Skip to main content
Log in

Combining microsatellite and pedigree data to estimate relationships among Skyros ponies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relationship coefficients are particularly useful to improve genetic management of endangered populations. These coefficients are traditionally based on pedigree data, but in case of incomplete or inexistent pedigrees they are replaced by coefficients calculated from molecular data. The main objective of this study was to develop a new method to estimate relationship coefficients by combining molecular with pedigree data, which is useful for specific situations where neither pedigree nor molecular data are complete. The developed method was applied to contribute to the conservation of the Skyros pony breed, which consists of less than 200 individuals, divided into 3 main herds or subpopulations. In this study, relationships between individuals were estimated using traditional estimators as well as the newly developed method. For this purpose, 99 Skyros ponies were genotyped at 16 microsatellite loci. It appeared that the limitation of the most common molecular-based estimators is the use of weights that assume relationships equal to 0. The results showed that, as a consequence of this limitation, negative relationship values can be obtained in small inbred populations, for example. By contrast, the combined estimator gave no negative values. Using principal component analysis, the combined estimator also enabled a better graphic differentiation between the 3 subpopulations defined previously. In conclusion, this new estimator can be a promising alternative to traditionally used estimators, especially in inbred populations, with both incomplete pedigree and molecular information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumung R, Sölkner J, 2003. Pedigree and marker information requirements to monitor genetic variability. Genet Sel Evol 35: 369–383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boichard D, Maignel L, Verrier E, 1996. Analyse généalogique des races bovines françaises. INRA Prod Anim 9: 323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bömcke E, 2007. Conservation of animal genetic resources: Improvement of the relationship matrix. Master, Gembloux Agricultural University, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW, 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314–331.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero A, Toro MA, 2000. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet Res 75: 331–343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero A, Toro MA, 2002. Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations. Conserv Genet 3: 289–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Csilléry K, Johnson T, Beraldi D, Cletton-Brock T, Coltman D, Hansson B, et al. 2006. Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates. Genetics 173: 2091–2101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DAD-IS, 2007. Domestic Animal Diversity Information System (DAD-IS), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved October 07, 2007, from http://dad.fao.org

  • Dimsoski P, 2003. Development of a 17-plex microsatellite polymerase chain reaction kit for genotyping horses. Croat Med J 44: 332–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eding H, Meuwissen THE, 2001. Marker-based estimates of between and within population kinships for the conservation of genetic diversity. J Anim Breed Genet 118: 141–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engh AL, Funk SM, van Horn RC, Scribner KT, Bruford MW, Libants S, et al. 2002. Reproductive skew among males in a female-dominated society. Behav Ecol 13: 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 1998. Secondary Guidelines for Development of National Farm Animal Genetic Resources Management Plans. Management of Small Populations at Risk. Initiative for Domestic Animal Diversity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaubitz JC, Rhodes Jr OE, Dewoody JA, 2003. Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms. Mol Ecol 12: 1039–1047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodisman MAD, Crozier RH, 2002. Population and colony genetic structure of the primitive termiteMastotermes darwiniensis. Evolution 56: 70–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight KF, Queller DC, 1999. Computer software for performing likelihood test of pedigree relationship using genetic markers. Mol Ecol 8: 1231–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Miller PS, 1992. Conservation genetics: techniques and fundamentals. Ecol Appl 2: 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heg D, van Treuren R, 1998. Female-female cooperation in polygynous oystercatchers. Nature 391: 687–691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR, 1976. A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix use in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huby M, Griffon L, Moureaux S, De Rochambeau H, Danchin-Burge C, Verrier E, 2003. Genetic variability of six French meat sheep breeds in relation to their genetic management. Genet Sel Evol 35: 637–655.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KL, Glenn TC, Lacy RC, Pierce JR, Unruh N, Mirande CM, et al. 2002. Refining the whooping crane studbook by incorporating microsatellite DNA and leg-banding analyses. Conserv Biol 16: 789–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Weeks DE, Chakravarti A, 1993. Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. Hum Hered 43: 45–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Ritland K, 1999. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152: 1753–1766.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maignel L, Boichard D, Verrier E, 1996. Genetic variability of French dairy breeds estimated from pedigree information. Interbull Bull 14: 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malécot G, 1948.Les mathématiques de l’hérédité. Paris: Masson et Cie. Cited by Van Vleck (1987) and Minvielle (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen THE, Luo Z, 1992. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genet Sel Evol 24: 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minvielle F, 1990.Principes d’amélioration génétique des animaux domestiques. Paris: INRA & Québec: PUL (Les presses Universitaires de Laval).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PA, Moore JJ, Chakraborty R, Jin L, Goodall J, Woodruff DS, 1994. Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees. Science 265: 1193–1201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau TA, Ritland K, Heath DD, 1998. A novel method for estimating heritability using molecular markers. Heredity 80: 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson JP, 1997. Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. J Anim Sci 75: 1738–1745.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliehoek PA, Windig JJ, van Arendonk JAM, Bijma P, 2006. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs. Genetics 173: 483–496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P, Crozier RH, 1982. Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations — methodology. Theor Popul Biol 21: 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF, 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43: 258–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritland K, 2000. Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature. Mol Ecol 9: 1195–1204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rochambeau H (de), Fournet-Hanocq F, Vu Tien Khang J, 2000. Measuring and managing genetic variability in small populations. Ann Zootech 49: 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1999. SAS/STAT User’s Guide: Version 8. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas SC, Hill WG, 2002. Sibship reconstruction in hierarchical population structure using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Genet Res 79: 227–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toro M, Barragán C, Óvilo C, Rodrigańez J, Rodriguez C, Silió L, 2002. Estimation of coancestry in Iberian pigsusingmolecularmarkers. Conserv Genet 3: 309–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E, 2001. A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators. Mol Ecol 10: 1539–1549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raden PM, 1992. Accounting for inbreeding and crossbreeding in genetic evaluation of large populations. J Dairy Sci 75: 3136–3144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanRaden PM, 2007. Genomic measures of relationship and inbreeding. Interbull Annual Meeting Proceedings. Interbull Bull 37: 33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vleck LD, Pollak EJ, Oltenacu EAB, 1987. Genetics for the animal sciences. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrier E, Rognon X, de Rochambeau H, Laloe D, 2005. Les outils et méthodes de la génétique pour la caractérisation, le suivi et la gestion de la variabilité génétique des populations animales. Ethnozootechnie 76: 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S, 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat 56: 330. Cited by Van Vleck et al. (1987) and Henderson (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S, McPhee HC, 1925. An approximate method of calculating coefficients of inbreeding and relationship from livestock pedigrees. J Agr Res 31: 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Bömcke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bömcke, E., Gengler, N. Combining microsatellite and pedigree data to estimate relationships among Skyros ponies. J Appl Genet 50, 133–143 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195664

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195664

Keywords

Navigation