Abstract
Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured at a central focus of attention and at 20°, 40°, and 60° locations distant in azimuth. Measurements were taken with one target collocated with two maskers, or with maskers flanking the target by ±20°. For 80% of trials, the target was played from the attended location (“expected”), and 20% came from another (“unexpected”) location. For collocated stimuli, SRTs worsened with increasing distance from the expected location by 2.1 dB over the 60° azimuth and by 5.1 dB for spatially separated target and maskers. In spatially separated conditions, a 2.9-dB change was still found when gaze was away from the attended location. Spatial attention appears to increase speech intelligibility against interferers, with gain decreasing with distance from the focus of attention. Spatial release from masking (RFM) was only found for the attended location. Further experiments suggest that target location uncertainty prevented RFM at unattended locations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alais, D., & Carlile, S. (2005). Synchronizing to real events: Subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 2244–2267.
Arbogast, T. L., & Kidd, G., Jr. (2000). Evidence for spatial tuning in informational masking using the probe-signal method. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1803–1810.
Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., & Kidd, G., Jr. (2002). The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2086–2098.
Best, V., Carlile, S., Jin, C., & van Schaik, A. (2005). The role of high frequencies in speech localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 353–363.
Brungart, D. S. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101–1109.
Brungart, D. S., Simpson, B. D., Ericson, M. A., & Scott, K. R. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2527–2538.
Carlile, S., Delaney, S., & Corderoy, A. (1999). The localisation of spectrally restricted sounds by human listeners. Hearing Research, 128, 175–189.
Carlile, S., Leong, P., & Hyams, S. (1997). The nature and distribution of errors in the localization of sounds by humans. Hearing Research, 114, 179–196.
Carlile, S., & Pralong, D. (1994). The location-dependent nature of perceptually salient features of the human head-related transfer functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3445–3459.
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.
Connine, C. M. (2004). It's not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1084–1089.
Darwin, C. J., Brungart, D. S., & Simpson, B. D. (2003). Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 2913–2922.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
Downing, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 188–202.
Edmonds, B. A., & Culling, J. F. (2005). The spatial unmasking of speech: Evidence for within-channel processing of interaural time delay. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 3069–3078.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Ericson, M. A., Brungart, D. S., & Simpson, B. D. (2004). Factors that influence intelligibility in multitalker speech displays. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 313–334.
Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1725–1736.
Freyman, R., Balakrishnan, U., & Helfer, K. (2001). Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2112–2122.
Giard, M.-H., Fort, A., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., & Pernier, J. (2000). Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5, D84-D94.
Hall, J. W., III, Buss, E., & Grose, J. H. (2005). Informational masking release in children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1605–1613.
Hawley, M., Litovsky, R., & Culling, J. (2004). The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 833–843.
Jin, C., Best, V., Carlile, S., Baer, T., & Moore, B. (2002). Speech localization. In Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society, 112th Convention. Munich, Germany.
Kidd, G., Jr., Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., & Gallun, F. J. (2005). The advantage of knowing where to listen. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3804–3815.
Kidd, G., Jr., Mason, C. R., Deliwala, P. S., Woods, W. S., & Colburn, H. S. (1994). Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3475–3480.
Kidd, G., Jr., Mason, C. R., & Gallun, F. J. (2005). Combining energetic and informational masking for speech identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 982–992.
Kidd, G., Jr., Mason, C. R., Rohtla, T. L., & Deliwala, P. S. (1998). Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 422–431.
Langendijk, E. H., & Bronkhorst, A. W. (2002). Contribution of spectral cues to human sound localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1583–1596.
Lie, E., & Branch Coslett, H. (2006). The effect of gaze direction on sound localization in brain-injured and normal adults. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 322–336.
Litovsky, R. Y. (2005). Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 3091–3099.
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, 1–36.
Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1988). Spatial gradients of visual attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 70, 417–428.
Mills, A. W. (1958). On the minimum audible angle. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 237–246.
Mondor, T. A., & Bregman, A. S. (1994). Allocating attention to frequency regions. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 268–276.
Mondor, T. A., & Zatorre, R. J. (1995). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 387–409.
Mondor, T. A., Zatorre, R. J., & Terrio, N. A. (1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 66–79.
Noble, W., & Perrett, S. (2002). Hearing speech against spatially separate competing speech versus competing noise. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1325–1336.
Persson, P., Harder, H., Arlinger, S., & Magnuson, B. (2001). Speech recognition in background noise: Monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients. Otology & Neurotology, 22, 625–630.
Rhebergen, K. S., Versfeld, N. J., & Dreschler, W. A. (2005). Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1274–1277.
Rhodes, G. (1987). Auditory attention and the representation of spatial information. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 1–14.
Rivenez, M., Darwin, C. J., & Guillaume, A. (2006). Processing unattended speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 4027–4040.
Rorden, C., & Driver, J. (1999). Does auditory attention shift in the direction of an upcoming saccade? Neuropsychologia, 37, 357–377.
Sach, A., Hill, N., & Bailey, P. (2000). Auditory spatial attention using interaural time differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 717–729.
Scharf, B. (1991). Frequency selectivity, critical bands, and focused attention. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2356.
Scharlau, I. (2004). The spatial distribution of attention in perceptual latency priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1411–1436.
Shinn-Cunningham, B., & Ihlefeld, A. (2004). Selective and divided attention: Extracting information from simultaneous sound sources. In Proceedings of the 10th ICAD 04 Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display. Sydney, Australia.
Sonnadara, R. R., Alain, C., & Trainor, L. J. (2006). Effects of spatial separation and stimulus probability on the event-related potentials elicited by occasional changes in sound location. Brain Research, 1071, 175–185.
Teder, W., & Näätänen, R. (1994). Event-related potentials demonstrate a narrow focus of auditory spatial attention. NeuroReport, 5, 709–711.
Teder-Sälejärvi, W., & Hillyard, S. (1998). The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free field: An event-related potential study. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1228–1242.
Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Hillyard, S., Roder, B., & Neville, H. (1999). Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 213–227.
Treisman, A. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.
Watson, A. B. (1979). Probability summation over time. Vision Research, 19, 515–522.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council.
Note—Accepted by the previous editorial team, when Thomas H. Carr was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, K., Alais, D. & Carlile, S. Speech intelligibility reduces over distance from an attended location: Evidence for an auditory spatial gradient of attention. Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 164–173 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.164
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.164