Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Weighted estimation for multivariate shared frailty models for complex surveys

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multivariate frailty models have been used for clustered survival data to characterize the relationship between the hazard of correlated failures/events and exposure variables and covariates. However, these models can introduce serious biases of the estimation for failures from complex surveys that may depend on the sampling design (informative or noninformative). In order to consistently estimate parameters, this paper considers weighting the multivariate frailty model by the inverse of the probability of selection at each stage of sampling. This follows the principle of the pseudolikelihood approach. The estimation is carried out by maximizing the penalized partial and marginal pseudolikelihood functions. The performance of the proposed estimator is assessed through a Monte Carlo simulation study and the 4 waves of data from the 1998–1999 Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Results show that the weighted estimator is consistent and approximately unbiased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen PK, Borgan O, Gill RD, Keiding N (1993) Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Binder CJ (1983) On the variances of asymptotically normal estimators from complex surveys. Int Stat Rev 51:279–292

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88:9–25

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 20:187–220 with discussion

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1975) Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62:269–276

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Green PJ (1987) Penalized likelihood for general semi- parametric regression model. Int Stat Rev 55:245–259

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (2000) Shared frailty models. In: Hougaard P (ed) Analysis of multivariate survival data. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klein JP (1992) Semiparametric estimation of random effects using the Cox model based on the EM algorithm. Biometrics 48:795–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGilchrist CA (1993) REML estimation for survival models with frailty. Biometrics 49:221–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripatti S, Palmgren J (2000) Estimation of multivariate frailty models using penalized partial likelihood. Biometrics 56:1016–1022

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner CJ (1983) Domain means, regression and multivariate analysis. In: Skinner CJ, Holt D, Smith TMF (eds) Analysis of complex surveys. Wiley, Chichester, pp 59–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Therneau TM, Grambsch PM (2000) Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallard E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J. Weighted estimation for multivariate shared frailty models for complex surveys. Lifetime Data Anal 25, 469–479 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-019-09469-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-019-09469-x

Keywords

Navigation