Agrammatic aphasic production and comprehension of unaccusative verbs in sentence contexts
Section snippets
Subjects
Aphasic subjects. Eight English-speaking agrammatic aphasic subjects (two females and six males; mean age=58.8 years) participated in the study. They were recruited from the subject pool of the Northwestern University Aphasia and Neurolinguistics Research Laboratory. All subjects were right-handed, with the exception of two males, and had at least a high-school education (mean=17 years). None of the subjects had a history of prior neurological disease, drug or alcohol abuse, psychiatric
Results
Mean percentage correct performance of subjects on comprehension and production tasks is shown in Table 2. A repeated measures three-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the two tasks and between the two sentence types: subjects performed better on the comprehension task than on the production task (F(1,11)=11.562, p=0.006). They also showed better performance on unergative sentences than on unaccusatives (F(1,11)=11.957, p=0.005). There were also significant interaction effects
Discussion
Results from this study examining production of intransitive verbs in sentences were consistent with previous studies by Thompson, 2003, Kegl, 1995 showing that unaccusative intransitive verbs are selectively disrupted in agrammatic aphasic subjects. Specifically, as with single verbs, sentences involving unaccusative verbs presented production difficulty for agrammatic aphasic subjects, while those involving unergatives did not. This finding supports Kegl's Syntactically Enriched Verb Entry
Conclusion
Results of this study provide further evidence that agrammatic aphasic subjects have selective impairment in production of verbs, and that the complexity of the verbs' argument structure accounts for the impoverished sentence production observed in these subjects. Unaccusative verbs have a more complex argument structure than unergative verbs in terms of the type of argument, and thus present agrammatic subjects with more difficulty in sentence production. This difficulty, however, does not
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Institute of Health grant DCo 1948. The authors acknowledge Mike Dickey, Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah, Steven Fix and Naomi Hashimoto for their assistance with data collection and analysis. We also thank William O’ Grady for his insightful comments on the earlier versions of this work. Our special thanks go to all individuals with aphasia who participated in this study.
References (34)
- et al.
Psychological verbs and the double-dependency hypothesis
Brain and Cognition
(2001) - et al.
Acquisition and loss of nouns and verbs: parallel or divergent patterns?
Journal of Neurolinguistics
(2003) Trace deletion, θ-roles and cognitive strategies
Brain and Language
(1995)Levels of representation and units of access relevant to agrammatism
Brain and Language
(1995)- et al.
Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 1. Analysis of stimulus, lexical, and conceptual factors
Brain and Language
(2000) - et al.
Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: implications for lexical organization
Brain and Language
(2000) - et al.
The position of subjects
Lingua
(1991) - et al.
On the basis for the agrammatic's difficulty in producing main verbs
Cortex
(1984) Canonicity in Broca's sentence comprehension: the case of psychological verbs
Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: the argument structure complexity hypothesis
Journal of Neurolinguistics
(2003)