Abstract
To compare the timing of perceptual and motor decisions, distinct tasks have been designed, all of which have yielded systematic differences between these two moments. These observations have been taken as evidence of a sensorimotor dissociation. Inasmuch as the distinction between perceptual and motor decision moments is conceptually warranted, this conclusion remains debatable, since the observed differences may reflect the dissimilarity between the stimulations/tasks used to assess them. Here, we minimize such dissimilarities by comparing response time (RT) and anticipatory RT (ART), an alternative technique with which to infer the relative perceptual decision moments. Observers pressed a key either in synchrony with the third of a sequence of three stimuli appearing at a constant pace (ART) or in response to the onset of this third stimulus presented at a random interval after the second (RT). Hence, the two stimulation sequences were virtually identical. Both the mean and the variance of RT were affected by stimulus intensity about 1.5 times more than were the mean and the variance of ART. Within the framework of two simple integration-to-bound models, these findings are compatible with the hypothesis that perceptual and motor decisions operate on the same internal signal but are based on distinct criteria, with the perceptual criterion lower than the motor one.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, L. G. (1998). The influence of the scalar timing model on human timing research. Behavioural Processes, 44, 101–117.
Aschersleben, G. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain & Cognition, 48, 66–79.
Aschersleben, G., & Müsseler, J. (1999). Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1709–1720.
Bamber, D. (1979). State-trace analysis: A method of testing simple theories of causation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 137–181.
Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153–178.
Buonomano, D. V. (2000). Decoding temporal information: A model based on short-term synaptic plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1129–1141.
Cardoso-Leite, P., Gorea, A., & Mamassian, P. (2007). Temporal order judgment and simple reaction times: Evidence for a common processing system. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–14.
Carpenter, R. H. S., & Williams, M. L. L. (1995). Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature, 377, 59–62.
Doehring, D. G. (1961). Accuracy and consistency of time-estimation by four methods of reproduction. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 27–35.
Ejima, Y., & Ohtani, Y. (1987). Simple reaction time to sinusoidal grating and perceptual integration time: Contributions of perceptual and response processes. Vision Research, 27, 269–276.
Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20–25.
Gegenfurtner, K. R., & Franz, V. H. (2007). A comparison of localization judgments and pointing precision. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–12.
Gibbon, J., & Rutschmann, R. (1969). Temporal order judgment and reaction time. Science, 165, 413–415.
Glimcher, P. W. (2003). Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain: The science of neuroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 10–16.
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20–25.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Grice, G. R. (1972). Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the type of catch trial. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 103–107.
Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Cousineau, D. (2004). QMPE: Estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 277–290.
Helmholtz, H. von (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: Voss.
Hunt, A. R., von Mühlenen, A., & Kingstone, A. (2007). The time course of attentional and oculomotor capture reveals a common cause. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 271–284.
Janssen, P., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005). A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 234–241.
Jaśkowski, P. (1992). Temporal-order judgment and reaction time for short and long stimuli. Psychological Research, 54, 141–145.
Jaśkowski, P. (1993). Temporal-order judgment and reaction time to stimuli of different rise times. Perception, 22, 963–970.
Jaśkowski, P. (1996). Simple reaction time and perception of temporal order: Dissociations and hypotheses. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 82, 707–730.
Jaśkowski, P. (1999). Reaction time and temporal order judgment as measures of perceptual latency: The problem of dissociations. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 265–282). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Jaśkowski, P., & Verleger, R. (2000). Attentional bias toward lowintensity stimuli: An explanation for the intensity dissociation between reaction time and temporal order judgment? Consciousness & Cognition, 9, 435–456.
Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kanai, R., & Kamitani, Y. (2003). Time-locked perceptual fading induced by visual transients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 664–672.
Karmarkar, U. R., & Buonomano, D. V. (2007). Timing in the absence of clocks: Encoding time in neural network states. Neuron, 53, 427–438.
Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 976–992.
