A hierarchical state space approach to affective dynamics
Introduction
The role affect and emotions play in our daily life can hardly be overestimated. Affect and emotions produce the highs and lows of our lives. We are happy when a paper gets accepted, we are angry if a colleague intentionally spreads gossip about us and we feel guilty when we cross a deadline for a review. For some people, their affect is a continuous source of trouble because they suffer from affective disorders, such as a specific phobia or depression.
As for any aspect of human behavior, emotions are extremely complex phenomena, for several reasons. First, they are multicomponential, consisting of experiential, physiological and behavioral components (Gross, 2002). If you are afraid when walking alone on a deserted street late at night, this may lead to bodily effects such as heart palpitations but also to misperceptions of stimuli in the environment and a tendency to walk faster. Second, an emotion fluctuates over time. Without going into the muddy waters of what the exact definition of an emotion is (see Bradley & Lang, 2007), it is clear that emotions function to signal relevant events for our goals (Oatley & Jenkins, 1992). Because of their communicative function, emotions have a clear temporal component (see e.g.,Frijda, Mesquita, Sonnemans, & Van Goozen, 1991) and therefore a genuine understanding of emotions implies an understanding of their underlying dynamics. Third, emotional reactions are subject to contextual and individual differences (see e.g., Barrett et al., 2007, Kuppens et al., 2009).
These complicating factors make the study of affective dynamics a challenging research domain, which requires an understanding of the complex interplay between the different emotion components across time, context and individual differences (Scherer, 2000, Scherer, 2009). Despite its importance and complexity, research on emotion dynamics is still in its infancy (Scherer, 2000). Aside from the lack of a definite theoretical understanding of affective phenomena, a large part of the reason for this lies in the complexity of the data involved in such an enterprise. For instance, because of the prominent physiological component of affect, biological signal processing techniques are required and these are typically not part of the psychology curriculum. On the other hand, the existing methods, traditionally developed and studied in the engineering science, are not directly applicable. As we explain below, we believe one of the major bottlenecks is the existence of individual differences. Indeed, as noted by Davidson (1998), one of the most striking features of emotions is the presence of significant individual differences in almost all aspects involved in their elicitation and control. Incorporating such differences is therefore crucial, not only to account fully for the entire range of emotion dynamics across individuals, but also for studying the differences between individuals characterized by adaptive or maladaptive emotional functioning.
As an example, let us introduce the data that will be discussed and investigated below. Two groups of adolescents (one with Major Depressive Disorder and the other without any emotional or behavioral problems) engaged in an interaction task with their parents during a few minutes in which they discussed and tried to resolve a topic of conflict. During the task, several physiological measures were recorded from the adolescent. Moreover, the behavior of the adolescent and parents was observed and micro-socially coded. All measures were obtained on a second-to-second basis. Several possible research questions are: In what way do the physiological dynamics differ between depressed adolescents and healthy controls (hereafter referred to as normals)? What is the effect of the display of angry behavior by a parent on the affective physiology observed in the adolescent, and is this effect different for depressed and normal adolescents?
A powerful modeling framework that is capable for addressing the above questions is provided by state space modeling. State space models will be explained in detail in the next section, but for now it suffices to say that they have been developed to model the dynamics of a system from measured inputs and outputs using latent states. Usually, it is a single system that is being studied. However, in the particular example in this paper there are as many systems as participants. Because a single state space is already a complex model for statistical inference, studying several of these state space models simultaneously is a daunting task. However, in the present paper we offer a solution to this problem by incorporating state space models in a hierarchical Bayesian framework, which allows one to study multiple systems (e.g., individuals) simultaneously, and thus allows one to make inferences about differences between individuals in terms of their affective dynamics. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods make the task of statistical inference for such hierarchical models more digestible and the Bayesian approach lets us summarize the most important findings in a straightforward way.
In sum, the goal of this paper is to introduce a hierarchical state space framework allowing us to study individual differences in the dynamics of the affective system. The outline of the paper is as follows. In the next section, we introduce a particular state space model, the linear Gaussian state space model, and extend it to a hierarchical model. In subsequent section, we illustrate the framework by applying it to data consisting of cardiovascular and behavioral measures that were taken during the interaction study introduced above. By focusing on various aspects of the model, we will show how our approach allows us to explore several research questions and address specific hypotheses that are discussed in the literature on the physiology and dynamics of emotions. Finally, the discussion reviews the strengths and limitations of the model, and we make some suggestions for future developments.
Section snippets
Hierarchical state space modeling
We will present a model for the affective dynamics of a single person and then extend this model hierarchically: The basic model structure for each person’s dynamics will be of the same type, and the hierarchical nature of the model allows for the key parameters of the model to differ across individuals.
