Abstract

In this research article, by introducing a mapping defined on , with some axioms, we define two generalized contractions called -contractions and -contractions. We investigate their mutual relation and establish an existence theorem addressing -contractions with some applications.

1. Introduction

Frechet gave an abstraction to the notion of distance in Euclidean spaces by introducing metric spaces. Partial metrics (denoted by ) were introduced in [1] as a generalization of the notion of metric to allow nonzero self-distance for the purpose of modeling partial objects in reasoning about data flow networks. The self-distance is to be understood as a quantification of the extent to which is unknown. Matthews [1] proved an analogue of Banach’s fixed point theorem in partial metric spaces. This remarkable fixed point theorem led many researchers to investigate fixed points of self-mappings in partial metric spaces (see [27]).

The investigation of fixed points of multivalued or set-valued mappings was started by Nadler [8]. For this purpose, Nadler introduced a metric function to measure distance between two nonempty closed and bounded sets. This metric function is also known as the Hausdorff metric in literature. Aydi et al. [5] generalized the Hausdorff metric to the partial Hausdorff metric and hence generalized the Nadler fixed point theorem. Nazam et al. [7] established various fixed point results using the partial Hausdorff metric. Recently, Pathak et al. [9] introduced another metric function to measure the distance between two nonempty closed and bounded sets and hence proved some fixed point results. Nashine et al. [10] also proved some fixed points theorems on -multivalued contractions and their application to homotopy theory. For recent research in this direction, see [1113].

In 1922, Banach introduced the Banach Contraction Principle in his PhD thesis. Since then, there has been a trend to generalize and apply it to show the existence of the solutions to various mathematical models (both linear and nonlinear). A large number of research articles contain many useful generalizations of Banach Contraction Principle. In one such attempt, Wardowski [14] introduced -contractions, where represents the class of nonlinear real-valued functions satisfying three axioms (). The concept of -contractions proved to be a useful addition in fixed point theory (see for instant [1518] and references therein). The advancement in the study of -contraction is in progress, and in this direction recently, Abbas et al. [19] introduced the Presic-type -contraction and established a fixed point theorem for such kind of mappings. Tomar et al. [20] provided an existence theorem for six self-mappings under the notion of -contraction. Durmaz et al. [17] studied -contraction under the effect of a partial order. Sgroi et al. [21] extended the notion of -contraction to multivalued -contraction by combining the ideas of Wardowski and Nadler. Durmaz et al. [22] generalized the results given in [16, 17, 21] by introducing -contraction. Similarly, Piri et al. [23] proved some theorems on the -Suzuki type inequalities under some weaker conditions, and Shukla et al. [24] established a common fixed point theorem for weak -contraction under 0-complete partial metric spaces. Recently, Karapinar et al. [25] presented a survey paper which encompasses almost all the results addressing -contractions.

The motivation to write this article is the contents of the article [26]. In [26], authors introduced a function (called auxiliary function) defined on satisfying some axioms and used it to establish a fixed point theorem. It was then shown that the Banach fixed point theorem, Kannan fixed point theorem, Chatterjea fixed point theorem, Reich fixed point theorem, Hardy and Rogers fixed point theorem, and Círíc type fixed point theorems are particular cases of this fixed point theorem. Since all the above mentioned fixed point theorems have been generalized using the notion of -contraction both in metric spaces and partial metric spaces (see [25]), we develop a general fixed point theorem, representing them all, in the Hausdorff partial metric spaces.

This article is organized as follows. In Section 2, some basic notions are given. In Section 3, we give highlights of Hausdorff p-ms. In Section 4, we introduce the -contractions and -contractions and investigate the relations between them. We also study the existence theorem and its consequences. And in Section 5, we derive two results regarding applications by applying the existence theorem given in Section 4. The presented existence theorem generalizes, improves, and extends the results established by Pathak et al. [9].

2. Basic Notions

Let partial metric spaces be denoted by p-m-s.

Matthews [1], while working on networking topologies, noticed the nonzero self-distance (loop is the best example to understand his point). The self-distance played a key role in introduction of p-m-s. Matthews [1] defined the p-m-s as follows: let be a nonempty set, and the function is said to be a partial metric (p-m) on if for all , the axioms (p1)-(p4) are satisfied.

(p1)

(p2)

(p3)

(p4)

Some examples of are as follows. The function defined by (1) for all is a (2) is a (3), is a .