Krystek, M., & Anton, M. (2007). A weighted total least-squares algorithm for fitting a straight line. Measurement Science & Technology, 18, 3438–3442.
Krystek, M., & Anton, M. (2008). A weighted total least-squares algorithm for fitting a straight line. Measurement Science & Technology, 19, 079801.
Lennie, P. (1981). The physiological basis of variations in visual latency. Vision Research, 21, 815–824.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maloney, L. T. (2002). Statistical decision theory and biological vision. In D. Heyer & R. Mausfeld (Eds.), Perception and the physical world: Psychological and philosophical issues in perception (pp. 145–189). New York: Wiley.
Mamassian, P. (2006). Visuo-motor synchrony [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6, 395.
Mamassian, P. (2008). Overconfidence in an objective anticipatory motor task. Psychological Science, 19, 601–606.
Mauk, M. D., & Buonomano, D. V. (2004). The neural basis of temporal processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 307–340.
Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369–402.
Miller, J., & Schwarz, W. (2006). Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: A diffusion model approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 394–412.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miyazaki, M., Yamamoto, S., Uchida, S., & Kitazawa, S. (2006). Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 875–877.
Neumann, O., Esselmann, U., & Klotz, W. (1993). Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal-order judgment. Psychological Research, 56, 26–34.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Pisella, L., Binkofski, F., Lasek, K., Toni, I., & Rossetti, Y. (2006). No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2734–2748.
Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20.
Reddi, B. A. J., Asrress, K. N., & Carpenter, R. H. S. (2003). Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3538–3546.
Reeves, A., Santhi, N., & DeCaro, S. (2005). A random-ray model for speed and accuracy in perceptual experiments. Spatial Vision, 18, 73–83.
Rossetti, Y., Pisella, L., & Vighetto, A. (2003). Optic ataxia revisited: Visually guided action versus immediate visuomotor control. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 171–179.
Roufs, J. A. J. (1963). Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminance. Vision Research, 3, 81–91.
Roufs, J. A. J. (1974). Dynamic properties of vision: V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds. Vision Research, 14, 853–869.
Sanford, A. J. (1974). Attention bias and the relation of perception lag to simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 443–446.
Schenk, T. (2006). An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D.F. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1369–1370.
Schmidt, T., & Vorberg, D. (2006). Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 489–504.
Sternberg, S., & Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 629–685). New York: Academic Press.
Stevens, L. T. (1886). On the time sense. Mind, 11, 393–404.
Stone, L. S., & Krauzlis, R. J. (2003). Shared motion signals for human perceptual decisions and oculomotor actions. Journal of Vision, 3, 725–736.
Tappe, T., Niepel, M., & Neumann, O. (1994). A dissociation between reaction time to sinusoidal gratings and temporal-order judgment. Perception, 23, 335–347.
Trommershäuser, J., Landy, M. S., & Maloney, L. T. (2006). Humans rapidly estimate expected gain in movement planning. Psychological Science, 17, 981–988.
Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarz-bach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 6275–6280.
Wald, A. (1947). Sequential analysis. New York: Wiley.
Waszak, F., Cardoso-Leite, P., & Gorea, A. (2007). Perceptual criterion and motor threshold: A signal detection analysis of the relationship between perception and action. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 179–188.
Waszak, F., & Gorea, A. (2004). A new look at the relationship between perceptual and motor responses. Visual Cognition, 11, 947–963.
Wearden, J. H. (2003). Applying the scalar timing model to human time psychology: Progress and challenges. In H. Helfrich (Ed.), Time and mind II: Information processing perspectives (pp. 21–39). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by Grants ANR-06-NEURO-042-01 and BQR Paris Descartes Univ. 2006 to A.G. We thank Simon Barthelmé, Joshua Solomon, our action editor, and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful contributions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardoso-Leite, P., Mamassian, P. & Gorea, A. Comparison of perceptual and motor latencies via anticipatory and reactive response times. Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 82–94 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.82
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.82