Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A nonparametric lower bound for the number of species shared by multiple communities

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In biological and ecological statistical inference, it is practically useful to provide a lower bound for species richness in a community. Chao (1984, 1989) derived a non-parametric lower bound for species richness in a single community. However, there have been no lower bounds proposed in the literature for the number of species shared by multiple communities. Based on sample species abundance or replicated incidence records from each of the N communities, we derive in this article a nonparametric approach to constructing a lower bound for the number of species shared by N (N≥2) communities. The approach is valid for all types of species abundance distributions (for abundance data) or species detection probabilities (for replicated incidence data). Variance estimators for the proposed lower bounds are obtained by using typical asymptotic theory. Simulation results are reported to examine the performance of the lower bounds. Replicated incidence data of ciliate species collected in three areas from Namibia, southwest Africa, are used for illustration. We also briefly discuss the application of the proposed method to estimate the size of a shared population (i.e., the number of individuals in the intersection of multiple populations) based on capture-recapture data from each population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohannan, B. J. M., and Hughes, J. (2003), “New Approaches to Analyzing Microbial Biodiversity Data,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, 6, 182–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier, T., Nichols, J. D., Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E., and Pollock, K. H. (1998), “Estimating Species Richness: The Importance of Heterogeneity in Species Detectability,” Ecology, 79, 1018–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, J., and Fitzpatrick, M. (1993), “Estimating the Number of Species: A Review,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A. (1984), “Nonparametric Estimation of the Number of Classes in a Population,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11, 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1987), “Estimating the Population Size for Capture-Recapture Data With Unequal Catchability,” Biometrics, 43, 783–791.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1989), “Estimating Population Size for Sparse Data in Capture-Recapture Experiments,” Biometrics, 45, 427–438.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2005), “Species Estimation and Applications,” in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 12 (2nd ed.), eds. N. Balakrishnan, C. B. Read, and B. Vidakovic, New York: Wiley, pp. 7907–7916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., and Shen, T. J. (2003), Program SPADE (Species Prediction And Diversity Estimation), program and user’s guide at http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw.

  • Chao, A., Hwang, W.-H., Chen, Y.-C., and Kuo, C.-Y. (2000), “Estimating the Number of Shared Species in Two Communities,” Statistica Sinica, 10, 227–246.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., Li, P. C., Agatha, S., and Foissner, W. (2006), “A Statistical Approach to Estimate Soil Ciliate Diversity and Distribution Based on Data From Five Continents,” Oikos, 114, 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., Pan, H. Y., and Chiang, S. C. (2008), “The Petersen-Lincoln Estimator and Its Extension to Estimate the Size of a Shared Population,” Biometrical Journal, 50, 957–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., Shen, T.-J., and Hwang, W.-H. (2006), “Application of Laplace’s Boundary-Mode Approximations to Estimate Species and Shared Species Richness,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 48, 117–128.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K. (2004), EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species From Samples, Version 7.5, user’s guide and application published at http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.

  • Colwell, R. K., and Coddington, J. A. (1994), “Estimating Terrestrial Biodiversity Through Extrapolation,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B—Biological Sciences, 345, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., and Williams, C. B. (1943), “The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population,” Journal of Animal Ecology, 12, 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foissner, W. (1999), “Protist Diversity: Estimates of the Near Imponderable,” Protist, 150, 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2006), “Biogeography and Dispersal of Micro-Organisms: A Review Emphasizing Protists,” Acta Protozoologica, 45, 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foissner, W., Agatha, S., and Berger, H. (2002), “Soil Ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) From Namibia (Southwest Africa), With Emphasis on Two Contrasting Environments, the Etosha Region and the Namib Desert,” Denisia, 5, 1–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., Holmes, A. J., Westoby, M., Oliver, I., Brlscoe, D., Dangerfield, M., Gillings, M., and Beattle, A. J. (2004), “Spatial Scaling of Microbial Eukaryote Diversity,” Nature, 432, 747–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, H., Watermann, F., Karez, R., and Berninger, U.-G. (2001), “Differences in Species Richness Patterns Between Unicellular and Multicellular Organisms,” Oecologia, 126, 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. B., Hellmann, J. J., Ricketts, T. H., and Bohannan, B. J. M. (2001), “Counting the Uncountable: Statistical Approaches to Estimating Microbial Diversity,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 4399–4406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. (1957), “On the Relative Abundances of Bird Species,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 43, 193–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E. (2004), Measuring Biological Diversity, Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloss, P. D., and Handelsman, J. (2005), “Introducing DOTUR, a Computer Program for Defining Operational Taxonomic Units and Estimating Species Richness,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 1501–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1982), The Estimation of Animal Abundance (2nd ed.), London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stach, J. E. M., Maldonado, L. A., Masson, D. G., Ward, A. C., Goodfellow, W. M., and Bull, A. T. (2003), “Statistical Approaches for Estimating Actinobacterial Diversity in Marine Sediments,” Applied Environmental Microbiology, 69, 6189–6200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W., Leitner, W., and Rosenzweig, M. L. (1999), WS2m: Software for Estimating Diversity, program and user’s guide at http://eebweb.arizona.edu/diversity.

  • Walther, B. A., and Morand, S. (1998), “Comparative Performance of Species Richness Estimation Methods,” Parasitology, 116, 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. -Y. Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, H.Y., Chao, A. & Foissner, W. A nonparametric lower bound for the number of species shared by multiple communities. JABES 14, 452–468 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1198/jabes.2009.07113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/jabes.2009.07113

Key Words

Navigation