Lee Lichtenstein
Abstract
Virtual environments (VEs) allow safe, repeatable, and controlled evaluations of obstacle avoidance and navigation performance of people with visual impairments using visual aids. Proper simulation of mobility in a VE requires an interface, which allows subjects to set their walking pace. Using conventional treadmills, the subject can change their walking speed by pushing the tread with their feet, while leveraging handrails or ropes (self-propelled mode). We developed a feedback-controlled locomotion interface that allows the VE workstation to control the speed of the treadmill, based on the position of the user. The position and speed information is also used to implement automated safety measures, so that the treadmill can be halted in case of erratic behavior.
We compared the feedback-controlled to the self-propelled mode by using speed-matching tasks (follow a moving object or match the speed of an independently moving scene) to measure the efficacy of each mode in maintaining constant subject position, subject control of the treadmill, and subject pulse rates. In addition, we measured the perception of speed in the VE on each mode.
The feedback-controlled mode required less physical exertion than self-propelled. The average position of subjects on the feedback-controlled treadmill was always within a centimeter of the desired position. There was a smaller standard deviation in subject position when using the self-propelled mode than when using the feedback-controlled mode, but the difference averaged less than 6 cm across all subjects walking at a constant speed. Although all subjects underestimated the speed of an independently moving scene at higher speeds, their estimates were more accurate when using the feedback-controlled treadmill than the self-propelled.
- Apfelbaum, H., Pelah, A., and Peli, E. 2007. Heading assessment by “tunnel vision” patients and control subjects standing or walking in a virtual reality environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 4, 1, Article 8, 1--16. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bakdash, J. Z., Augustyn, J. S., and Proffitt, D. R. 2005. Effects of effort and reduced visual cue information on perceived walking speed (abstract). Journal of Vision 5, 8, 747a.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Banton, T., Stefanucci, J., Durgin, F. H., Fass, A. M., and Profitt, D. 2005. The perception of walking speed in virtual environments. Presence 14, 4, 394--406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barabas, J., Woods, R. L., Goldstein, R. B., and Peli, E. 2004a. Perception of collisions while walking in a virtual environment with simulated peripheral vision loss (abstract). Journal of Vision 4, 8, 806a.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barabas, J., Goldstein, R., Apfelbaum, H., Woods, R. L., Giorgi, R., and Peli, E. 2004b. Tracking the line of primary gaze in a walking simulator: modeling and calibration. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36, 4, 757--770.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bardy, B. G., Warren, W. H., Jr., and Kay, B. A. 1999. The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control during walking. Percept. Psychophy 61, 7, 1356--1368.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chaudhury, S., Eisinger, J. M., Hao, L., Hicks, J., Chivukula, R., and Turano, K. A. 2004. Visual illusion in virtual world alters women's target-directed walking. Expe. Brain Res. 159, 360--369.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cutting, J. E., Vishton, P. M., and Braren, P. A. 1995. How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving obstacles. Psychol. Rev. 102, 4, 627--651.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cutting, J. E., Readinger, W. O., and Wang, R. F. 2002. Walking, looking to the side, and taking curved paths. Percept Psychophys 64, 3, 415--425.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Darken, R. P., Cockayne, W. R., and Carmein, D. 1997. The Omni-Directional Treadmill: a locomotion device for virtual worlds. in User Interface Software and Technology '97, Banff, Canada. 213--221. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Distler, H. K., Pelah, A., Bell, A. G., and Thurrell, A. E. I. 1998. The perception of absolute speed during self-motion (abstract). Perception 27s, 139.Google Scholar
- Durgin, F. H., Gigone, K., and Scott, R. 2005a. Perception of visual speed while moving. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum Percept. Perform. 31, 339--353.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Durgin, F. H., Pelah, A., Fox, L. F., Lewis, J., Kane, R., and Walley, K. A. 2005b. Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: More than meets the eye. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum Percept. Perform. 31, 398--419.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fajen, B. R. and Warren, W. H. 2003. Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29, 2, 343--362.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fajen, B. R. and Warren, W. H. 2004. Visual guidance of intercepting a moving target on foot. Perception 33, 689--715.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Foo, P., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A., and Tarr, M. J. 2005. Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map-versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 2, 195--215.Google Scholar
- Gottlieb, D. D., Freeman, P., and Williams, M. 1992. Clinical research and statistical analysis of a visual field awareness system. J. Am. Optom. Assoc. 63, 8, 581--588.Google Scholar
- Harris, L. R., Jenkin, M., and Zikovitz, D. C. 2000. Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self motion. Exp. Brain. Res. 2000, 135, 12--21.Google Scholar
- Hollerbach, J. M., Xu, Y., Christensen, R., and Jacobsen, S. C. 2000. Design specifications for the second generation Sarcos Treadport locomotion interface. In Haptics Symposium, Proc ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, Orlando, DSC-Vol. 69--72, 1293--1298.Google Scholar
- Iwata, H. 1999a. Locomotion interface for virtual environments. In Robotics Research: The 9th International Symposium, Snowbird, UT, Springer-Verlag, New York. 220--226.Google Scholar
