Abstract
Purpose
The cardiovascular endothelium experiences pulsatile and multidirectional fluid wall shear stress (WSS). While the effects of non-physiologic WSS magnitude and pulsatility on cardiovascular function have been studied extensively, the impact of directional abnormalities remains unknown due to the challenge to replicate this characteristic in vitro. To address this gap, this study aimed at designing a bioreactor capable of subjecting cardiovascular tissue to time-varying WSS magnitude and directionality.
Methods
The device consisted of a modified cone-and-plate bioreactor. The cone rotation generates a fluid flow subjecting tissue to desired WSS magnitude, while WSS directionality is achieved by altering the alignment of the tissue relative to the flow at each instant of time. Computational fluid dynamics was used to verify the device ability to replicate the native WSS of the proximal aorta. Cone and tissue mount velocities were determined using an iterative optimization procedure.
Results
Using conditions derived from cone-and-plate theory, the initial simulations yielded root-mean-square errors of 22.8 and 8.4% in WSS magnitude and angle, respectively, between the predicted and the target signals over one cycle, relative to the time-averaged target values. The conditions obtained after two optimization iterations reduced those errors to 3.5 and 0.5%, respectively, and generated 0.2% and 0.01% difference in time-averaged WSS magnitude and angle, respectively, relative to the target waveforms.
Conclusions
A bioreactor capable of generating simultaneously desired time-varying WSS magnitude and directionality was designed and validated computationally. The ability to subject tissue to in vivo-like WSS will provide new insights into cardiovascular mechanobiology and disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins, S., K. Cao, N. M. Rajamannan, and P. Sucosky. Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics induces abnormal medial remodeling in the convexity of porcine ascending aortas. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 13:1209–1225, 2014.
Atkins, S. K., A. McNally, and P. Sucosky. Mechanobiology in cardiovascular disease management: potential strategies and current needs. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 4:79, 2016.
Atkins, S. K., A. Moore, and P. Sucosky. Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics does not promote remodeling in porcine aortic wall concavity. World J. Cardiol. 8:89–97, 2016.
Atkins, S. K., and P. Sucosky. The etiology of bicuspid aortic valve disease: focus on hemodynamics. World J. Cardiol. 12:1227–1233, 2014.
Bissell, M. M., A. T. Hess, L. Biasiolli, S. J. Glaze, M. Loudon, A. Pitcher, A. Davis, B. Prendergast, M. Markl, A. J. Barker, S. Neubauer, G. Saul, and S. G. Myerson. Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 6:499–507, 2013.
Buschmann, M. H., P. Dieterich, N. A. Adams, and H.-J. Schnittler. Analysis of flow in cone-and-plate apparatus with respect to spatial and temporal effects on endothelial cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89:493–502, 2005.
Cao, K., S. K. Atkins, A. McNally, J. Liu, and P. Sucosky. Simulations of morphotype-dependent hemodynamics in non-dilated bicuspid aortic valve aortas. J. Biomech. 50:63–70, 2017.
Cao, K., and P. Sucosky. Effect of bicuspid aortic valve cusp fusion on aorta wall shear stress: preliminary computational assessment and implication for aortic dilation. World J. Cardiovasc. Dis. 5:129–140, 2015.
Cao, K., and P. Sucosky. Computational comparison of regional stress and deformation characteristics in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve leaflets. Int. J. Numer. Method. Biomed. Eng. 33:e02798, 2017.
Caro, C. G., T. J. Pedley, R. C. Schroter, and W. A. Seed. The Mechanics of the Circulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Cecchi, E., C. Giglioli, S. Valente, C. Lazzeri, G. F. Gensini, R. Abbate, and L. Mannini. Role of hemodynamic shear stress in cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 214:249–256, 2011.
Chakraborty, A., S. Chakraborty, V. R. Jala, B. Haribabu, M. K. Sharp, and R. E. Berson. Effects of biaxial oscillatory shear stress on endothelial cell proliferation and morphology. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109:695–707, 2012.
Chien, S. Mechanotransduction and endothelial cell homeostasis: the wisdom of the cell. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 292:H1209–H1224, 2007.
Chung, C. A., M. R. Tzou, and R. W. Ho. Oscillatory flow in a cone-and-plate bioreactor. J. Biomech. Eng. 127:601–610, 2005.
Dai, G., S. Natarajan, Y. Zhang, S. Vaughn, B. R. Blackman, R. D. Kamm, G. Garcia-Cardena, and M. A. Gimbrone, Jr. Distinct endothelial phenotypes evoked by arterial waveforms derived from atherosclerosis-susceptible and -resistant regions of human vasculature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101:14871–14876, 2004.
Davies, P. F. Hemodynamic shear stress and the endothelium in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 6:16–26, 2009.
Dewey, Jr, C. F., S. R. Bussolari, M. A. Gimbrone, and P. F. Davies. The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. J. Biomech. Eng. 103:177–185, 1981.
Dolan, J. M., H. Meng, S. Singh, R. A. Paluch, and J. Kolega. High fluid shear stress and spatial shear stress gradients affect endothelial proliferation, survival, and alignment. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35:1252–1260, 2011.
Fernández Esmerats, J., J. Heath, and H. Jo. Shear-sensitive genes in aortic valve endothelium. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 25:401–414, 2016.
Fewell, M. E., and J. D. Hellums. The secondary flow of Newtonian fluids in cone-and-plate viscometers. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 21:535–565, 1977.
Gonzalez, C. F., Y. I. Cho, H. V. Ortega, and J. Moret. Intracranial aneurysms: flow analysis of their origin and progression. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 13:181–188, 1992.
Harloff, A., A. Nußbaumer, S. Bauer, A. F. Stalder, A. Frydrychowicz, C. Weiller, J. Hennig, and M. Markl. In vivo assessment of wall shear stress in the atherosclerotic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 63:1529–1536, 2010.