The single individual’s model will be a linear dynamical systems model, cast in the state space framework. In the next paragraphs, the key concepts will be explained verbally and in the next
Application to emotional psychophysiology
We will now apply the presented hierarchical state space model to the data that reflect the affective physiological changes in depressed and non-depressed adolescents during conflictual interactions with their parents (Sheeber, Davis, Leve, Hops, & Tildesley, 2007). The study was carried out with adolescents because mood disorders often emerge for the first time during this stage of life (Allen & Sheeber, 2008). Depression, cardiovascular physiology and affective dynamics form a three-node
Discussion
In this paper, we introduced a hierarchical extension for the linear Gaussian state space model. The extended model proved to be very useful when studying individual differences in the dynamics of emotional systems. Applying it to the Oregon adolescent interaction data led to interesting discussions about hypotheses on the relations between cardiovascular processes, emotion dynamics and depression. On the whole, it was clear that applying the hierarchical state space approach to these data
References (79)
- et al.
A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder
Clinical Psychology Review
(2008) - et al.
The relationships among heart rate variability, inflammatory markers and depression in coronary heart disease patients
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
(2009) - et al.
Depression symptoms predict heart rate recovery after treadmill stress testing
American Heart Journal
(2006) - et al.
The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis
(2007) - et al.
Cardiac regulation and depression
Journal of Psychiatric Research
(1987) - et al.
Hierarchical models of simple mechanisms underlying confidence in decision making
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
(2011) - et al.
Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
(2011) - et al.
Hierarchical single- and dual-process models of recognition memory
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
(2011) - et al.
The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives
Psychological Bulletin
(2003) - et al.
Adolescent emotional development and the emergence of depressive disorders
(2008)
The experience of emotion
Annual Review of Psychology
Pattern recognition and machine learning
Differential equations: a modeling perspective
The association of psychosocial factors and depression with hypertension among older adults
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Emotion and motivation
Depression, the autonomic nervous system, and coronary heart disease
Psychosomatic Medicine
On Gibbs sampling for state space models
Biometrika
Explaining the Gibbs sampler
The American Statistician
Differentiating orienting, startle, and defense responses: the role of affect and its implications for psychopathology
The expression of the emotions in man and animals
Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience
Cognition & Emotion
Do depression symptoms predict early hypertension incidence in young adults in the CARDIA study?
Archives of Internal Medicine
Autonomic correlates of depression and clinical improvement following electroconvulsive shock therapy
Psychophysiology
Time series analysis by state space methods
The duration of affective phenomena or emotions, sentiments and passions
Insomnia and sleep duration as mediators of the relationship between depression and hypertension incidence
American Journal of Hypertension
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Bayesian data analysis
Markovchain Monte Carlo in practice
Kalman filtering: theory and practice using MATLAB
Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive and social consequences
Psychophysiology
Major depression: an illness with objective physical signs
World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Time series analysis
Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses
Methodological issues in direct observation—illustrations with the living in familial environments (LIFE) coding system
Journal of Clinical Child Psychology
Are symptoms of anxiety and depression risk factors for hypertension? Longitudinal evidence from the national health and nutrition examination survey I epidemiologic follow-up study
Archives of Family Medicine
A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems
Journal of Basic Engineering
State–space models with regime switching
Cited by (50)
Bayesian brain: Can we model emotion?
2021, EncephaleMean field dynamics of stochastic cellular automata for random and small-world graphs
2020, Journal of Mathematical PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Describing the dynamics of mood has been the focus of many recent studies. A popular choice has been linear stochastic differential equations (e.g., Ebner-Priemer et al., 2015; Lodewyckx, Tuerlinckx, Kuppens, Allen, & Sheeber, 2011; Oravecz, Tuerlinckx, & Vandekerckhove, 2011 continuous and discretised). In these models a linear, latent state space model explains the changes in observations over time and allows to determine convergence to some stable state.
Foundations of idiographic methods in psychology and applications for psychotherapy
2019, Clinical Psychology ReviewCitation Excerpt :DSEM, unlike multilevel VAR, uses a Bayesian estimation method. Interested readers may wish to examine related work for additional details (Lodewyckx, Tuerlinckx, Kuppens, Allen, & Sheeber, 2011; Schuurman, Ferrer, & Hamaker, 2016; Song & Ferrer, 2012). Other than estimation methods, these multi-level methods primarily differ on the assumptions regarding the structure of the variables (i.e., observed versus latent).
Multimodal, Idiographic Ambulatory Sensing Will Transform our Understanding of Emotion
2023, Affective ScienceDriver State Modeling Through Latent Variable State Space Framework in the Wild
2023, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems