Application of CRISPR/Cas9 to the study of brain development and neuropsychiatric disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2017.05.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • CRISPR/Cas9 techniques to study neurodevelopment.

  • CRISPR/Cas9 applications to hiPSC-based models of neuropsychiatric disease.

  • The potential for CRISPR/Cas9 approaches to advance our understanding of psychiatric illnesses.

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 technology has transformed our ability to manipulate the genome and epigenome, from efficient genomic editing to targeted localization of effectors to specific loci. Through the manipulation of DNA- and histone-modifying enzyme activities, activation or repression of gene expression, and targeting of transcriptional regulators, the role of gene-regulatory and epigenetic pathways in basic biology and disease processes can be directly queried. Here, we discuss emerging CRISPR-based methodologies, with specific consideration of neurobiological applications of human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based models.

Section snippets

Epigenetics in neuropsychiatric disease

Increasing evidence supports a strong role for transcriptional and epigenetic abnormalities in the development of neurological (Jakovcevski and Akbarian, 2012) and psychiatric (Peña et al., 2014) diseases. Epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA and histone post-translational modifications, non-coding RNA-mediated processes, and higher order chromatin structure dynamics regulate a wide variety of neuronal processes and modulate susceptibility to neuropsychiatric illnesses (McGill and Zoghbi, 2014,

Introduction to CRISPR/Cas9

The clustered, regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas (CRISPR-associated protein) system allows targeted and specific genetic manipulation. It was initially discovered as a key defense mechanism against invading viruses and plasmids in several bacterial species and Archaea (well reviewed in Wang et al., 2016). When microorganisms incorporate invading DNA sequences into their genomes, these sequences are transcribed into CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) (Ishino et al., 1987) that, when

Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 to study transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms underlying disease processes

CRISPR/Cas9 can be used to modulate expression of histone- and DNA-modifying enzymes, alter DNA-binding sites of factors that regulate transcription, perturb non-coding RNA expression, modify non-coding gene-regulatory regions, and manipulate higher-order chromatin structure. In this section, we focus on the application of CRISPR/Cas9 to study gene regulatory and epigenetic pathways in neurobiology contexts.

Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 techniques to human induced pluripotent stem cell models

In this section, we provide a brief overview of human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based models and highlight recent advances in the field that have used CRISPR/Cas9 strategies to study gene-regulatory processes in neuropsychiatric disease.

Future directions

In the next section, we discuss ways in which advances in CRISPR/Cas9 technology may further expand our understanding of neuropsychiatric disease. See Fig. 2 for an illustration of these processes.

Summary

Neurological and psychiatric diseases frequently involve pathogenic alterations in gene-regulatory and epigenetic processes. With the advent of CRISPR/Cas9, targeted manipulation of a variety of regulatory factors, non-protein-coding sequences, and non-coding RNAs can now explore the role of these pathways in neuropsychiatric conditions. Future approaches will expand the ability of CRISPR/Cas9 to effect specific perturbations in epigenetic pathways. By applying these new tools to a variety of

Acknowledgments

Kristen Brennand is a New York Stem Cell Foundation - Robertson Investigator. This work was partially supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 MH101454 (KJB) and R01 MH106056 (SA) and P50 MH096890 (SA), as well as the New York Stem Cell Foundation and the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation.

References (140)

  • D.C. Crawford et al.

    FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: human genome epidemiology review

    Genet. Med.

    (2001)
  • H. Dong et al.

    Genomic sequence and expression analyses of human chromatin assembly factor 1 p150 gene

    Gene

    (2001)
  • C.M. Egan et al.

    CHD5 is required for neurogenesis and has a dual role in facilitating gene expression and polycomb gene repression

    Dev. Cell

    (2013)
  • Y. Guo et al.

    CRISPR inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function

    Cell

    (2015)
  • S.M. Ho et al.

    Rapid Ngn2-induction of excitatory neurons from hiPSC-derived neural progenitor cells

    Methods

    (2016)
  • P.D. Kaufman et al.

    The p150 and p60 subunits of chromatin assembly factor I: a molecular link between newly synthesized histones and DNA replication

    Cell

    (1995)
  • D.G. Lupianez et al.

    Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions

    Cell

    (2015)
  • J.K. Millar et al.

    Chromosomal location and genomic structure of the human translin-associated factor X gene (TRAX; TSNAX) revealed by intergenic splicing to DISC1, a gene disrupted by a translocation segregating with schizophrenia

    Genomics

    (2000)
  • J.D. Miller et al.

    Human iPSC-based modeling of late-onset disease via progerin-induced aging

    Cell Stem Cell

    (2013)
  • C.Y. Park et al.

    Reversion of FMR1 methylation and silencing by editing the triplet repeats in fragile X iPSC-derived neurons

    Cell Rep.

    (2015)
  • C.J. Peña et al.

    Epigenetic signaling in psychiatric disorders

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2014)
  • H. Peng et al.

    Over-expression of CHAF1A promotes cell proliferation and apoptosis resistance in glioblastoma cells via AKT/FOXO3a/Bim pathway

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (2016)
  • L.S. Qi et al.

    Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression

    Cell

    (2013)
  • F.A. Ran et al.

    Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity

    Cell

    (2013)
  • M.D. Rannals et al.

    Psychiatric risk gene transcription factor 4 regulates intrinsic excitability of prefrontal neurons via repression of SCN10a and KCNQ1

    Neuron

    (2016)
  • P. Roussos et al.

    A role for noncoding variation in schizophrenia

    Cell Rep.

    (2014)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (2013)
  • V. Balachandar et al.

    A review of Rett syndrome (RTT) with induced pluripotent stem cells

    Stem Cell Investig.

    (2016)
  • E. Barbieri et al.

    A p53 drug response signature identifies prognostic genes in high-risk neuroblastoma

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • E. Barbieri et al.

    Histone chaperone CHAF1A inhibits differentiation and promotes aggressive neuroblastoma

    Cancer Res.

    (2014)
  • C. Bardy et al.

    Predicting the functional states of human iPSC-derived neurons with single-cell RNA-seq and electrophysiology

    Mol. Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • A. Bolotin et al.

    Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin

    Microbiology

    (2005)
  • K.J. Brennand et al.

    Modelling schizophrenia using human induced pluripotent stem cells

    Nature

    (2011)
  • T. Chailangkarn et al.

    A human neurodevelopmental model for Williams syndrome

    Nature

    (2016)
  • J.E. Chubb et al.

    The DISC locus in psychiatric illness

    Mol. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • K. Chylinski et al.

    Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-Cas systems

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2014)
  • B. Coffee et al.

    Acetylated histones are associated with FMR1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells

    Nat. Genet.

    (1999)
  • S. De Rubeis et al.

    Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism

    Nature

    (2014)
  • E. Deltcheva et al.

    CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III

    Nature

    (2011)
  • J.A. Doudna et al.

    Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9

    Science

    (2014)
  • L. Emdad et al.

    Efficient differentiation of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells into functional astrocytes

    Stem Cells Dev.

    (2012)
  • J.A. Erwin et al.

    L1-associated genomic regions are deleted in somatic cells of the healthy human brain

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2016)
  • A. Espinosa-Jeffrey et al.

    Efficient generation of viral and integration-free human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived oligodendrocytes

    Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol.

    (2016)
  • M.A. Faghihi et al.

    Expression of a noncoding RNA is elevated in Alzheimer's disease and drives rapid feed-forward regulation of beta-secretase

    Nat. Med.

    (2008)
  • W.A. Flavahan et al.

    Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas

    Nature

    (2016)
  • S.E. Folstein et al.

    Etiology of autism: genetic influences

    Pediatrics

    (1991)
  • C.L. Frank et al.

    Regulation of chromatin accessibility and Zic binding at enhancers in the developing cerebellum

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • M. Fromer et al.

    Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2016)
  • H. Fujii et al.

    Isolation of specific genomic regions and identification of their associated molecules by engineered DNA-binding molecule-mediated chromatin immunoprecipitation (enChIP) using the CRISPR system and TAL proteins

    Int. J. Mol. Sci.

    (2015)
  • T. Fujita et al.

    Identification of proteins associated with an IFNgamma-responsive promoter by a retroviral expression system for enChIP using CRISPR

    PLoS One

    (2014)
  • Cited by (20)

    • Unexplored power of CRISPR-Cas9 in neuroscience, a multi-OMICs review

      2024, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
    • ASCL1- and DLX2-induced GABAergic neurons from hiPSC-derived NPCs

      2020, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moving towards a more physiologically relevant context will facilitate studies of cell autonomous and non-cell autonomous effects across patient- and control-derived cell types. Moreover, being highly amenable to lentiviral transduction, we anticipate the straightforward application of CRISPR-based genomic engineering approaches (Powell et al., 2017), including techniques such as CRISPR activation and inhibition (CRISPRa/i) that we have already applied to NGN2-neurons (Ho et al., 2017). Ultimately, this will likely be a useful platform for modeling neuropsychiatric disorders, functional validation of disease-associated variants identified by large-scale genetic studies, and high throughput drug screening.

    • CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene knockout of Glb1 gene in mouse embryonic fibroblasts

      2019, Gene Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, researchers introduced cytokines such as caspases, interleukin 1 beta, and interleukin 33 as targets for pharmaceutical studies with the aim to find therapeutic solutions for GM1 gangliosidosis (Son et al., 2015). Researchers have shown great interest in the use of cellular models for discovering novel therapeutic methods such as drug therapy and chemical therapy (Yang et al., 2016; Yan et al., 2018; Powell et al., 2017). Research projects have focused on finding quick and suitable strategies that are capable of using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in order to treat neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases (LaMarca et al., 2018; Duru et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text