Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revisiting the Relation Between Species Diversity and Information Theory

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Shannon information function (H) has been extensively used in ecology as a statistic of species diversity. Yet, the use of Shannon diversity index has also been criticized, mainly because of its ambiguous ecological interpretation and because of its relatively great sensitivity to the relative abundances of species in the community. In my opinion, the major shortcoming of the traditional perspective (on the possible relation of species diversity with information theory) is that species need for an external receiver (the scientist or ecologist) to exist and transmit information. Because organisms are self-catalized replicating structures that can transmit genotypic information to offspring, it should be evident that any single species has two possible states or alternatives: to be or not to be. In other words, species have no need for an external receiver since they are their own receivers. Therefore, the amount of biological information (at the species scale) in a community with one only species would be \( { \log }_{2} 2^{1} = 1 \) species, and not \( { \log }_{2} 1 = 0 \) bits as in the traditional perspective. Moreover, species diversity appears to be a monotonic increasing function of \( { \log }_{2} 2^{{\text{S}}} \) (or S) when all species are equally probable (S being species richness), and not a function of \( { \log }_{2} {\text{ S}} \) as in the traditional perspective. To avoid the noted shortcoming, we could use 2H (instead of H) for calculating species diversity and species evenness (= 2H/S). However, owing to the relatively great sensitivity of H to the relative abundances of species in the community, the value of species dominance (= 1 − 2H/S) is unreasonably high when differences between dominant and subordinate species are considerable, thereby lowering the value of species evenness and diversity. This unsatisfactory behaviour is even more evident for Simpson index and related algorithms. I propose the use of other statistics for a better analysis of community structure, their relationship being: species evenness + species dominance = 1; species diversity × species uniformity = 1; and species diversity = species richness × species evenness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brooks DR, Wiley EO (1988) Evolution as entropy: towards a unified theory of biology, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JA (1992a) Can dominance influence stability in competitive interactions? Oikos 64:605–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JA (1992b) New diversity index for assessing structural alterations in aquatic communities. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 48:428–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JA (1993a) Must dominance increase with the number of subordinate species in competitive interactions? J Theor Biol 161:537–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JA (1993b) Dynamic stability in hydropsychid guilds along a regulated stream: the role of competitive interactions versus environmental perturbations. Regul Rivers 8:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JA (1995) On measuring species evenness and other associated parameters of community structure? Oikos 74:538–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatlin LL (1972) Information theory and the living system. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini C (1921) Measurement of inequality and incomes. Econ J 31:124–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good IJ (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40:237–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Good IJ (1982) Diversity as a concept and its measurement: comment. J Am Stat Assoc 77:561–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D (1975) The theory of diversity–stability relationship in ecology. Q Rev Biol 50:237–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley RVL (1928) Transmission of information. Bell Syst Tech J 7:535–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Izakov MN (1997) Selforganisation and information for planets and ecosystems. Usp Fizich Nauk 167:1087–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L (1981) The thermodynamic origin of ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:571–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2007) Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–2439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton RA (1979) Structure of species abundance and measurement of diversity. Biometrics 35:307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton RA, Wedderburn RW (1978) A comparison of three measures of species diversity. Biometrics 34:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1955) Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36:533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1965) Patterns of species diversity. Biol Rev 40:510–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef R (1957) La teoría de la información en ecología. Mem Real Acad Cien Artes Barcelona 32:373–449

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1975) Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 81–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist H (1924) Certain factors affecting telegraph speed. Bell Syst Tech J 3:324–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil GP, Taillie C (1982) Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J Am Stat Assoc 77:548–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne LX, Schindler DE, Parrish JK, Temple SA (2005) Quantifying spatial pattern with evenness indices. Ecol Appl 15:507–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peet RK (1974) The measurement of species diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C (2005) On hierarchical diversity decomposition. J Veg Sci 16:223–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C (2007) A semantic taxonomy for diversity measures. Acta Biotheor 55:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423, 623–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Wilson JB (1996) A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE, Henderson PA (2000) Ecological methods, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (2001) Information theory in ecology. Comput Chem 25:393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington HG (1984) Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: a review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Water Res 18:653–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicken JS (1983) Entropy, information, and nonequilibrium evolution. Syst Zool 32:438–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CB (1964) Patterns in the balance of nature. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was almost completed at St. Cloud State University (Minnesota, USA) while I spent a sabbatical period, being supported by a grant (“programa movilidad”) from the current Spanish Ministry for Education and Science. I also want to thank Dr. Neal J. Voelz for his comments and suggestions during the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio A. Camargo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camargo, J.A. Revisiting the Relation Between Species Diversity and Information Theory. Acta Biotheor 56, 275–283 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-008-9053-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-008-9053-x

Keywords

Navigation