Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Additive Diagnostic Yield of Homozygosity Regions Identified During Chromosomal microarray Testing in Children with Developmental Delay, Dysmorphic Features or Congenital Anomalies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biochemical Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) has emerged as a robust tool for identifying microdeletions and microduplications, termed copy number variants (CNVs). Nevertheless, data regarding its utility in different patient populations with developmental delay (DD), dysmorphic features (DF) and congenital anomalies (CA), is a matter of dense debate. Although regions of homozygosity (ROH) are not diagnostic of a specific condition, they may have pathogenic implications. Certain CNVs and ROH have ethnically specific occurrences and frequencies. We aimed to determine whether CMA testing offers additional diagnostic information over classical cytogenetics for identifying genomic imbalances in a pediatric cohort with idiopathic DD, DF, or CA. One hundred sixty-nine patients were offered cytogenetics and CMA simultaneously for etiological diagnosis of DD (n = 67), DF (n = 52) and CA (n = 50). CMA could identify additional, clinically significant anomalies as compared with cytogenetics. CMA detected 61 CNVs [21 (34.4%) pathogenic CNVs, 37 (60.7%) variants of uncertain clinical significance and 3 (4.9%) benign CNVs] in 44 patients. CMA identified one or more ROH in 116/169 (68.6%) patients. When considering pathogenic CNVs and aneuploidies as positive findings, 9/169 (5.3%) received a genetic diagnosis from cytogenetics, while 25/169 (14.8%) could have a genetic diagnosis from CMA. The identification of ROH was clinically significant in two cases (2/169), thereby, adding 1.2% to the diagnostic yield of CMA (16% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.001). CMA uncovers additional genetic diagnoses over cytogenetics, thereby, offering a much higher diagnostic yield. Our findings convincingly demonstrate the additive diagnostic value of clinically significant ROH identified during CMA testing, highlighting the need for careful clinical interpretation of these ROH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkuraya FS (2010) Homozygosity mapping: one more tool in the clinical geneticist’s toolbox. Genet Med 12(4):236–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia A, Doccini V, Bernardini L, Novelli A, Loddo S, Capalbo A, Filippi T, Carey JC (2013) Confirmation of chromosomal microarray as a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders and dysmorphic features. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 17(6):589–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bi W, Borgan C, Pursley AN, Hixson P, Shaw CA, Bacino CA, Lalani SR, Patel A, Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR, Beaudet AL, Cheung SW (2013) Comparison of chromosome analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis: what is the value of chromosome analysis in today’s genomic array era? Genet Med 15(6):450–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coe BP, Witherspoon K, Rosenfeld JA, van Bon BW, Vulto-van Silfhout AT, Bosco P, Friend KL, Baker C, Buono S, Vissers LE, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers JH, Hoischen A, Pfundt R, Krumm N, Carvill GL, Li D, Amaral D, Brown N, Lockhart PJ, Scheffer IE, Alberti A, Shaw M, Pettinato R, Tervo R, de Leeuw N, Reijnders MR, Torchia BS, Peeters H, O’Roak BJ, Fichera M, Hehir-Kwa JY, Shendure J, Mefford HC, Haan E, Gécz J, de Vries BB, Romano C, Eichler EE (2014) Refining analyses of copy number variation identifies specific genes associated with developmental delay. Nat Genet 46(10):1063–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper GM, Coe BP, Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Vu TH, Baker C, Williams C, Stalker H, Hamid R, Hannig V, Abdel-Hamid H, Bader P, McCracken E, Niyazov D, Leppig K, Thiese H, Hummel M, Alexander N, Gorski J, Kussmann J, Shashi V, Johnson K, Rehder C, Ballif BC, Shaffer LG, Eichler EE (2011) A copy number variation morbidity map of developmental delay. Nat Genet 43(9):838–846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter ME, Miller DT, Harris DJ, Hawley P, Picker J, Roberts AE, Sobeih MM, Irons M (2011) Chromosomal microarray testing influences medical management. Genet Med 13(9):770–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arrigo S, Gavazzi F, Alfei E, Zuffardi O, Montomoli C, Corso B, Buzzi E, Sciacca FL, Bulgheroni S, Riva D, Pantaleoni C (2016) The diagnostic yield of array comparative genomic hybridization is high regardless of severity of intellectual disability/developmental delay in children. J Child Neurol 31(6):691–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Cooper GM, Antonacci F, Siswara P, Itsara A, Vives L, Walsh T, McCarthy SE, Baker C, Mefford HC, Kidd JM, Browning SR, Browning BL, Dickel DE, Levy DL, Ballif BC, Platky K, Farber DM, Gowans GC, Wetherbee JJ, Asamoah A, Weaver DD, Mark PR, Dickerson J, Garg BP, Ellingwood SA, Smith R, Banks VC, Smith W, McDonald MT, Hoo JJ, French BN, Hudson C, Johnson JP, Ozmore JR, Moeschler JB, Surti U, Escobar LF, El-Khechen D, Gorski JL, Kussmann J, Salbert B, Lacassie Y, Biser A, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Deardorff MA, Shaikh TH, Haan E, Friend KL, Fichera M, Romano C, Gécz J, DeLisi LE, Sebat J, King MC, Shaffer LG, Eichler EE (2010) A recurrent 16p12.1 microdeletion supports a two-hit model for severe developmental delay. Nat Genet 42(3):203–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Coe BP, Parikh S, Friedman N, Goldstein A, Filipink RA, McConnell JS, Angle B, Meschino WS, Nezarati MM, Asamoah A, Jackson KE, Gowans GC, Martin JA, Carmany EP, Stockton DW, Schnur RE, Penney LS, Martin DM, Raskin S, Leppig K, Thiese H, Smith R, Aberg E, Niyazov DM, Escobar LF, El-Khechen D, Johnson KD, Lebel RR, Siefkas K, Ball S, Shur N, McGuire M, Brasington CK, Spence JE, Martin LS, Clericuzio C, Ballif BC, Shaffer LG, Eichler EE (2012) Phenotypic heterogeneity of genomic disorders and rare copy-number variants. N Engl J Med 367(14):1321–1331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hehir-Kwa JY, Pfundt R, Veltman JA (2015) Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing for the detection of copy number variation. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 15(8):1023–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson LB, Applegate CD, Wohler E, Sheridan MB, Hoover-Fong J, Batista DA (2014) The impact of chromosomal microarray on clinical management: a retrospective analysis. Genet Med 16(9):657–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstenbach R, van Binsbergen E, Engelen J, Nieuwint A, Polstra A, Poddighe P, Ruivenkamp C, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Smeets D, Poot M (2009) Array analysis and karyotyping: workflow consequences based on a retrospective study of 36,325 patients with idiopathic developmental delay in the Netherlands. Eur J Med Genet 52(4):161–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky EB, Kaul V, Paschall J, Church DM, Bunke B, Kunig D, Moreno-De-Luca D, Moreno-De-Luca A, Mulle JG, Warren ST, Richard G, Compton JG, Fuller AE, Gliem TJ, Huang S, Collinson MN, Beal SJ, Ackley T, Pickering DL, Golden DM, Aston E, Whitby H, Shetty S, Rossi MR, Rudd MK, South ST, Brothman AR, Sanger WG, Iyer RK, Crolla JA, Thorland EC, Aradhya S, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL (2011) An evidence-based approach to establish the functional and clinical significance of copy number variants in intellectual and developmental disabilities. Genet Med 13(9):777–784

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney HM, Kearney JB, Conlin LK (2011a) Diagnostic implications of excessive homozygosity detected by SNP-based microarrays: consanguinity, uniparental disomy, and recessive single-gene mutations. Clin Lab Med 31(4):595–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, Quintero-Rivera F, South ST, Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee (2011b) American College of Medical Genetics Standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med 13(7):680–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kharbanda M, Tolmie J, Joss S (2015) How to use… microarray comparative genomic hybridisation to investigate developmental disorders. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 100(1):24–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning M, Hudgins L, Practice Professional, Committee Guidelines (2010) Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med 12(11):742–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CL, Warburton D (2015) Detection of chromosomal aberrations in clinical practice: from karyotype to genome sequence. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 16:309–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarroll SA, Kuruvilla FG, Korn JM, Cawley S, Nemesh J, Wysoker A, Shapero MH, de Bakker PI, Maller JB, Kirby A, Elliott AL, Parkin M, Hubbell E, Webster T, Mei R, Veitch J, Collins PJ, Handsaker R, Lincoln S, Nizzari M, Blume J, Jones KW, Rava R, Daly MJ, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D (2008) Integrated detection and population-genetic analysis of SNPs and copy number variation. Nat Genet 40(10):1166–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, Schmid M (2016) ISCN 2016: an international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature (2016). In: McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, Schmid M (eds) Reprint of: Cytogenetic and Genome Research, vol 149. Karger, Basel, pp 