Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A microfluidic passive pumping Coulter counter

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A microfluidic device using on-chip passive pumping was characterized for use as a particle counter. Flow occurred due to a Young-Laplace pressure gradient between two 1.2-mm diameter inlets and a 4-mm diameter reservoir when 0.5-μl fluid droplets were applied to the inlets using a micropipette. Polystyrene particles (10-μm diameter) were enumerated using the resistive pulse technique. Particle counts using passive pumping were within 13% of counts from a device using syringe pumping. All pumping methods produced particle counts that were within 16% of those obtained with a hemocytometer. The effect of intermediate wash steps on particle counts within the passive pumping device was determined. Zero, one, or two wash droplets were loaded after the first of two sample droplets. No statistical difference was detected in the mean particle counts among the loading patterns (p > 0.05). Hydrodynamic focusing using passive pumping was also demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt S, Seebach J, Psathaki K, Galla H, Wegener J (2004) Bioelectrical impedance assay to monitor changes in cell shape during apoptosis. Biosens Bioelectron 19(6):583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ateya D, Sachs F, Gottlieb P, Besch S, Hua S (2005) Volume cytometry: microfluidic sensor for high-throughput screening in real time. Anal Chem 77(5):1290–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benazzi G, Holmes D, Sun T, Mowlem MC, Morgan H (2007) Discrimination and analysis of phytoplankton using a microfluidic cytometer. IET Nanobiotechnol 1(6):94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthier E, Beebe DJ (2007) Flow rate analysis of a surface tension driven passive micropump. Lab Chip 7(11):1475–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthier E, Warrick J, Yu H, Beebe D (2008) Managing evaporation for more robust microscale assays part 2. characterization of convection and diffusion for cell biology. Lab Chip 8(6):860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonaro A, Sohn L (2005) A resistive-pulse sensor chip for multianalyte immunoassays. Lab Chip 5(10):1155–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Hsiung S, Lee G (2007) Micro flow cytometer chip integrated with micro-pumps/micro-valves for multi-wavelength cell counting and sorting. Jpn J Appl Phys 46(5A):3126–3134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen I, Eckstein E, Lindner E (2009) Computation of transient flow rates in passive pumping micro-fluidic systems. Lab Chip 9(1):107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun H, Chung T, Kim H (2005) Cytometry and velocimetry on a microfluidic chip using polyelectrolytic salt bridges. Anal Chem 77(8):2490–2495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter W (1953) Means for counting particles suspended in a fluid. US Patent 2,656,508

  • DeBlois R, Bean C (1970) Counting and sizing of submicron particles by the resistive pulse technique. Rev Sci Instrum 41:909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Shim J, Vidula M, Hancock M, Lo E, Chung B, Borenstein J, Khabiry M, Cropek D, Khademhosseini A (2009) Rapid generation of spatially and temporally controllable long-range concentration gradients in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip 9(6):761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawad S, Schild L, Renaud P (2001) Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing. Lab Chip 1(1):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gencoglu A, Minerick A (2009) Chemical and morphological changes on platinum microelectrode surfaces in AC and DC fields with biological buffer solutions. Lab Chip 9(13):1866–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairer G, Vellekoop M (2007) Experiments on hydrodynamic focusing of non coaxial sheath flows. In: 5th IEEE Conference on Sensors 2006, pp 431–434

  • Jagtiani AV, Sawant R, Zhe J (2006) A label-free high throughput resistive-pulse sensor for simultaneous differentiation and measurement of multiple particle-laden analytes. J Micromech Microeng 16(8):1530–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju J, Park J, Kim K, Kim H, Berthier E, Beebe D, Lee S (2008) Backward flow in a surface tension driven micropump. J Micromech Microeng 18(8):087,002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch M, Evans A, Brunnschweiler A (1999) Design and fabrication of a micromachined Coulter counter. J Micromech Microeng 9(2):159–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen U, Blankenstein G, Branebjerg J (1997) Microchip Coulter particle counter. In: 1997 TRANSDUCERS ’97 Chicago, 1997 International Conference on Solid state sensors and actuators, vol 2, pp 1319–1322