It is noted that implies . The p-m function is continuous. If is a p-m then the function defined by defines a metric on . A topology can be defined on with -open balls being its elements. The -open ball centered at having radius is defined by . A set is said to be bounded in if there exist and such that for all . Also it is easy to write (closure of ) and is closed in if and only if . If ; then we say that converges to and conversely. If is finite, then the sequence is said to be Cauchy, and in particular, if this Cauchy sequence converges in , then we say that the p-m-s is complete. Lemma 1 provides fundamental rules to work in the p-m-s.

Lemma 1 [1]. (1)If the sequence is Cauchy sequence in , then it is Cauchy sequence in the metric space and conversely(2)The completeness of implies the completeness of and conversely(3), provided is complete.

Remark 1. There are sequences which converge in p-m-s but not in metric spaces. Indeed, for the sequence in and p-m defined by , it is easy to check that the sequence converges to with respect to but does not converge to with respect to metric defined by if and otherwise.

3. Hausdorff Partial Metric

Let the set of nonempty closed and bounded subsets of be denoted by . Let , . Let be defined by . Let be defined by

Let be defined by

Since , for all . A comprehensive study of the distance with reference to metric was presented by Pathak et al. in [9]. We claim that (a) and are topological equivalent(b)the mapping defines a p-m on (c)if the p-m-s is complete then is also complete and vice versa(d)the mapping is continuous.

Proposition 1 [7]. Let be p-m-s. For any , we have the following: (1)(2)(3) (4)

Proposition 2. Let be p-m-s. For any , we have the following: (1) implies (2)(3)(4)

Proof. Following the arguments given in ([5], Proposition 2.2 and Proposition 2.3), we get the result. We omit its details.
-contraction: Let be a p-m-s, the mapping is called an -contraction, if there exists such that for all (see [7]).
-contraction: Let be a p-m-s; the mapping is called an -contraction, if (1) there exists such that for all ; (2) for all , , there exists such that (see [27]).
Since for all , -contraction implies -contraction but not conversely (see Example 1).

Example 1. Let. Define the functionby

Then is a p-m-s. Let be defined by

We have three cases (Case 1: , Case 2: , and Case 3: ).

Case 1. If , then , , and . This clearly shows that whereas

Case 2. If , then , , and . This clearly shows that whereas

Case 3. If , then , , and . This clearly shows that whereas

Note: the inequality also holds for each case, and for all , , .

4. Fixed Points of -Contraction

Let be a self-mapping defined on nonempty set . The problem “to find such that is called fixed point problem. If , then the fixed point problem turns into the form “to find such that .” For the solution of fixed point problem, generally, a Picard iterative sequence is proved to be a Cauchy sequence subject to contractive condition and completeness of the underlying abstract metric space leads to such . In this section, at first, we introduce and compare -contraction and -contraction, and secondly, we obtain a theorem assuring unique fixed point of -contraction. We proceed with definitions of functions and associated with some axioms.

Wardowski [14] considered a nonlinear function with the following axioms: (): is strictly increasing. (): For each sequence of positive numbers, if and only if (): For each sequence of positive numbers , there exists such that . Let .

The collection is nonempty: , , , and are members of this collection.

Let us consider the function satisfying the following axioms:

(C1) is continuous and non-decreasing in each coordinate

(C2) if there exist such that then

(C3) if there exists such that then .

Let . The following examples show that the set is nonempty: (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)

Definition 1. Let and be two functions. A mapping is said to be strictly -admissible if for each and with , there exists such that .

Definition 2. Let be a p-m-s and let be a function. The space is said to be strictly -regular if for any sequence such that for all and as, we have for all

Definition 3. Let be a p-m-s. A mapping is said to be a -contraction if there exist and such that for all .

Let

Definition 4. Let be a p-m-s. A mapping is said to be an -contraction if (a)there exist , and such thatfor all . (b)For every , , and , there exists such that

Remark 2. In particular if , then for , the inequality (13) turns into -contraction [9] for .

Proposition 3. Every -contraction is an -contraction, but the converse may not be true.

Proof. Let be a -contraction defined on ; then for all there exist and such that This can be written as Let be defined by for all and put . The inequality (16) leads to

The following example (Example 2) shows that an -contraction needs not to be a -contraction.

