Go to
current issue
-
The Real Political Question Doctrine Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-05-31 Curtis A. Bradley & Eric A. Posner
Abstract not available
-
-
Untangling Laundered Funds Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-05-31 Audrey Spensley
Abstract not available
-
An Opportunity for Feminist Constitutionalism Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-05-31 Grace Kavinsky
Abstract not available
-
Sex Exceptionalism in Criminal Law Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-04-30 Aya Gruber
Abstract not available
-
Civil Probation Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-04-30 Nicole Summers
Abstract not available
-
Closed Loophole, Open Ports Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-04-30 Matthew M. Higgins
Abstract not available
-
Fashion Designers Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-04-30 Lisa Wang
Abstract not available
-
Valuing Medical Innovation Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-03-28 Daniel J. Hemel & Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Abstract not available
-
Reversing Reverse Mainstreaming Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-03-28 Yaron Covo
Abstract not available
-
Self-Imposed Agency Deadlines Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-03-28 Mariah Mastrodimos
Abstract not available
-
The Caregiver Conundrum Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-03-28 Grace Rehaut
Abstract not available
-
How Immigration Detention Became Exceptional Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-02-27 Paulina D. Arnold
Abstract not available
-
The Petition Clause and the Constitutional Mandate of Total-Population Apportionment Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-02-27 J. Colin Bradley
Abstract not available
-
Imperialism and Black Dissent Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-02-27 Nina Farnia
Abstract not available
-
The Constitutional Case for Clear and Convincing Evidence in Bail Hearings Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-02-27 Marty Berger
Abstract not available
-
Trademark Spaces and Trademark Law’s Secret Step Zero Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-01-30 Mark A. Lemley & Mark P. McKenna
Abstract not available
-
Hierarchy, Race, and Gender in Legal Scholarly Networks Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-01-30 Keerthana Nunna, W. Nicholson Price II & Jonathan Tietz
Abstract not available
-
The Negotiable Implementation of Environmental Law Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-01-30 Dave Owen
Abstract not available
-
Teaching in the Upside Down: What Anti-Critical Race Theory Laws Tell Us About the First Amendment Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2023-01-30 Tess Bissell
Abstract not available
-
Vesting Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-06-17 Jed Handelsman Shugerman
Abstract not available
-
Beyond “Market Transparency” Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-06-16 Alexander I. Platt
Abstract not available
-
Cop-“Like” (“👍”) Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-06-15 Jonathan Abel
Abstract not available
-
Mass Arbitration Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-06-15 J. Maria Glover
Abstract not available
-
Regulatory Diffusion Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-05-31 Jennifer Nou & Julian Nyarko
Abstract not available
-
Grid Reliability Through Clean Energy Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-05-31 Alexandra Klass, Joshua Macey, Shelley Welton & Hannah Wiseman
Abstract not available
-
The Regulation of Foreign Platforms Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-05-31 Ganesh Sitaraman
Abstract not available
-
Climate Protagonists? Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-05-31 Catherine Rocchi
Abstract not available
-
Regulatory Arbitrage and the Persistence of Financial Misconduct Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-04-30 Colleen Honigsberg, Edwin Hu & Robert J. Jackson, Jr.
Abstract not available
-
Due Process in Removal Proceedings After Thuraissigiam Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-04-30 Diana G. Li
Abstract not available
-
Digital Eyewitnesses Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-04-30 Bailey R. Ulbricht, Christopher Moxley, Mackenzie D. Austin & Molly D. Norburg
Abstract not available
-
Corporate Governance and the Feminization of Capital Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-03-31 Sarah C. Haan
Abstract not available
-
Brown and Red Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-03-31 Gregory Briker & Justin Driver
Abstract not available
-
The Broken Fourth Amendment Oath Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-03-31 Laurent Sacharoff
Abstract not available
-
Modern Vacancies, Ancient Remedy Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-03-31 Taylor Nicolas
Abstract not available
-
Getting Public Rights Wrong Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-02-28 Gregory Ablavsky
Abstract not available
-
Sequencing in Damages Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-02-28 Edward K. Cheng, Ehud Guttel & Yuval Procaccia
Abstract not available
-
Against Geofences Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-02-28 Haley Amster & Brett Diehl
Abstract not available
-
Restructuring Public Defense After Padilla Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-01-31 Ingrid Eagly, Tali Gires, Rebecca Kutlow & Eliana Navarro Gracian
Abstract not available
-
Participatory Litigation Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-01-31 Jules Lobel
Abstract not available
-
The Bribery Double Standard Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-01-31 Anna A. Mance & Dinsha Mistree
Abstract not available
-
Education Equity During COVID-19 Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2022-01-31 Bruce A. Easop
Abstract not available
-
Qualified and Absolute Immunity at Common Law Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2021-06-29 Scott A. Keller
Qualified immunity has become one of the Supreme Court’s most controversial doctrines. But while there has been plenty of commentary criticizing the Court’s existing clearly-established-law test, there has been no thorough historical analysis examining the complicated subject of state-officer immunities under nineteenth-century common law. Yet the legitimacy of state-officer immunities, under the Court’s
-
Policing Under Disability Law Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2021-06-19 Jamelia N. Morgan
In recent years, there has been increased attention to the problem of police violence against disabled people. Disabled people are overrepresented in police killings and, in a number of cities, police use-of-force incidents. Further, though police violence dominates the discussion of policing, disabled people also disproportionately experience more ordinary forms of policing that can lead to police
-
Traffic Without the Police Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2021-06-19 Jordan Blair Woods
We are at a watershed moment in which growing national protest and public outcry over police injustice and brutality, especially against people of color, are animating new meanings of public safety and new proposals for structural police reforms. Traffic stops are the most frequent interaction between police and civilians today, and they are a persistent source of racial and economic injustice. Black
-
Finality, Comity, and Retroactivity in Criminal Procedure Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2021-06-19 Jeffrey G. Ho
The Supreme Court’s habeas corpus retroactivity jurisprudence has never been a model of clarity or fairness. Ordinarily, if a case is on direct review, a court is bound to apply constitutional law as it currently stands, not the law as it stood at the time of trial, conviction, or sentencing. This rule derives fromGriffith v. Kentucky,in which the Supreme Court held that the Constitution requires that
-
Indirect Constraints on the Office of Legal Counsel Stanford Law Review (IF 5.04) Pub Date : 2021-06-19 William S. Janover
As arbiter of the constitutionality of executive actions, the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) possesses vast authority over the operation of the federal government and is one of the primary vessels for the articulation of executive power. It therefore is not surprising that the OLC has found itself at the center of controversy across Democratic and Republican administrations. OLC
Copyright © 2014-2023 北京衮雪科技有限公司 All Rights Reserved
京ICP备11026495-2号
京公网安备 11010802027423号
京公网安备 11010802027423号