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, Church DM, Crolla JA, Eichler EE, Epstein CJ, Faucett WA, Feuk L, Friedman JM, Hamosh A, Jackson L, Kaminsky EB, Kok K, Krantz ID, Kuhn RM, Lee C, Ostell JM, Rosenberg C, Scherer SW, Spinner NB, Stavropoulos DJ, Tepperberg JH, Thorland EC, Vermeesch JR, Waggoner DJ, Watson MS, Martin CL, Ledbetter DH (2010) Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 86(5):749–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer E, Speirs H, Taylor PJ, Mullan G, Turner G, Einfeld S, Tonge B, Mowat D (2014) Changing interpretation of chromosomal microarray over time in a community cohort with intellectual disability. Am J Med Genet A 164A(2):377–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papenhausen P, Schwartz S, Risheg H, Keitges E, Gadi I, Burnside RD, Jaswaney V, Pappas J, Pasion R, Friedman K, Tepperberg J (2011) UPD detection using homozygosity profiling with a SNP genotyping microarray. Am J Med Genet A 155A(4):757–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch A, Hoyer J, Guth S, Zweier C, Kraus C, Becker C, Zenker M, Hüffmeier U, Thiel C, Rüschendorf F, Nürnberg P, Reis A, Trautmann U (2006) Diagnostic yield of various genetic approaches in patients with unexplained developmental delay or mental retardation. Am J Med Genet A 140(19):2063–2074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravnan JB, Tepperberg JH, Papenhausen P, Lamb AN, Hedrick J, Eash D, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL (2006) Subtelomere FISH analysis of 11 688 cases: an evaluation of the frequency and pattern of subtelomere rearrangements in individuals with developmental disabilities. J Med Genet 43(6):478–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehder CW, David KL, Hirsch B, Toriello HV, Wilson CM, Kearney HM (2013) American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics: standards and guidelines for documenting suspected consanguinity as an incidental finding of genomic testing. Genet Med 15(2):150–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiff M, Bernhardt BA, Mulchandani S, Soucier D, Cornell D, Pyeritz RE, Spinner NB (2012) “What does it mean?”: uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing. Genet Med 14(2):250–258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee ACMG (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 17(5):405–424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs ER, Church DM, Hanson K, Horner VL, Kaminsky EB, Kuhn RM, Wain KE, Williams ES, Aradhya S, Kearney HM, Ledbetter DH, South ST, Thorland EC, Martin CL (2012) Towards an evidence-based process for the clinical interpretation of copy number variation. Clin Genet 81(5):403–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs ER, Wain KE, Riethmaier D, Smith-Packard B, Faucett WA, Hoppman N, Thorland EC, Patel VC, Miller DT (2014) Chromosomal microarray impacts clinical management. Clin Genet 85(2):147–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JL, Hovanes K, Dasouki M, Manzardo AM, Butler MG (2014) Chromosomal microarray analysis of consecutive individuals with autism spectrum disorders or learning disability presenting for genetic services. Gene 535(1):70–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sagoo GS, Butterworth AS, Sanderson S, Shaw-Smith C, Higgins JP, Burton H (2009) Array CGH in patients with learning disability (mental retardation) and congenital anomalies: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies and 13,926 subjects. Genet Med 11(3):139–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnekenberg RP, Németh AH (2014) Next-generation sequencing in childhood disorders. Arch Dis Child 99(3):284–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer LG, Bejjani BA, Torchia B, Kirkpatrick S, Coppinger J, Ballif BC (2007) The identification of microdeletion syndromes and other chromosome abnormalities: cytogenetic methods of the past, new technologies for the future. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 145C(4):335–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, Flint J, Gingold M, Hirtz D, Majnemer A, Noetzel M, Sheth RD, Quality Academy of Neurology; Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society (2003) Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and The Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 60(3):367–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoukier M, Klein N, Auber B, Wickert J, Schröder J, Zoll B, Burfeind P, Bartels I, Alsat EA, Lingen M, Grzmil P, Schulze S, Keyser J, Weise D, Borchers M, Hobbiebrunken E, Röbl M, Gärtner J, Brockmann K, Zirn B (2013) Array CGH in patients with developmental delay or intellectual disability: are there phenotypic clues to pathogenic copy number variants? Clin Genet 83(1):53–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slavotinek AM (2008) Novel microdeletion