Example 2. Let and defined by where . Let equipped with p-m defined by

Then, is a p-m-s. Define the mapping by

The mapping is -admissible, closed, and bounded. We show that this mapping satisfies inequality (13) for all . We observe that if and only if and . Also for all with and taking , we have and thus

Consequently,

Hence,

Similarly, for every member of , the mapping is -contraction. However, the mapping is not -contraction: for and , we have which then gives , and implies , a contradiction. Hence, is not -contraction for this particular member of . Similarly, for and , we have

Hence, is not -contraction for this member of . The mapping has similar nature for other members of .

The following theorem (Theorem 1) gives the proof of all particular problems corresponding to members of in one attempt.

Theorem 1. Let be a complete p-m-s and be an -contraction such that (1) is a strictly -admissible mapping(2) and in such that (3) is a strictly -regular space(4) is continuous.

Then, there exists such that .

Proof. By assumption (2), there exist and in such that . Note that if , then is a fixed point of , and if , then is a fixed point of as required. We proceed by assuming and ; thus, . Given and are nonempty, closed, and bounded sets, so, by Definition 4(b), there exists such that Letting , we have By , (13) and , we have By the triangular inequality, we have We claim that . On the contrary, if , then due to (29), we get . The inequality (28) implies By , we have , and by axiom , the inequality (30) reduces to This is an absurdity. This indicates that our claim is valid. Thus, . Let for all positive integers , and by inequality (28) we obtain Applying and consecutively, we have Since is a strictly -admissible mapping, implies ; thus, (assume ). Since, are nonempty, closed, and bounded sets. By Definition 4(b), there exists such that Letting , we have By , (13) and , we have By the triangular inequality, we have We claim that . On the contrary, if , then by (37), we get . The inequality (36) implies By , . By and (38), we have This is an absurdity. Thus, . By (36), we obtain Again applying the condition followed by , we have Similarly, there exists , such that Thus, we are able to construct an iterative sequence such that By (44), we obtain , by we have , and by , there exists such that Following (44), for all we obtain Letting , in (46), we have ; thus, there exists such that for all , that is .
For , Since the series on the right hand side is convergent and by definition of metric defined on , we know that ; thus, . This implies is a Cauchy sequence in . Since is complete, so by Lemma 1(2), the metric space is complete. Thus, there exists such that as with respect to metric . Then Lemma 1(3) implies This shows that is a Cauchy sequence in . Now, we show that , and to do so, we claim that . If on the other hand , then there exists such that for each . By assumption (3), . By (13), Thus, Since is a coordinate-wise continuous function, letting in the above inequality, we obtain By , we have This is an absurdity and consequently ; thus, we have which implies that . Hence, is a fixed point of .

The following example explains Theorem 1.

Example 3. Consistent with ([28], Example 3.3), let where and defined by . Let equipped with p-m defined by

Then, is a complete p-m-s. Define the mapping by

The mapping is strict -admissible, closed, and bounded. We show that is -contraction. We observe that if and only if and . Also for all with and taking , we have

Consequently,

Hence,

Similarly, for every member of , the mapping satisfies all assumptions in Theorem 1. As it is clear from Proposition 3 that -contraction needs not to be -contraction, and hence, it is not -contraction. Consequently, -contraction needs not to be -contraction. Thus, the results in [9, 10, 27] are not applicable in this case.

Remark 3. In the following section, we obtain the corollaries of Theorem 1. To simplify the expression of the corollaries, we consider the three conditions below.
Let
(A1) there exist in such that
(A2) be a strictly -regular space
(A3) be continuous.

Corollary 1. Let be a complete p-m-s and be a strictly -admisible mapping. Assume that for all , and for every , , and , there exists such that

Then, the mapping has a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. Defining by and following the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain the result.

Corollary 2. Let be a complete p-m-s and be a strictly -admisible mapping. Assume that for all , and for every , , and , such that

Then, admits a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. Defining by and following the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain the result.

Corollary 3. Let be a complete p-m-s and be a strictly -admissible mapping. Assume that for all , and for every , , and , there exists such that

Then, admits a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. Defining by and following the steps given in the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain the result.

Corollary 4. Let be a complete p-m-s and be a strictly -admissible mapping. Assume that for all , and for every , , and , there exists such that

Then, admits a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. Defining by and following the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain the result.

Corollary 5. Let be a complete p-m-s and be a strictly -admissible mapping. Assume that for all , and for every , , and , there exists such that

Then, admits a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. Defining by in the proof of Theorem 1, we get the result.

Corollary 6. Let be a complete p-m-s and be a strictly -admissible mapping. Assume that for all , and for every , , and , there exists such that

Then, admits a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. Defining by in the proof of Theorem 1, we get the result.

Corollary 7. Let be a complete p-m-s and be strictly -admissible mapping. Assume that for all , and for every , , and , there exists such that

Then, admits a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. Defining by and following the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain the result.

Corollary 8. Let be a complete p-m-s and be strictly -admisible mapping. Assume that there exist satisfying , such that for all , and for every , , and , there exists such that

Then, admits a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. Defining by in the proof of Theorem 1, we obtain the result.

Corollary 9. Let be a complete p-m-s and be a strictly -admissible mapping. Assume that there exist satisfying , such that for all , and for every , , and , there exists such that

Then, admits a fixed point provided (A1)-(A3) hold.

Proof. If we define by in the proof of Theorem 1, then the result follows.
Let

For a single-valued self-mapping, Theorem 1 can be stated as follows:

Theorem 2. Let be a complete p-m-s and be a -contraction, that is, there exist and such that for all and (1) is a strictly -admissible mapping(2)there exists in such that (3) is a strictly -regular space(4) is continuous.

Then, admits a fixed point.

We omit its proof as it is a mere repetition of the proof of Theorem 1 with some minor modifications.

5. Applications of Theorem 2

5.1. Applications to Fractional Differential Equations

Lacroix (1819) introduced and investigated several applicable properties of fractional differentials. Recently, various new models involving Caputo-Fabrizio derivative (CFD) were discovered and analyzed in [2931]. We investigate one of these models in p-m-s. We introduce some notations as follows:

Let . Define the metric function by

Then, the space is a complete metric space. The function by

Let be a continuous function. We shall investigate the following CFDE: with boundary conditions

Here, denotes CFD of order defined by where and is given by

Then, the equation (90) can be modified to

Theorem 3. Equation (90) admits a solution inprovided(I)there exists such that for all , we have(II)there exists such that for all , we have

Proof. Consistent with the notations introduced above and defining the mapping by

By (II), there exists such that . The continuity of function leads to the continuity of mapping on . It is easy to verify the assumptions (1)-(4) in Theorem 2. In the following, we verify the contractive condition (87) of Theorem 2. where is the beta function. The last inequality can be written by that

Let us define the metric on by

Thus, (100) can be written as

Define the functions and by

for all . Under these definitions, the inequality (102) gets the form

Hence, by Theorem 2, the self-mapping admits a fixed point, and hence, the equation (90) has a solution.

5.2. Applications to the Matrix Equations

In this section, by Theorem 2, we shall investigate study the existence of the solutions to

where , (set of positive definite matrices), and are arbitrary matrices for each and are entries of block matrices given by

Let (set of Hermitian matrices) be an arbitrary matrix; then, its eigenvalues are real. Moreover, if , then the eigenvalues are nonnegative. Let the functional be defined by

Let be arbitrary and define . By ([32], Theorem IX.2.2), is a Banach space (see also [3335]). Hence, is a complete metric space. The induced metric is defined by

To establish the existence result we need the following lemma.

Lemma 2 [35]. If , then

Define the operator by

Remark 4. Since for all , in particular, we have . The operator is continuous on .

The solution of the matrix equation (105) is the fixed point of the operator .

Theorem 4. Let and be two positive definite matrices such that and . Then, the operator has a fixed point in .

Proof. Let and be any matrices in . We observe that the operator and the space fulfill the assumptions (1)-(4) in Theorem 2. To prove that is an -contraction, we proceed with Given , , and letting be a number such that Thus, We define by and the metric on by In view of the metric defined above, the inequality (113) can be written as Define the functions and by for all , respectively. Under these definitions, we have By Theorem 2, the operator has a fixed point, and hence, the matrix equation (105) has a solution.

Remark 5. The numerical explanation of the conditions and imposed in Theorem 4 for and taking matrices is as follows:

Then, for a matrix we have

Then, for a matrix we have

6. Conclusion

The introduced contractions encompass the -contractions and multivalued contractions and hence the Banach contractions, Kannan contractions, Chatterjea contractions, Reich contractions, Hardy-Rogers contractions, and Ciric-type contractions (both metric and p-m versions). It is a real generalization of Matthews contractions and -contractions. The theorems give general criteria for the existence of the uniqueness of the fixed point.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Sang Og Kim thanks to the Hallym University Research Fund, 2020 (HRF-202007-017).