Hoehn, D., L. Sun, and P. Sucosky. Role of pathologic shear stress alterations in aortic valve endothelial activation. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 1:165–178, 2010.
Hope, T. A., M. Markl, L. Wigström, M. T. Alley, D. C. Miller, and R. J. Herfkens. Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26:1471–1479, 2007.
Huang, T.-C., C.-K. Chang, C.-H. Liao, and Y.-J. Ho. Quantification of blood flow in internal cerebral artery by optical flow method on digital subtraction angiography in comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. PLoS ONE 8:e54678, 2013.
Humphrey, J. D. D., and C. A. A. Taylor. Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10:221–246, 2008.
Kilner, P. J., G. Z. Yang, R. H. Mohiaddin, D. N. Firmin, and D. B. Longmore. Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 88:2235–2247, 1993.
Kilner, P. J., G. Z. Yang, A. J. Wilkes, R. H. Mohiaddin, D. N. Firmin, and M. H. Yacoub. Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart. Nature 404:759–761, 2000.
Lehoux, S., Y. Castier, and A. Tedgui. Molecular mechanisms of the vascular responses to haemodynamic forces. J. Intern. Med. 259:381–392, 2006.
Lehoux, S., and A. Tedgui. Cellular mechanics and gene expression in blood vessels. J. Biomech. 36:631–643, 2003.
Levesque, M. J., E. A. Sprague, C. J. Schwartz, and R. M. Nerem. The influence of shear stress on cultured vascular endothelial cells: the stress response of an anchorage dependent mammalian cell. Biotechnol. Prog. 5:1, 1989.
Liu, J., J. A. Shar, and P. Sucosky. Wall shear stress directional abnormalities in BAV aortas: toward a new hemodynamic predictor of aortopathy? Front. Physiol. 9:993, 2018.
McNally, A., A. Madan, and P. Sucosky. Morphotype-dependent flow characteristics in bicuspid aortic valve ascending aortas: a benchtop particle image velocimetry study. Front. Physiol. 8:44, 2017.
Mooney M, Ewart RH. The conicylindrical viscometer. Physics 5:350–354, 350, 1934.
Nerem, R. M. Hemodynamics and the vascular endothelium. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 115:510, 1993.
Peiffer, V., S. J. Sherwin, and P. D. Weinberg. Computation in the rabbit aorta of a new metric—the transverse wall shear stress—to quantify the multidirectional character of disturbed blood flow. J. Biomech. 46:2651–2658, 2013.
Pelech, I., and A. H. Shapiro. Flexible disk rotating on a gas film next to a wall. J. Appl. Mech. 31:577–584, 1964.
Sdougos, H. P., S. R. Bussolari, and C. F. Dewey. Secondary flow and turbulence in a cone-and-plate device. J. Fluid Mech. 138:379–404, 1984.
Sucosky, P., K. Balachandran, A. Elhammali, H. Jo, and A. P. Yoganathan. Altered shear stress stimulates upregulation of endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in a BMP-4- and TGF-β1-dependent pathway. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29:254–260, 2009.
Sucosky, P., M. Padala, A. Elhammali, K. Balachandran, H. Jo, and A. P. Yoganathan. Design of an ex vivo culture system to investigate the effects of shear stress on cardiovascular tissue. J. Biomech. Eng. 130:35001–35008, 2008.
Sun, L., S. Chandra, and P. Sucosky. Ex vivo evidence for the contribution of hemodynamic shear stress abnormalities to the early pathogenesis of calcific bicuspid aortic valve disease. PLoS ONE 7:e48843, 2012.
Sun, L., N. M. Rajamannan, and P. Sucosky. Design and validation of a novel bioreactor to subject aortic valve leaflets to side-specific shear stress. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39:2174–2185, 2011.
Sun, L., N. M. Rajamannan, and P. Sucosky. Defining the role of fluid shear stress in the expression of early signaling markers for calcific aortic valve disease. PLoS ONE 8:e84433, 2013.
Sun, L., and P. Sucosky. Bone morphogenetic protein-4 and transforming growth factor-beta1 mechanisms in acute valvular response to supra-physiologic hemodynamic stresses. World J. Cardiol. 7:331–343, 2015.
Suo, J., J. N. Oshinski, and D. P. Giddens. Blood flow patterns in the proximal human coronary arteries: relationship to atherosclerotic plaque occurrence. Mol. Cell. Biomech. 5:9–18, 2008.
Vincent, P. E., A. M. Plata, A. A. E. Hunt, P. D. Weinberg, and S. J. Sherwin. Blood flow in the rabbit aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta. J. R. Soc. Interface 8:1708–1719, 2011.
Wang, C., B. M. Baker, C. S. Chen, and M. A. Schwartz. Endothelial cell sensing of flow direction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 33:2130–2136, 2013.
Wang, C., H. Lu, and M. A. Schwartz. A novel in vitro flow system for changing flow direction on endothelial cells. J. Biomech. 45:1212–1218, 2012.
Yang, Z., H. Yu, G. P. Huang, R. Schwieterman, and B. Ludwig. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of intracranial aneurysms—comparing size and shape. J. Coast. Life Med. 3:245–252, 2015.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially funded by the American Heart Association (Grant-in-Aid 17GRNT33350028), the National Science Foundation (CAREER award 1550144), and the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Wright State University.
Disclosure
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Ajit P. Yoganathan and Hanjoong Jo oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Cornelius, K., Graham, M. et al. Design and Computational Validation of a Novel Bioreactor for Conditioning Vascular Tissue to Time-Varying Multidirectional Fluid Shear Stress. Cardiovasc Eng Tech 10, 531–542 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-019-00426-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-019-00426-1