syndromes detected by chromosome microarrays. Hum Genet 124(1):1–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets DF (2004) Historical prospective of human cytogenetics: from microscope to microarray. Clin Biochem 37(6):439–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • South ST, Lee C, Lamb AN, Higgins AW, Kearney HM, Working Group for the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee (2013) ACMG Standards and Guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic microarray analysis, including postnatal and prenatal applications: revision 2013. Genet Med 15(11):901–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srebniak MI, Diderich KE, Govaerts LC, Joosten M, Riedijk S, Galjaard RJ, Van Opstal D (2014) Types of array findings detectable in cytogenetic diagnosis: a proposal for a generic classification. Eur J Hum Genet 22(7):856–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner DJ, Miretti M, Rajan D, Fiegler H, Carter NP, Blayney ML, Beck S, Hurles ME (2008) Germline rates of de novo meiotic deletions and duplications causing several genomic disorders. Nat Genet 40(1):90–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallespín E, Palomares Bralo M, Mori MÁ, Martín R, García-Miñaúr S, Fernández L, de Torres ML, García-Santiago F, Mansilla E, Santos F, M-Montaño VE, Crespo MC, Martín S, Martínez-Glez V, Delicado A, Lapunzina P, Nevado J (2013) Customized high resolution CGH-array for clinical diagnosis reveals additional genomic imbalances in previous well-defined pathological samples. Am J Med Genet A 161A(8):1950–1960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Ommen GJ (2005) Frequency of new copy number variation in humans. Nat Genet 37(4):333–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vulto-van Silfhout AT, Hehir-Kwa JY, van Bon BW, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers JH, Meader S, Hellebrekers CJ, Thoonen IJ, de Brouwer AP, Brunner HG, Webber C, Pfundt R, de Leeuw N, de Vries BB (2013) Clinical significance of de novo and inherited copy-number variation. Hum Mutat 34(12):1679–1687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JC, Ross L, Mahon LW, Owen R, Hemmat M, Wang BT, El Naggar M, Kopita KA, Randolph LM, Chase JM, Matas Aguilera MJ, Siles JL, Church JA, Hauser N, Shen JJ, Jones MC, Wierenga KJ, Jiang Z, Haddadin M, Boyar FZ, Anguiano A, Strom CM, Sahoo T (2015) Regions of homozygosity identified by oligonucleotide SNP arrays: evaluating the incidence and clinical utility. Eur J Hum Genet 23(5):663–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson CT, Marques-Bonet T, Sharp AJ, Mefford HC (2014) The genetics of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes: an update. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 15:215–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wincent J, Anderlid BM, Lagerberg M, Nordenskjöld M, Schoumans J (2011) High-resolution molecular karyotyping in patients with developmental delay and/or multiple congenital anomalies in a clinical setting. Clin Genet 79(2):147–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiszniewska J, Bi W, Shaw C, Stankiewicz P, Kang SH, Pursley AN, Lalani S, Hixson P, Gambin T, Tsai CH, Bock HG, Descartes M, Probst FJ, Scaglia F, Beaudet AL, Lupski JR, Eng C, Cheung SW, Bacino C, Patel A (2014) Combined array CGH plus SNP genome analyses in a single assay for optimized clinical testing. Eur J Hum Genet 22(1):79–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zarrei M, MacDonald JR, Merico D, Scherer SW (2015) A copy number variation map of the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 16(3):172–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Abbassia, Cairo, 11566, Egypt

    Mohamed A. M. Ali

  2. Human Cytogenetics Department, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt

    Abdelrahman M. Hassan

  3. Cytogenetics Unit, Al Borg Medical Laboratories, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Mosaab A. Saafan & Adel A. Abdelmagid

Authors
  1. Mohamed A. M. Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdelrahman M. Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mosaab A. Saafan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adel A. Abdelmagid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. M. Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the local ethical committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M.A.M., Hassan, A.M., Saafan, M.A. et al. Additive Diagnostic Yield of Homozygosity Regions Identified During Chromosomal microarray Testing in Children with Developmental Delay, Dysmorphic Features or Congenital Anomalies. Biochem Genet 58, 74–101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-019-09931-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-019-09931-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation