Abstract
When the two eyes are presented with incompatible stimuli, the two monocular stimuli are seen alternately in a never-ending cycle. It is now widely accepted that the neural processes underlying this phenomenon, binocular rivalry, are distributed across a number of cortical stages. It is not clear, however, where binocular rivalry is initiated. We performed two experiments whose aim was to clarify this issue. In the first experiment, rivalry was induced, and brief test stimuli were delivered to an eye while its inducing stimulus was either dominant or suppressed. Sensitivity to a test stimulus with features similar to those of the suppressed inducing stimulus was reduced only when the test was presented to the eye whose inducing stimulus was suppressed. This indicates that suppression of a monocular channel is a prerequisite for binocular rivalry suppression. The second experiment showed that to induce rivalry, local interocular stimulus incompatibilities were necessary and that conflicting global percepts were not sufficient. These results suggest that low-level visual processes are required for the initiation of binocular rivalry.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alais, D., & Parker, A. (2006). Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron, 52, 911–920. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.027
Blake, R., & Camisa, J. (1979). On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 315–323. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.315
Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974a). Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature, 249, 488–490. doi:10.1038/249488a0
Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974b). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687–692. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(74)90065-0
Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13–21. doi:10.1038/nrn701
Blake, R., Tadin, D., Sobel, K. V., Raissian, T. A., & Chong, S. C. (2006). Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 4783–4788. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509634103
Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223–231. doi:10.1068/p090223
Blakemore, C. [B.], & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology, 203, 237–260.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
Burkhalter, A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1986). Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and V2 of ventral extrastriate cortex in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 2327–2351.
Cagenello, R., Arditi, A., & Halpern, D. L. (1993). Binocular enhancement of visual acuity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 1841–1848. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.10.001841
Campbell, F. W., Gilinsky, A. S., Howell, E. R., Riggs, L. A., & Atkinson, J. (1973). The dependence of monocular rivalry on orientation. Perception, 2, 123–125. doi:10.1068/p020123
Chen, X., & He, S. (2004). Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Current Biology, 14, 1013–1017. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.042
Diaz-Caneja, E. (1928). Sur l'alternance binoculaire. Annales d'Oculistique, 165, 721–731. [Translated by Alais, D., O'Shea, R. P., Mesana-Alais, C., & Wilson, I. G. (2000). On binocular alternation. Perception, 29, 1437–1445. doi:10.1068/p3017]
Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1380–1385. doi:10.1038/nn1537
Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4412–4420. doi:10.1152/jn.00557.2005
Freeman, A. W., & Li, D. F. (2004, October). Binocular rivalry: Feature suppression requires eye suppression. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego.
Gallant, J. L., Braun, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. Science, 259, 100–103. doi:10.1126/science.8418487
Haynes, J.-D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496–499. doi:10.1038/nature04169
Hess, R. F., Wang, Y.-Z., & Dakin, S. C. (1999). Are judgements of circularity local or global? Vision Research, 39, 4354–4360. doi:10.1016/ S0042-6989(99)00153-4
Kovács, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., & Fehér, Á. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 15508–15511.
Lee, D. K., Itti, L., Koch, C., & Braun, J. (1999). Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 375–381. doi:10.1038/7286
Lee, S.-H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447–1454. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00269-7
Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549–553. doi:10.1038/379549a0
Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621–624. doi:10.1038/380621a0
Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4, 539–551. doi:10.1167/4.7.2
Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Alais, D. (2003). Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research, 43, 2003–2008. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00314-6
Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 348–360.
O'Shea, R. P., & Crassini, B. (1981). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques. Perception, 10, 283–293. doi:10.1068/p100283
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
Reynolds, J. H., Alborzian, S., & Stoner, G. R. (2003). Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces. Vision Research, 43, 59–66. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00403-0
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019–1025. doi:10.1038/14819
Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 3408–3413.
Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195–199. doi:10.1038/35075583
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753–759. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80592-9
Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., & Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 488–505. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.488
Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 90–94.
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113–120.
Watson, T. L., Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2004). Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 14, 1670–1674. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.064
Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2006). Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 17507–17512. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604673103
Wilkinson, F., James, T. W., Wilson, H. R., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings. Current Biology, 10, 1455–1458. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00800-9
Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 14499–14503. doi:10.1073/pnas.2333622100
Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471–478. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(84)90044-0
Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595–1602. doi:10.1038/nn1554
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Note—Accepted by the previous editorial team, when Thomas H. Carr was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freeman, A.W., Li, D.F. Conditions required for binocular rivalry suppression. Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 174–182 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.174
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.174