from the Ethical Committee was waived. Informed consents for the use of clinical, imaging, and pathological data were obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egund, N., Sørensen, F.B., Østgård, R. et al. CT-guided transarticular biopsy of the sacroiliac joint: Technique and histomorphological results. A preliminary study. Skeletal Radiol 49, 453–460 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03305-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03305-x

Keywords

Navigation