Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microbiological contamination in donor corneas preserved for medium-term

  • Full Length Paper
  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the characteristics of microbiological contamination in donor corneas preserved for medium-term. A total of 82 donated corneas from June 1, 2014 to November 30, 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The corneas were preserved in cornea chambers medium-term solution at 4–8 °C for keratoplasty. After removal of the central corneas for transplantation, the corneoscleral rims were put back into the medium for 1 month at room temperature (20–25 °C). The suspicious contaminated storage solutions indicated with transparency or color change were examined with bacteria and fungi cultivation for strain identification. The data collected included gender, age, procurement site and causes of death of donors, and follow-up of recipients. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 24.0. Significance level was set at a P value < 0.05. The overall pathogen positive rate was 9.8% (n = 8), including 7 (87.5%) fungi and 1 (12.5%) bacteria. They were 2 (2.44%) Fusarium, 2 (2.44%) Chromomycosis, 1 (1.22%) Candida albicans, 1 (1.22%) Aspergillus versicolor, 1 (1.22%) Acremonium species, and 1 (1.22%) Enterococcus. 5 contaminated corneas were used for penetrating keratoplasty; although four out of five (80%) had not been given antifungal drugs during more than 6 months following-up period, none of the recipients was infected with a graft. Donor age (P = 0.839), gender (P = 0.062), procurement sites (P = 0.713) and cause of death (P = 0.711) had no statistically significant influence on the contamination rate. All donor corneas have a possibility of microbiological contamination. Strict tissue preservation protocol but not antifungal drugs following keratoplasty seems necessary to prevent graft infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borowsky CM, Wallau AD, Reetz A, Kwitko S, Rymer S, Locatelli CI (2008) Positive corneoscleral rim culture in penetrating keratoplasty at the Porto Alegre Clinical Hospital. Arq Bras Oftalmol 71:13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Medical Association Eye Branch Keratology Group (2006) Eye bank access standards. Chin J Ophthalmol 08:693 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Medical Association Ophthalmology Branch Corneal Disease Group, Xie et al (2006) Corneal transplantation access standards. Chin J Ophthalmol 8:753 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila JR, Mian SI (2016) Infectious keratitis after keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27:358–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fan N, Sun J, Xie L et al (2016) Pathogenic bacteria and drug resistance analysis of 1896 conjunctival sac secretions. Lab Med Clin 15:2180–2182 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuest M, Plum W, Salla S, Walter P, Hermel M (2016) Conjunctival and intraocular swabs for the microbiological assessment of donor corneas. Acta Ophthalmol 94:70–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenert AK, Rosenbaum K, Geerling G, Fuchsluger TA (2017) The influence of donor factors on corneal organ culture contamination. Acta Ophthalmol 7:733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong J (2009) Descemet’s stripping automated endothelium keratoplasty. Eye 03:204–207 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khouani M, Debellemaniere G, Malugani C et al (2014) Evaluation of microbial contamination of corneal transplants: one-year report from a French regional eye bank. Cornea 33:899–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kong Q, Zhai H, Cheng J et al (2016) Clinical characteristics of secondary graft fungal infection after corneal transplantation. Chin J Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18(12):751–756 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin IH, Chang YS, Tseng SH, Huang YH (2016) A comparative, retrospective, observational study of the clinical and microbiological profiles of post-penetrating keratoplasty keratitis. Sci Rep 6:32751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Linke SJ, Fricke OH, Eddy M et al (2013) Risk factors for donor cornea contamination: retrospective analysis of 4546 procured corneas in a single eye bank. Cornea 32:141–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant A, Zacks CM, Wilhelmus K, Durand M, Dohlman CH (2001) Candidal endophthalmitis after keratoplasty. Cornea 20:226–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shang X, Zhang M (2010) Body and organ donation in Wuhan, China. Lancet 376:1033–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shi W, Xie L (2014) The status quo and expectation of corneal research in China. Chin J Ophthalmol 50(9):641–645 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vislisel JM, Goins KM, Wagoner MD et al (2017) Incidence and outcomes of positive donor corneoscleral rim fungal cultures after keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 124:36–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie L, Shi W (2007) Cornea disease, vol 4(1). People’s Health Publishing House, Beijing, pp 440–535 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Zhang H, Jiang J et al (2015) Security research of cardiac death donation corneas used as penetrating keratoplasty grafts. Int Eye Sci 02:317–319 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81200661, 81470606, 81570819), the Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2014CFB973), Top ten translational medical research projects from Tongji Hospital (No. 2016ZHYX20). Training Project of young medical pioneers in Wuhan city (No. 2015whzqnyxggrc10).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin-jie Zang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethical committee of Tongji Hospital. Human LNC were isolated and cultured as previously reported. Donor corneas were obtained from the Red Cross Eye Bank of Wuhan City, Tongji Hospital (Hubei, China) and managed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Human and animal ethics rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Gg., Zhu, H., Ji, Cn. et al. Microbiological contamination in donor corneas preserved for medium-term. Cell Tissue Bank 20, 379–387 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-019-09776-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-019-09776-5

Keywords

Navigation