Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty Analysis for Computationally Expensive Models with Multiple Outputs

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bayesian MCMC calibration and uncertainty analysis for computationally expensive models is implemented using the SOARS (Statistical and Optimization Analysis using Response Surfaces) methodology. SOARS uses a radial basis function interpolator as a surrogate, also known as an emulator or meta-model, for the logarithm of the posterior density. To prevent wasteful evaluations of the expensive model, the emulator is built only on a high posterior density region (HPDR), which is located by a global optimization algorithm. The set of points in the HPDR where the expensive model is evaluated is determined sequentially by the GRIMA algorithm described in detail in another paper but outlined here. Enhancements of the GRIMA algorithm were introduced to improve efficiency. A case study uses an eight-parameter SWAT2005 (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model where daily stream flows and phosphorus concentrations are modeled for the Town Brook watershed which is part of the New York City water supply. A Supplemental Material file available online contains additional technical details and additional analysis of the Town Brook application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. R., and Williams, J. R. (1998), “Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment. Part I: Model Development,” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D. M., and Watts, D. G. (1988), Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications, New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bayarri, M. J., Berger, J. O., Paulo, R., Sacks, J., Cafeo, J. A., Cavendish, C.-H., and Tu, J. (2007a), “A Framework for Validation of Computer Models,” Technometrics, 49, 138–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bayarri, M. J., Berger, J. O., Cafeo, J., Garcia-Donato, G., Liu, F., Palomo, J., Parthasarathy, R. J., Paulo, R., Sacks, J., and Walsh, D. (2007b), “Computer Model Validation with Functional Output,” The Annals of Statistics, 35, 1874–1906.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bliznyuk, N., Ruppert, D., and Shoemaker, C. A. (2011), “Bayesian Inference Using Efficient Interpolation of Computationally Expensive Densities With Variable Parameter Costs,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 20, 636–655.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2012), “Local Derivative-Free Approximation of Computationally Expensive Posterior Densities,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. doi:10.1080/10618600.2012.681255.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bliznyuk, N., Ruppert, D., Shoemaker, C. A., Regis, R., Wild, S., and Mugunthan, P. (2008), “Bayesian Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Computationally Expensive Models Using Optimization and Radial Basis Function Approximation,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17, 270–294.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964), “An Analysis of Transformations,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 211–246.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buhmann, M. D. (2003), Radial Basis Functions, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. J., and Ruppert, D. (1984), “Power Transformation When Fitting Theoretical Models to Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 321–328.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1988), Transformation and Weighting in Regression, New York: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, J. A., and Goldstein, M. (2009), “Small Sample Bayesian Designs for Complex High-Dimensional Models Based on Information Gained Using Fast Approximations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 51, 377–388.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, K., Haverkamp, S., Fohrer, N., and Frede, H. G. (2002), “SWAT-G, A Version of SWAT99.2 Modified for Application to Low Mountain Range Catchments,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27, 641–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F., Granlund, K., Rekolainen, S., and Bidoglio, G. (2003), “Modelling Diffuse Emission and Retention of Nutrients in the Vantaanjoki Watershed (Finland) Using the SWAT Model,” Ecological Modelling, 169, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (1994), Time Series Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Higdon, D., Kennedy, M., Cavendish, J. C., Cafeo, J. A., and Ryne, R. D. (2004), “Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction,” SIAM Journal of Scientific Computation, 26, 448–466.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. C., and O’Hagan, A. (2001), “Bayesian Calibration of Computer Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 63, 425–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S., and Steinberg, D. M. (2010), “Computer Experiments: A Review,” AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 94, 311–324.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, P. Z. G. (2009), “Nested Latin Hypercube Design,” Biometrika, 96, 957–970.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, P. Z. G., and Wu, C. F. J. (2008), “Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Integrating Low-Accuracy and High-Accuracy Experiments,” Technometrics, 50, 192–204.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C. E. (2003), ````Gaussian Processes to Speed up Hybrid Monte Carlo for Expensive Bayesian Integrals,” in Bayesian Statistics 7, eds. J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Berger, and A. F. M. Smith, pp. 651–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regis, R. G., and Shoemaker, C. A. (2009), “Parallel Stochastic Global Optimization Using Radial Basis Functions,” INFORMS Journal on Computing, 21, 411–426.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert, D., Wand, M. P., and Carroll, R. J. (2003), Semiparametric Regression, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., and Notz, W. I. (2010), The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, C. A., Regis, R., and Fleming, R. (2007), “Watershed Calibration Using Multistart Local Optimization and Evolutionary Optimization With Radial Basis Function Approximation,” Journal of Hydrologic Science, 52, 450–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2011), “Global Optimization of Computationally Expensive Hydrologic Simulation Models,” Ph.D. Thesis in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University.

  • Tierney, L. (1994), “Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions,” The Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1786.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L., and Kadane, J. (1986), “Accurate Approximations for Posterior Moments and Marginal Densities,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 82–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tjelmeland, H., and Hegstad, B. K. (2001), “Model Jumping Proposals in MCMC,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 28, 205–223.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tolson, B. (2005), “Automatic Calibration, Management and Uncertainty Analysis: Phosphorus Transport in the Cannonsville Watershed, ” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University.

  • Tolson, B., and Shoemaker, C. A. (2004), “Watershed Modeling of the Cannonsville Basin Using SWAT2000: Model Development, Calibration and Validation for the Prediction of Flow, Sediment and Phosphorus Transport to the Cannonsville Reservoir, Version 1,” Technical Report, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University. Available at http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/2710.

  • — (2007a), “The Dynamically Dimensioned Search Algorithm for Computationally Efficient Automatic Calibration of Environmental Simulation Models,” Water Resources Research, 43, W01413. doi:10.1029/2005WR004723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007b), “Cannonsville Reservoir Watershed SWAT2000 Model Development, Calibration and Validation,” Journal of Hydrology, 337, 68–89 doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Berghen, F., and Bersini, H. (2005), “CONDOR, a New Parallel, Constrained Extension of Powell’s UOBYQA Algorithm: Experimental Results and Comparison With the DFO Algorithm,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 181, 157–175.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, S. M., and Shoemaker, C. A. (2011), “Global Convergence of Radial Basis Functions Trust Region Derivative-Free Algorithms,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, 20, 387–415.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, S. M., Regis, R. G., and Shoemaker, C. A. (2007), “ORBIT: Optimization by Radial Basis Function Interpolation in Trust-Regions,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 30, 3197–3219.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ruppert.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 2.8 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruppert, D., Shoemaker, C.A., Wang, Y. et al. Uncertainty Analysis for Computationally Expensive Models with Multiple Outputs. JABES 17, 623–640 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-012-0091-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-012-0091-0

Key Words

Navigation