- Iwata, H. 1999b. Walking about virtual environments on an infinite floor. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality '99, Houston, TX. 286--293. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Knapp, C. H. and Carter, G. C. 1976. The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 24, 4, 320--327.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, L. and Warren, W. H. 2000. Perception of heading during rotation: sufficiency of dense motion parallax and reference objects. Vision Research 40, 28, 3873--3894.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lichtenstein, L., Barabas, J., Woods, R. L., and Peli, E. 2006. Maintaining position and display perspective in a walking simulator while self-pacing on a treadmill. In SID International Symposium, San Francisco, CA. vol. 37. 295--298.Google Scholar
- Loomis, J. M. 1992. Presence and distal attribution: phenomenology, determinants, and assessment. In Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III/Human Perception, Performance, and Presence in Virtual Environments, San Jose, CA, The International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE), 1666. 590--595.Google Scholar
- Loomis, J. M. and Knapp, J. M. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Virtual and Adaptive Environments, J. Hettinger, and M. W. Haas, Eds. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 21--46.Google Scholar
- Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., and Fukusima, S. S. 1992. Visual space perception and visually directed action. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 4, 906--921.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Minetti, A. E., Boldrini, L., Brusamolin, L., Zamparo, P., and Mckee, T. 2003. A feedback-controlled treadmill (treadmill-on-demand) and the spontaneous speed of walking and running in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology 95, 2, 838--843.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moore, D. S. and Mccabe, G. P. 1999. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- Murray, M. P., Spurr, G. B., Sepic, S. B., Gardner, G. M., and Mollinger, L. A. 1985. Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. J. Appl. Physiol. 59, 1, 87--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nise, N. S. 2004. Control Systems Engineering. Wiley, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peli, E. 2000a. Field expansion for homonymous hemianopia by optically-induced peripheral exotropia. Optometry and Visual Science 77, 9, 453--464.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peli, E. 2000b. Augmented vision for central scotoma and peripheral field loss. In C., Stuen, A., Arditi, A., Horowitz, M. A., Lang, B., Rosenthal, and K. Seidman, Eds. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse. 70--74.Google Scholar
- Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., and Epstein, W. 2003. The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychol. Sci. 14, 2, 106--112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prokop, T., Schubert, M., and Berger, W. 1997. Visual influence on human locomotion. Exp. Brain. Res. 1997, 114, 63--70.Google Scholar
- Rizzo, M., Fisher, D., Andersen, J., and Van Winsum, W. 2005. CARSS Coordinated Assessment of Roadway Simulator Scenarios, Simulator Users Group, Division of Neuroergonomics, Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Retrieved August 31, 2006 from http://www.uiowa.edu/~neuroerg/Simulator%20Users%20Group/carss%20scenarios%205%2018%2005.pdf.Google Scholar
- Schubert, M., Prokop, T., Brocke, F., and Berger, W. 2005. Visual kinesthesia and locomotion in Parkinson's Disease. Movement Disorders 20, 2, 141--150.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Soong, G. P., Lovie-Kitchin, J. E., and Brown, B. 2004. Measurements of preferred walking speed in subjects with central and peripheral vision loss. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 24, 291--295.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thurrell, A. E. I., Pelah, A., and Distler, H. K. 1998. The influence of non-visual signals of walking on the perceived speed of optic flow (abstract). Perception 27s, 147.Google Scholar
- Wann, J. P., Swapp, D., and Rushton, S. K. 2000. Heading perception and the allocation of attention. Vision Research 40, 2533--2543.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wells, M., Peterson, B., and Aten, J. 1996. The virtual motion controller: a sufficient-motion walking simulator. In Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (IEEE '97), Albuquerque, NM. 1--8.Google Scholar
- Willemsen, P. and Gooch, A. A. 2002. An experimental comparison of perceived egocentric distance in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments using direct walking tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2002 (VR '02). 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Witmer, B. G. and Kline, P. B. 1998. Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence 7, 2, 144--167. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Woods, R., Shieh, J., Bobrow, L., Vora, A., Barabas, J., Goldstein, R., and Peli, E. 2003. Perceived collision with an obstacle in a virtual environment (abstract). Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO CD). Item 4321Google Scholar
- Woods, R. L., Mandel, A. J., Barabas, J., Goldstein, R. B., and Peli, E. 2005. Making virtual reality more real and the perception of potential collisions (abstract). Journal of Vision 4, 8, 814--814.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woodway. 2004. Woodway USA Treadmill Control Protocol (RS-232 Protocol, RS-232 port on the Display Board), Waukesha.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A feedback-controlled interface for treadmill locomotion in virtual environments
Recommendations
CyberWalk: Enabling unconstrained omnidirectional walking through virtual environments
Despite many recent developments in virtual reality, an effective locomotion interface which allows for normal walking through large virtual environments was until recently still lacking. Here, we describe the new CyberWalk omnidirectional treadmill ...
The Efficacy of State of the Art Overground Gait Rehabilitation Robotics
To date, rehabilitation robotics has come a long way effectively aiding the rehabilitation process of the patients suffering from paraplegia or hemiplegia due to spinal cord injury (SCI) or stroke respectively, through partial or even full functional ...
Feedback-controlled locomotion in virtual environments
NordiCHI '08: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridgesIn this work we propose an extension of our laboratory evaluation framework [1] equipped with a virtual environment (VE). In order to simulate ecologically valid walking in the VE, we evaluate biomechanical processes in gait to control the speed of the ...
Comments