样式: 排序: IF: - GO 导出 标记为已读
-
Better to be a Pig Dissatisfied than a Plant Satisfied J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2024-03-07 Ethan C. Terrill, Walter Veit
In the last two decades, there has been a blossoming literature aiming to counter the neglect of plant capacities. In their recent paper, Miguel Segundo-Ortin and Paco Calvo begin by providing an overview of the literature to then question the mistaken assumptions that led to plants being immediately rejected as candidates for sentience. However, it appears that many responses to their arguments are
-
Ethical Challenges in Mariculture: Adopting a Feminist Blue Humanities Approach J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2024-02-10 Jesse D. Peterson
As mariculture—the cultivation of aquatic organisms in marine environment—intensifies to meet the demands of sustainable blue growth and national policies, novel ethical challenges will arise. In the context of ethics, primary concerns over aquaculture and mariculture tend to stay within differing value-based perspectives focused on benefits to human and non-human subjects, specifically animal welfare
-
Shallow vs. Deep Geoethics: Moving Beyond Anthropocentric Views J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2024-01-04 Giovanni Frigo, Luiz Anselmo Ifanger, Roberto Greco, Helen Kopnina, Rafaela Hillerbrand
At its inception, geoethics was envisioned as a type of professional ethics concerned with the moral implications of geoscientific research, applications, and practices. More recently, however, some scholars have proposed versions of geoethics as public and global ethics. To better understand these developments, this article considers the relationship between geoethics and environmental ethics by exploring
-
Plantationocene: A Framework For Understanding the Links Between Ecological Destruction and Social Inequalities J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-12-07 Ennan Wu, Yichang Xu
-
Societal Acceptability of Insect-Based Livestock Feed: A Qualitative Study from Europe J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-11-04 Ingrid Bunker, Jana Zscheischler
-
A Kantian Approach to the Moral Considerability of Non-human Nature J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-10-30 Toby Svoboda
A Kantian approach can establish that non-human natural entities are morally considerable and that humans have duties to them. This is surprising, because most environmental ethicists have either rejected or overlooked Kant when it comes to this issue. Inspired by an argument of Christine Korsgaard, I claim that both humans and non-humans have a natural good, which is whatever allows an entity to function
-
Politically Branding India’s “First Fully Organic State”: Re-Signification of Traditional Practices and Markets in Organic Agriculture J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-09-21 Suchismita Das
-
Climate Injustice in a More-Than-Human World J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-09-04 Alfonso Donoso
The climate crisis has implications for the idea of justice. The paper explores this idea to inquire whether climate change wrongs animals and, if it does, how these wrongs are constitutive of an injustice. The first question is answered in the positive to then propose an answer to the second question through an account of climate injustice articulated as a problem of distribution of ecological space
-
Strategies for Increasing Participation of Diverse Consumers in a Community Seafood Program J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Talia Young, Gabriel Cumming, Ellie Kerns, Kristin Hunter-Thomson, Harmony Lu, Tamara Manik-Perlman, Cassandra Manotham, Tasha Palacio, Narry Veang, Wenxin Weng, Feini Yin, Cara Cuite
-
An assessment of 'Inclusive' Business Models: Vehicles for Development, or Neo-Colonial Practices? J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-07-20 Ellen Mangnus
In a period of decreasing aid budgets and increasing private sector engagement in the Global South, Inclusive Business-referring to a business model that integrates marginalized people in the company’s value chain as suppliers, distributors, retailers, or customers to the mutual benefit of both the company and the community has become a preferred development strategy. However so far the impacts of
-
Connecting the Concepts of Frugality and Inclusion to Appraise Business Practices in Systems of Food Provisioning: A Kenyan Case Study J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-07-10 Sietze Vellema, Greetje Schouten, Peter Knorringa
-
Intra-Acting Food Citizenship in Community-Supported Agriculture in Finland J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-06-24 Anni Turunen, Riikka Aro, Suvi Huttunen
-
From Blind Spot to Crucial Concept: On the Role of Animal Welfare in Food System Changes towards Circular Agriculture J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-06-20 Franck L.B. Meijboom, Jan Staman, Ru Pothoven
-
Food Waste and Power Relations in the Agri-Food Chain. The Fruit Sector in Lleida (Catalonia, Spain) J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-05-26 Jordi Gascón, Cristina Larrea-Killinger, Carlota Solà
-
Public Awareness, Attitude and Empathy Regarding the Management of Surplus Dairy Calves J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-05-02 Mareike Herrler, Mizeck G. G. Chagunda, Nanette Stroebele-Benschop
-
Grass-Fed Beef, Alterity, and Care: Complicating food Binaries, Relations, and Practices J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-05-02 Carley MacKay
