Abstract
Structured meaning-signal mappings, i.e., mappings that preserve neighborhood relationships by associating similar signals with similar meanings, are advantageous in an environment where signals are corrupted by noise and sub-optimal meaning inferences are rewarded as well. The evolution of these mappings, however, cannot be explained within a traditional language evolutionary game scenario in which individuals meet randomly because the evolutionary dynamics is trapped in local maxima that do not reflect the structure of the meaning and signal spaces. Here we use a simple game theoretical model to show analytically that when individuals adopting the same communication code meet more frequently than individuals using different codes—a result of the spatial organization of the population—then advantageous linguistic innovations can spread and take over the population. In addition, we report results of simulations in which an individual can communicate only with its K nearest neighbors and show that the probability that the lineage of a mutant that uses a more efficient communication code becomes fixed decreases exponentially with increasing K. These findings support the mother tongue hypothesis that human language evolved as a communication system used among kin, especially between mothers and offspring.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott B (2000) Fodor and Lepore on meaning similarity and compositionality. J Philos 97:454–455
Allee WC (1931) Animal aggregations. A study in general sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Brighton H, Smith K, Kirby S (2005) Language as an evolutionary system. Phys Life Rev 2:177–226
Cangelosi A (2001) Evolution of communication and language using signals, symbols, and words. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 5:93–101
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1983) Paradox of the evolution of communication and of social interactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:2017–2021
Chomsky N (1972) Language and mind. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York
Churchland PM (1998) Conceptual similarity across sensory and neural diversity: the Fodor/Lepore challenge answered. J Philos 95:5–32
Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B (1999) Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol Evol 14:405–410
Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals: information or manipulation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwel, Oxford, pp 282–309
Deacon TW (1997) The symbolic species. W.W. Norton & Company, New York
de Saussure F (1966) Course in general linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. McGraw-Hill, New York
Dunbar R (1996) Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Eshel I, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1982) Assortement of encounters and evolution of cooperativeness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:1331–1335
Ewens WJ (2004) Mathematical population genetics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Fitch WT (2004) Kin selection and mother tongues: a neglected component in language evolution. In: Oller K, Griebel U (eds) Evolution of communication systems: a comparative approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 275–296
Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge
Fodor J, Lepore E (1999) All at sea in semantic space: Churchland on meaning similarity. J Philos 96:381–403
Fontanari JF, Perlovsky LI (2007) Evolving compositionality in evolutionary language games. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11:758–769
Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Gordon P (2004) Numerical cognition without words: evidence from Amazonia. Science 306:496–499
Hurford JR (1989) Biological evolution of the Saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device. Lingua 77:187–222
Kinzler KD, Dupoux E, Spelke ES (2007) The native language of social cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:12577–12580
Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Michod RE (1995) Eros and evolution: a natural philosophy of sex. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Mitchell M (1996) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge
Nettle D (1999) Linguistic diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Noble J (2000) Cooperation, competition and the evolution of prelinguistic communication. In: Knight C, Studdert-Kennedy M, Hurford J (eds) The evolutionary emergence of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 40–61
Nowak MA, Krakauer DC (1999) The evolution of language. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8028–8033
Nowak MA, Plotkin JB, Krakauer DC (1999) The evolutionary language game. J Theor Biol 200:147–162
Nowak MA, Komarova NL, Niyogi P (2002) Computational and evolutionary aspects of language. Nature 417:611–617
Nowak MA, Sasaki A, Taylor C, Fudenberg D (2004) Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations. Nature 428:646–650
Oliphant M (1996) The dilemma of Saussurean communication. Biosystems 37:31–38
Patriarca M, Leppanen T (2004) Modeling language competition. Phys A 338:296–299
Pawlowitsch C (2007) Finite populations choose an optimal language. Available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/christina.pawlowitsch/4-finite-populations-language-game-2.pdf (Unpublished)
Perlovsky LI (2006) Fuzzy dynamic logic. New Math Nat Comp 2:43–55
Perlovsky LI (2007) Evolution of languages, consciousness, and cultures. IEEE Comput Intell Soc Mag 2:25–39
Petitto LA (1994) Language in the prelinguistic child. In: Bloom P (ed) Language acquisition: core readings. MIT/Bradford Press, Cambridge
Pinker S (1994) The language instinct. Penguin Press, London
Pinker S, Bloom P (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behav Brain Sci 13:707–784
Radick G (2002) Darwin on language and selection. Selection 3:7–16
Reidys CM, Stadler PF (2001) Neutrality in fitness landscapes. Appl Math Comp 117:321-350
Schuster P, Stadler PF (2002) Networks in molecular evolution. Complexity 8:34–42
Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic classification. Science 210:801–803
Smith K, Kirby S, Brighton H (2003) Iterated learning: a framework for the emergence of language. Artif Life 9:371–386
Wright S (1921) Systems of mating. III. Assortative mating based on somatic resemblance. Genetics 6:144–161
Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214
Zahavi A (1993) The fallacy of conventional signalling. Proc R Soc Lond B 340:227–230
Zuidema W (2003) Optimal communication in a noisy and heterogeneous environment. Lect Notes Artif Intell 2801:53–563
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Material Command, USAF, under grant number FA9550-06-1-0202, and in part by CNPq and FAPESP, Project No. 04/06156-3. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purpose notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fontanari, J.F., Perlovsky, L.I. A game theoretical approach to the evolution of structured communication codes. Theory Biosci. 127, 205–214 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-008-0024-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-008-0024-1