Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:09:22.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specific Referential Contexts Shape Efficiency in Second Language Processing: Three Eye-Tracking Experiments With 6- and 10-Year-Old Children in Spanish Immersion Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

Casey Lew-Williams
Casey Lew-Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, caseylw@princeton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Efficiency in real-time language processing generally poses a greater challenge to adults learning a second language (L2) than to children learning a first language (L1). A notoriously difficult aspect of language for L2 learners to master is grammatical gender, and previous research has shown that L2 learners do not exploit cues to grammatical gender in ways that resemble L1 speakers. But it is not clear whether this problem is restricted to grammatical gender or whether it reflects a broader difficulty with processing local relations between words. Moreover, we do not know if immersive L2 environments, relative to typical L2 classrooms, confer advantages in learning regularities between words. In three eye-tracking experiments, 6- and 10-year-old children who were enrolled in Spanish immersion elementary schools listened to sentences with articles that conveyed information about the grammatical gender (Experiment 1), biological gender (Experiment 2), and number of referents in the visual field (Experiment 3). L1 children used articles to guide their attention to target referents in all three experiments. L2 children did not take advantage of articles as cues to grammatical gender, but succeeded in doing so for biological gender and number. Interpretations of these findings focus on how learning experiences interact with the nature of specific referential contexts to shape learners’ efficiency in language processing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 37 , September 2017 , pp. 128 - 147
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, 13–26.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic, and perceptual strategies. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: No. 379. Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 190–214). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Brownell, R. (2000). Receptive one-word picture vocabulary test: Spanish-bilingual edition. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2003). Critical periods, sensitive periods, and lateralization. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 9 (2), 39–48.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, A., & Vulchanova, M. D. (2014). Naturalistic acquisition in an early language classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 329.Google Scholar
Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.Google Scholar
Feinauer, E., Hall-Kenyon, K. M., & Davison, K. C. (2013). Cross-language transfer of early literacy skills: An examination of young learners in a two-way bilingual immersion elementary school. Reading Psychology, 34, 436–460.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In Sekerina, I. A., Fernández, E. M., & Clahsen, H. (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children's language processing (pp. 97–135). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fortune, T. W., & Tedick, D. J. (2015). Oral proficiency assessment of English-proficient K–8 Spanish immersion students. Modern Language Journal, 99, 637–655.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2011). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 379–399.Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28, 191–215.Google Scholar
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29, 503–511.Google Scholar
Haith, M. M., Wentworth, N., & Canfield, R. L. (1993). The formation of expectations in early infancy. Advances in Infancy Research, 8, 251–297.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The “failed functional features hypothesis.” Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Owen, M. T., Golinkoff, R. M., Pace, A., . . . Suma, K. (2015). The contribution of early communication to low-income children's language success. Psychological Science, 26, 1071–1083.Google Scholar
Imai, M., Schalk, L., Saalbach, H., & Okada, H. (2014). All giraffes have female-specific properties: Influence of grammatical gender on deductive reasoning about sex-specific properties in German speakers. Cognitive Science, 38, 514–536.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., Gross, M., & Buac, M. (2014). Effects of classroom bilingualism on task-shifting, verbal memory, and word learning in children. Developmental Science, 17, 564–583.Google Scholar
Kovelman, I., Baker, S., & Petitto, L. (2008). Age of first bilingual language exposure as a new window into bilingual reading development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 203– 223.Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18, 193–198.Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2010). Real-time processing of gender- marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 447–464.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In Traxler, M. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 581–611). London, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2005). Extending the competition model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 69–84.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) [Public school data file]. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education website: https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sassGoogle Scholar
Padilla, A. M., Fan, L., Xu, X., & Silva, D. (2013). A Mandarin/English two-way immersion program: Language proficiency and academic achievement. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 661–679.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1982). A theory of the acquisition of lexical interpretive grammars. In Bresnan, J. (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 655–726). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Potowski, K. (2007). Language and identity in a dual immersion school. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuhn, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2002). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: A preference for female. Perception, 31, 1109–1121.Google Scholar
Robertson, E. K., Shi, R., & Melançon, A. (2012). Toddlers use the number feature in determiners during online noun comprehension. Child Development, 83, 2007–2018.Google Scholar
Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., Stowe, L. A., & de Haan, G. J. (2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22, 1–29.Google Scholar
Scherag, A., Demuth, L., Rösler, F., Neville, H. J., & Röder, B. (2004). The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects. Cognition, 93, B97–B108.Google Scholar
Smolík, F. (2014). The use of gender information in lexical processing in Czech 23-month-olds: An eye-tracking study. In Orman, W. & Valleau, M. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 451–462). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2005). Who's “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 29–57.Google Scholar
Tedick, D. J., & Wesley, P. M. (2015). A review of research on content-based foreign/second language education in US K–12 contexts. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28, 25–40.Google Scholar
Tedick, D. J., & Young, A. I. (2014). Fifth grade two-way immersion students’ responses to form- focused instruction. Applied Linguistics, 37, 784–807.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.Google Scholar
van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E. K. (2011). Gender-marked determiners help Dutch learners’ word recognition when gender information itself does not. Journal of Child Language, 38, 87–100.Google Scholar
van Heugten, M., & Shi, R. (2009). French-learning toddlers use gender information on determiners during word recognition. Developmental Science, 12, 419–425.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K. (2005). Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implication for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 501–520.Google Scholar
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 20, 1–10.Google Scholar
Westerveld, M. F. (2014). Emergent literacy performance across two languages: Assessing four-year-old bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17, 526–543.Google Scholar
Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1–B11.Google Scholar