Skip to main content
Log in

Contact-Coupled Impact of Slender Rods: Analysis and Experimental Validation

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To validate models of contact mechanics in low speed structural impact, slender rods were impacted in a drop tower, and measurements of the contact and vibration were compared to analytical and finite element (FE) models. The contact area was recorded using a novel thin-film transfer technique, and the contact duration was measured using electrical continuity. Strain gages recorded the vibratory strain in one rod, and a laser Doppler vibrometer measured speed. The experiment was modeled analytically on a one-dimensional spatial domain using a quasi-static Hertzian contact law and a system of delay differential equations. The three-dimensional FE model used hexahedral elements, a penalty contact algorithm, and explicit time integration. A small submodel taken from the initial global FE model economically refined the analysis in the small contact region. Measured contact areas were within 6 % of both models’ predictions, peak speeds within 2 %, cyclic strains within 12 με (RMS value), and contact durations within 2 μs. The global FE model and the measurements revealed small disturbances, not predicted by the analytical model, believed to be caused by interactions of the non-planar stress wavefront with the rod’s ends. The accuracy of the predictions for this simple test, as well as the versatility of the diagnostic tools, validates the theoretical and computational models, corroborates instrument calibration, and establishes confidence that the same methods may be used in experimental and computational study of contact mechanics during impact of more complicated structures. Recommendations are made for applying the methods to a particular biomechanical problem: the edge-loading of a loose prosthetic hip joint which can lead to premature wear and prosthesis failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomson WT (1960) Laplace transformation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldsmith W (1960) Impact: The theory and physical behaviour of colliding solids. Edward Arnold, Ltd., London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo A, Batzer S (2004) Substructure analysis of a flexible system contact-impact event. J Vib Acoust 126(1):126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marghitu DB, Boghiu D (1996) Spatial impact of a flexible link using a nonlinear contact force. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Atlanta, 1996. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division (Publication) DE. ASME, New York, NY, USA, pp 103–110

  6. Schiehlen W, Seifried R (2004) Three approaches for elastodynamic contact in multibody systems. Multibody Sys Dyn 12(1):1–16

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Trowbridge DA, Grady JE, Aiello RA (1991) Low velocity impact analysis with NASTRAN. Comput Struct 40(4):977–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Seifried R, Hu B (2003) Numerical and experimental investigation of radial impacts on a half-circular plate. Multibody Sys Dyn 9(3):265–281

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wei H, Yida Z (1995) Finite element analysis on collision between two moving elastic bodies at low velocities. Comput Struct 57(3):379–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2002) Pulse shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Exp Mech 42(1):93–106. doi:10.1177/0018512002042001794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Doyle JF (1997) Wavelet deconvolution method for impact force identification. Exp Mech 37(4):403–408

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang IY, Im KH (1996) Impulsive stress analysis of plates at the concentrated impact loading point by the three-dimensional dynamic theory of elasticity. Exp Mech 36(4):421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Doyle JF (1987) Determining the contact force during the transverse impact of plates. Exp Mech 27(1):68–72

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu B, Eberhard P (2004) Simulation of longitudinal impact waves using time delayed systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 126(3):644–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cormier NG, Smallwood BS, Sinclair GB et al (1999) Aggressive submodelling of stress concentrations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46:889–909

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajasekaran R, Nowell D (2005) On the finite element analysis of contacting bodies using submodelling. J Strain Anal Eng Des 40:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nevelos J, Ingham E, Doyle C et al (2000) Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patterns. J Arthroplasty 15(6):793–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walter WL, Insley GM, Walter WK et al (2004) Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings: stripe wear. J Arthroplasty 19(4):402–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwon YM, Glyn-Jones S, Simpson DJ et al (2010) Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):356–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanders AP, Brannon RM (2011) Assessment of the applicability of the Hertzian contact theory to edge-loaded prosthetic hip bearings. J Biomech 44(16):2802–2808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreyszig E (1988) Advanced engineering mathematics, 6th edn. Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Drumheller DS (1998) Introduction to wave propagation in nonlinear fluids and solids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu B, Schiehlen W, Eberhard P (2003) Comparison of analytical and experimental results for longitudinal impacts on elastic rods. J Vib Control 9(1–2):157–174

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Shampine LF, Reichelt MW (1997) The MATLAB ODE suite. SIAM J Sci Comput 18(1):1

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Fischer-Cripps AC (2000) Introduction to contact mechanics. Mechanical engineering series. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tech Note TN-514: Shunt calibration of strain gage instrumentation (2007) Vishay Micro-Measurements, Rayleigh, North Carolina

  28. Sanders AP, Brannon RM (2011) Determining a surrogate contact pair in a Hertzian contact problem. J Tribol 133(2):024502–024506. doi:10.1115/1.4003492

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health/NIAMS, Grant No. 1R21AR056374. The authors thank Jeff Kessler for laboratory assistance, particularly with the drop tower test machine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A.P. Sanders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanders, A., Tibbitts, I., Kakarla, D. et al. Contact-Coupled Impact of Slender Rods: Analysis and Experimental Validation. Exp Mech 54, 187–198 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-013-9778-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-013-9778-6

Keywords

Navigation