Alternative food networks (AFNs) have become increasingly important in response to growing concerns about industrial animal agriculture’s harmful impacts on animals. Alternative animal agriculture seeks to address problems with industrial animal agriculture given its purported emphases on animal welfare and, more controversially, “happy” meat. Debates in critical food studies and animal studies literature
-
The 3D Method: A Tool to Analyze Positions in Animal and Environmental Ethics J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-04-08 Samuel Camenzind
Over the past fifty years numerous ethical and political traditions, and positions and sub-positions, have emerged in the fields of animal and environmental ethics. In combination with inconsistent terminology and axiological variation, this has made it difficult for both novices and professional scholars to maintain an overview of these fields. Referring to the preliminary work of Kenneth Goodpaster
-
Veganism and Its Challenges: The Case of Iceland J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-02-28 Ólafur Ögmundarson, Eugenio Luciano, Ólöf Guðný Geirsdóttir, Helga Ögmundardóttir
Our research discusses how four main ethical challenges to veganism manifest in the context of Iceland. Veganism is becoming an increasingly popular lifestyle in many parts of the world, especially in OECD countries. Studies on the motivation for choosing a vegan lifestyle (which includes, but is not restricted to, following a vegan diet) include ethical considerations, dietary choices, personal health
-
Capability Approach and Inclusion: Developing a Context Sensitive Design for Biobased Value Chains J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-02-17 Lotte Asveld, Zoë Houda Robaey, Sara Francke, Patricia Osseweijer
Biomass such as crops and agricultural waste is increasingly used as the primary resource for products like bioplastics and biofuels. Incorporating the needs, knowledge, skills and values of biomass producers in the design of global value chains – the steps involved in creating any finished product from design to delivery – can contribute to sustainability, reliability and fairness. However, how to
-
Right to Food and Geoengineering J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-02-10 Teea Kortetmäki, Markku Oksanen
Climate change poses grave risks to food security, and mitigation and adaptation actions have so far been insufficient to lessen the risk of climate-induced violations of the right to food. Could safeguarding the right to food, then, justify some forms of geoengineering? This article examines geoengineering through the analytical lens of the right to food. We look at the components of food security
-
The Political Salience of Animal Protection in the Netherlands (2012–2021) and Belgium (2010–2019): What do Dutch and Belgian Political Parties Pledge on Animal Welfare and Wildlife Conservation? J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-02-06 Annick Hus, Steven P. McCulloch
-
When is a Techno-Fix Legitimate? The Case of Viticultural Climate Resilience J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2023-02-04 Rune Nydal, Giovanni De Grandis, Lars Ursin
-
Entertaining Commodities or Living Beings? Public Perception of Animal Welfare at Local Festivals in South Korea J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-12-14 Seola Joo, Jaeye Bae, Yechan Jung, Myung-Sun Chun, Hyomin Park
Many festivals use animals in the name of continuing traditions and religious acts of historical and cultural relevance, as well as for tourist entertainment; however, the welfare of these animals has been overlooked in favor of maintaining cultural identity or making economic profits. The criticism of animal-based festivals has been growing along with the increased public awareness of animal rights
-
The Moral Pitfalls of Cultivated meat: Complementing Utilitarian Perspective with eco-republican Justice Approach J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-11-22 Cristian Moyano-Fernández
The context of accelerated climate change, environmental pollution, ecosystems depletion, loss of biodiversity and growing undernutrition has led human societies to a crossroads where food systems require transformation. New agricultural practices are being advocated in order to achieve food security and face environmental challenges. Cultivated meat has recently been considered one of the most desired
-
Justice and Inclusiveness: The Reconfiguration of Global–Local Relationships in Sustainability Initiatives in Ghana’s Cocoa Sector J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-11-21 Faustina Obeng Adomaa, Sietze Vellema, Maja Slingerland
Pressure from the public and non-governmental organisations is pushing lead companies in the cocoa and chocolate sectors towards becoming more environmentally sustainable and socially just. Because of this, several sustainability programmes, certification schemes and delivery initiatives have been introduced. These have changed the relationship between chocolate companies, cocoa exporters, and small-scale
-
From here to Utopia: Theories of Change in Nonideal Animal Ethics J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-11-03 Nico Dario Müller
Animal ethics has often been criticized for an overreliance on “ideal” or even “utopian” theorizing. In this article, I recognize this problem, but argue that the “nonideal theory” which critics have offered in response is still insufficient to make animal ethics action-guiding. I argue that in order for animal ethics to be action-guiding, it must consider agent-centered theories of change detailing
-
Copping Out on Food Systems: How COP26 Failed to Address Food and Climate and How COP27 Can Solve It J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Chantal Wei-Ying Clément
-
Are Collective Trading Organisations Necessarily Inclusive of Smallholder Farmers?: A Comparative Analysis of Farmer-led Auctions in the Javanese Chilli Market J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-09-28 Dyah Woro Untari, Sietze Vellema
-
Opportunities and Challenges in Applying the 3Rs to Zoos and Aquariums J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-09-23 Sabrina Brando, Mickey Gjerris
Since Russell and Burch (1959) suggested the principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement (3Rs) as a foundation for animal research, their influence has only grown in the research community. In this paper, we discuss whether the 3Rs can be constructively used as a prism to analyse decisions regarding the welfare of animals housed in zoos and aquariums (henceforth “zoo animals”). We analyse
-
The Harm of Desire Modification in Non-human Animals: Circumventing Control, Diminishing Ownership and Undermining Agency J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-09-13 Marc G. Wilcox
It is seemingly bad for animals to have their desires modified in at least some cases, for instance where brainwashing or neurological manipulation takes place. In humans, many argue that such modification interferes with our positive liberty or undermines our autonomy but this explanation is inapplicable in the case of animals as they lack the capacity for autonomy in the relevant sense. As such,
-
The Food System Summit’s Disconnection From People’s Real Needs J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-08-17 Michael Fakhri
The United Nations (UN) Food Systems Summit held in September 2021 has left the world with a jumble of ideas and no clear path forward for transforming the world’s food systems. The Summit was touted as the ultimate place to provide the world with solutions – but it never clarified the problems with the dominant food systems leaving participants with no coherent or cohesive framework. Most distressingly
-
The Influence of Environmental Values on Consumer Intentions to Participate in Agritourism—A Model to Extend TPB J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-08-08 Zinan Zhao, Yongji Xue, Lili Geng, Ye Xu, Nyingone Ndongo Meline
-
The role of ethical reflection and dialogue in conceptualising animal welfare J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-07-19 Simon Coghlan
This paper argues that ethical reflection and dialogue can assist in understanding what animal welfare is. Questions about animal welfare’s nature are thorny and contested. Responding to an essay by Donald Bruckner, the paper acknowledges that animal welfare is a type of normative value (namely prudential value) distinct from ethical value and that the methodology for determining prudential value is
-
The Responsibility of Farmers, Public Authorities and Consumers for Safeguarding Bees Against Harmful Pesticides J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-07-13 Anna Birgitte Milford, Bjørn Arild Hatteland, Lars Øystein Ursin
-
The Impacts of Animal Farming: A Critical Overview of Primary School Textbooks J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-07-04 Rui Pedro Fonseca
-
A complex ball game: piglet castration as a dynamic and complex social issue in the EU J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-06-21 Li Lin-Schilstra, Paul T.M. Ingenbleek
-
Social Membership, Contribution, and Justice J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-06-21 Ryan Wilcox
Central to the social membership model of animal rights is the claim that relations with nonhuman animals should be reorganized such that domesticated animals are recognized as members of our shared societies. Though some elements of the membership model remain contested, the core of the membership model is that domesticated animals have a claim on, and a direct entitlement to, the benefits of cooperative
-
Ethical Values in a Post-Industrial Economy: The Case of the Organic Farmers’ Market in Granada (Spain) J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-05-09 Alfredo Macías Vázquez, José Antonio Morillas del Moral
The importance of the collective management of immaterial resources is a key variable in the valorisation of products in a post-industrial economy. The purpose of this paper is to analyse how, in post-industrial economies, it is possible to devise alternative forms of mediation between producers and consumers, such as organic farmers' markets, to curb the appropriation of rent by transnational and/or
-
The Ethics of Innovations in Genomic Selection: On How to Broaden the Scope of Discussion J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-04-22 K. Kramer, F. L. B. Meijboom
The use of genomic selection in agricultural animal breeding is in academic literature generally considered an ethically unproblematic development, but some critical views have been offered. Our paper shows that an important preliminary question for any ethical evaluation of (innovations in) genomic selection is how the scope of discussion should be set, that is, which ethical issues and perspectives
-
-
Motivations of Public Officials as Drivers of Transition to Sustainable School Food Provisioning: Insights from Avignon, France J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-04-02 Esther Sanz Sanz, Aurélie Cardona, Claude Napoléone
-
Agency and Autonomy in Food Choice: Can We Really Vote with Our Forks? J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-02-22 J. M. Dieterle
Ethical consumerism is the thesis that we should let our values determine our consumer purchases. We should purchase items that accord with our values and refrain from buying those that do not. The end goal, for ethical consumerism, is to transform the market through consumer demand. The arm of this movement associated with food choice embraces the slogan “Vote with Your Fork!” As in the more general
-
Automating Agroecology: How to Design a Farming Robot Without a Monocultural Mindset? J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-01-22 Lenora Ditzler, Clemens Driessen
Robots are widely expected—and pushed—to transform open-field agriculture, but these visions remain wedded to optimizing monocultural farming systems. Meanwhile there is little pull for automation from ecology-based, diversified farming realms. Noting this gap, we here explore the potential for robots to foster an agroecological approach to crop production. The research was situated in The Netherlands
-
Plants as Machines: History, Philosophy and Practical Consequences of an Idea J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2022-01-03 Sophie Gerber, Quentin Hiernaux
This paper elucidates the philosophical origins of the conception of plants as machines and analyses the contemporary technical and ethical consequences of that thinking. First, we explain the historical relationship between the explicit animal machine thesis of Descartes and the implicit plant machine thesis of today. Our hypothesis is that, although it is rarely discussed, the plant machine thesis
-
Quo Vadis, Bioeconomy? the Necessity of Normative Considerations in the Transition J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-12-16 Sophie Urmetzer, Michael P. Schlaile, Vincent Blok, Andreas Pyka
This collection of papers builds on the idea that the bioeconomy provides a framework for potentially effective solutions addressing the grand global challenges by a turn towards an increased use of biological resources, towards renewability and circularity. Consequently, it cannot be perceived as an end in itself. Thus, innovative endeavors within this bioeconomy framework require a serious examination
-
Glyphosate-Based Herbicides and Public Health: Making Sense of the Science J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-12-10 Sheldon Krimsky
The controversy over glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs), where there is extreme divergences in health and environmental assessments, is rooted in several methodological and normative factors. Foremost among them are the differences found in testing pure glyphosate compared to the testing of glyphosate formulations. The adjuvant chemicals found in formulations can be more toxic than the so-called “active
-
Welcoming, Wild Animals, and Obligations to Assist J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-11-27 Milburn, Josh
What we could call ‘relational non-interventionism’ holds that we have no general obligation to alleviate animal suffering, and that we do not typically have special obligations to alleviate wild animals’ suffering. Therefore, we do not usually have a duty to intervene in nature to alleviate wild animal suffering. However, there are a range of relationships that we may have with wild animals that do
-
Efficiency Versus Enjoyment: Looking After the Human Condition in the Transition to the Bio-Based Economy J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-11-27 Veraart, Roeland Christiaan, Blok, Vincent
In this paper, we criticize the current focus of the bio-based economy (BBE) on efficiency and control and demonstrate the contradictions that this causes. We elucidate these tensions by comparing the BBE to alternative conceptions of economy that emphasise the relevance of both the human condition and unfathomable nature in the macro ecological transition project. From Emmanuel Levinas’s philosophy
-
The Indispensability of Holistic Species Experts for Ethical Animal Research J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-11-24 Gibson, Julia D.
Committee composition is a recurrent theme within the literature on Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs). The ability of IACUCs to ensure the ethical treatment of nonhuman research subjects depends upon who makes up these committees. Non-scientists and those not affiliated with the research institution have been deemed indispensable for the democratic, objective review of protocols
-
Governance and Standardization in Fish Value Chains: Do They Take Care of Key Animal Welfare Issues? J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-09-29 Reis, Germano Glufke, Molento, Carla Forte Maiolino, Souza, Ana Paula Oliveira
This article discusses the extent to which Global Value Chain (GVC) governance may lead to animal welfare (AW) improvement and help to alleviate animal suffering in food producing chains. Our approach relied on scrutinizing two of the most used compulsory certification templates which are enforced by major buyers to their suppliers in order to assure responsible activity in the farmed fish chain (GlobalG
-
Minding the Gaps in Fish Welfare: The Untapped Potential of Fish Farm Workers J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-09-27 Medaas, Christian, Lien, Marianne E., Gismervik, Kristine, Kristiansen, Tore S., Osmundsen, Tonje, Størkersen, Kristine Vedal, Tørud, Brit, Stien, Lars Helge
The welfare of farmed fish is often regarded with less concern than the welfare of other husbandry animals, as fish are not universally classified as sentient beings. In Norway, farmed fish and other husbandry animals are legally protected under the same laws. Additionally, the legislature has defined a number of aquaculture-specific amendments, including mandatory welfare courses for fish farmers
-
Between Food and Respect for Nature: On the Moral Ambiguity of Norwegian Stakeholder Opinions on Fish and Their Welfare in Technological Innovations in Fisheries J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-09-07 Laursen, Danielle Caroline, Meijboom, Franck L. B.
Innovation in fisheries is a global development that focuses on a broad range of aims. One example is a project that aims to develop technology for key phases of the demersal fishery operation to improve product quality and safeguard fish welfare. As this step to include welfare is novel, it raises questions associated with stakeholder acceptance in a wider aim for responsible innovation. How do stakeholders
-
Stamping Out Animal Culling: From Anthropocentrism to One Health Ethics J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-08-29 Lederman, Zohar, Magalhães-Sant’Ana, Manuel, Voo, Teck Chuan
Culling is used in traditional public health policies to control animal populations. These policies aim primarily to protect human interests but often fail to provide scientific evidence of effectiveness. In this article, we defend the need to move from a strictly anthropocentric approach to disease control towards a One Health ethics, using culling practices as an example. We focus on the recent badger
-
Should we Ascribe Capabilities to Species and Ecosystems? A Critical Analysis of Ecocentric Versions of the Capabilities Approach J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-08-18 Melin, Anders
Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach is today one of the most influential theories of justice. In her earlier works on the capabilities approach, Nussbaum only applies it to humans, but in later works she extends the capabilities approach to include sentient animals. Contrary to Nussbaum’s own view, some scholars, for example, David Schlosberg, Teea Kortetmäki and Daniel L. Crescenzo, want to extend
-
Laura-Anne Minkoff-Zern: The New American Farmer: Immigration, Race, and the Struggle for Sustainability J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-07-27 Todd LeVasseur
-
The Potential of Bioeconomic Innovations to Contribute to a Social-Ecological Transformation: A Case Study in the Livestock System J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-07-10 Jonathan Friedrich, Ingrid Bunker, Sandra Uthes, Jana Zscheischler
Environmental crises, which are consequences of resource-intensive lifestyles and are characterized to a large extent by both a changing climate and a loss of biodiversity, stress the urgent need for a global social-ecological transformation of the agro-food system. In this regard, the bioeconomy and bioeconomic innovations have frequently been seen as instrumental in addressing these grand challenges
-
Ethics and Human–Animal Relations: Review Essay J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-07-09 Anna Peterson
This review essay considers five recent books that address the ethical dimensions of human–animal relations. The books are David Favre, Respecting Animals: A Balanced Approach to our Relationship with Pets, Food, and Wildlife; T. J. Kasperbauer, Subhuman: The Moral Psychology of Human Attitudes to Animals; Ben Minteer, The Fall of the Wild: Extinction, De-Extinction, and the Ethics of Conservation;
-
Pessimism and Optimism in the Debate on Climate Change: A Critical Analysis J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-07-08 Anders Nordgren
In the debate on climate change commentators often express pessimistic or optimistic views. We see this mainly in the media and popular literature, but also in various academic fields. The aim of this paper is to investigate different kinds of pessimistic and optimistic views put forward in this debate and suggest explanations of the diversity of views. The paper concludes that pessimism and optimism
-
Transitioning Responsibly Toward a Circular Bioeconomy: Using Stakeholder Workshops to Reveal Market Dependencies J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-07-05 Anne-Charlotte Hoes, Simone van der Burg, Greet Overbeek
This article reflects on the contribution that stakeholder involvement could give to circular bioeconomy transformation (CBE). By comparing argument for stakeholder involvement in literature as well as on our own experiences in six stakeholder involvement workshops, we argue that it is probably unrealistic to fully achieve both normative and co-design goals in a single workshop. Furthermore, stakeholder
-
Time to Say ‘Good Buy’ to the Passive Consumer? A Conceptual Review of the Consumer in the Bioeconomy J. Agric. Environ. Ethics (IF 1.8) Pub Date : 2021-06-28 Ulrich Wilke, Michael P. Schlaile, Sophie Urmetzer, Matthias Mueller, Kristina Bogner, Andreas Pyka
Successful transitions to a sustainable bioeconomy require novel technologies, processes, and practices as well as a general agreement about the overarching normative direction of innovation. Both requirements necessarily involve collective action by those individuals who purchase, use, and co-produce novelties: the consumers. Based on theoretical considerations borrowed from evolutionary innovation