The current paradigm of conservation initiatives promotes activities that benefit conservation of wildlife while at the same time improving the welfare of humans living near wildlife habitats. This dual focus of conservation has resulted in an increase in activities that engage local communities. The past decade has seen a shift in how conservation practitioners define the role of conservation education

When the article (Krause & Beran, 2020) was first published online, the book title (Terrace 2019, Nim: A Chimpanzee who learned sign language. New York, NY: Columbia University Press) used in the abstract was incorrect. The correct title for Terrace 2019 is: Why chimpanzees can't learn language and only humans can. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. We apologize for this error.

The future of primates depends on conservationists in primate range countries having the education and opportunities needed to facilitate conservation efforts. However, most primates are found in countries where conservation is underfunded. Rwanda is home to 14 primate species, with three being listed as endangered on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. Their remaining

Pair‐bonded primates have uniquely enduring relationships and partners engage in a suite of behaviors to maintain these close bonds. In titi monkeys, pair bond formation has been extensively studied, but changes across relationship tenure remain unstudied. We evaluated differences in behavioral indicators of pair bonding in newly formed (~6 months paired, n = 9) compared to well‐established pairs (average

The emerging field of network science has demonstrated that an individual's connectedness within their social network has cascading effects to other dimensions of life. Like humans, spider monkeys live in societies with high fission–fusion dynamics, and are remarkably social. Social network analysis (SNA) is a powerful tool for quantifying connections that may vary as a function of initiating or receiving

When the article (Boonratana, 2020) was first published online, the threat nos. 5.3.1 & 5.3.2 were included in the Table. The corresponding two entries (threats nos. 5.3.1 & 5.3.2) should be removed from the Table. The correct Table 1 is mentioned below: Table 1. Causes of fragmentation, influencing variables exacerbating fragmentation, and consequences of fragmentation Threats to biodiversityaa Only