  • Mao X, Lin S, Dong C, Huang T (2009) Single-layer planar on-chip flow cytometer using microfluidic drifting based three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic focusing. Lab on a Chip 9(11):1583–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyvantsson I, Warrick J, Hayes S, Skoien A, Beebe D (2008) Automated cell culture in high density tubeless microfluidic device arrays. Lab on a Chip 8(5):717–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty S, Beebe D, Mensing G (2006) Chips & tips: PDMS connectors for macro to microfluidic interfacing. Lab Chip http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Journals/lc/PDMS_connector.asp.1 October 2009

  • Nieuwenhuis J, Kohl F, Bastemeijer J, Sarro P, Vellekoop M (2004) Integrated Coulter counter based on 2-dimensional liquid aperture control. Sensor Actuator B 102(1):44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Trujillo R, Mills CA, Samitier J, Gomila G (2007) Low cost micro-coulter counter with hydrodynamic focusing. Microfluid Nanofluid 3(2):171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Trujillo R, Castillo-Fernandez O, Garrido M, Arundell M, Valencia A, Gomila G (2008) High-speed particle detection in a micro-Coulter counter with two-dimensional adjustable aperture. Biosens Bioelectron 24(2):290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh O, Sohn L (2002) Correcting off-axis effects in an on-chip resistive-pulse analyzer. Rev Sci Instrum 73(12):4396–4398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh O, Sohn L (2003a) An artificial nanopore for molecular sensing. Nano Lett 3:37–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh O, Sohn L (2003b) Direct detection of antibody-antigen binding using an on-chip artificial pore. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(3):820–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott R, Sethu P, Harnett CK (2008) Three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing in a microfluidic Coulter counter. Rev Sci Instrum 79(4):046,104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonnet C, Groisman A (2006) High-throughput and high-resolution flow cytometry in molded microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 78:5653–5663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn L, Saleh O, Facer G, Beavis A, Allan R, Notterman D (2000) Capacitance cytometry: measuring biological cells one by one. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10687–10690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tüdős A, Besselink G, Schasfoort R (2001) Trends in miniaturized total analysis systems for point-of-care testing in clinical chemistry. Lab Chip 1(2):83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker G, Beebe D (2002) A passive pumping method for microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 2(3):131–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Kang Y, Xu D, Chon C, Barnett L, Kalams S, Li D, Li D (2008) On-chip counting the number and the percentage of CD4+ T lymphocytes. Lab Chip 8(2):309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrick J, Meyvantsson I, Ju J, Beebe DJ (2007) High-throughput microfluidics: improved sample treatment and washing over standard wells. Lab Chip 7(3):316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins N, Venkatesan B, Toner M, Rodriguez W, Bashir R (2009) A robust electrical microcytometer with 3-dimensional hydrofocusing. Lab Chip 9(22):3177–3184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Chon C, Wang Y, Kang Y, Li D (2008a) Simultaneous particle counting and detecting on a chip. Lab Chip 8(11):1943–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Kang Y, Wang YN, Xu D, Li D, Li D (2008b) Microfluidic differential resistive pulse sensors. Electrophoresis 29(13):2754–2759

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang A, Hsieh W (2007) Hydrodynamic focusing investigation in a micro-flow cytometer. Biomed Microdevices 123:672–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhe J, Jagtiani A, Dutta P, Hu J, Carletta J (2007) A micromachined high throughput Coulter counter for bioparticle detection and counting. J Micromech Microeng 17(2):304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Liu M, Tai YC (2008) Micro Coulter counters with platinum black electroplated electrodes for human blood cell sensing. Biomed Microdevices 10(2):221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Warrick J, Haubert K, Beebe D, Yin J (2009) Infection on a chip: a microscale platform for simple and sensitive cell-based virus assays. Biomed Microdevices 11(3):565–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by UNC C-CCNE grant number NCI 5U54CA119343-04.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh & University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC, USA

    Amy L. McPherson & Glenn M. Walker

Authors
  1. Amy L. McPherson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Glenn M. Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy L. McPherson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McPherson, A.L., Walker, G.M. A microfluidic passive pumping Coulter counter. Microfluid Nanofluid 9, 897–904 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-010-0609-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-010-0609-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation