当前位置: X-MOL 学术PLOS ONE › 论文详情
Asymmetrical interference between number and item size perception provides evidence for a domain specific impairment in dyscalculia
PLOS ONE ( IF 2.776 ) Pub Date : 2018-12-14 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209256
Elisa Castaldi, Anne Mirassou, Stanislas Dehaene, Manuela Piazza, Evelyn Eger

Dyscalculia, a specific learning disability that impacts arithmetical skills, has previously been associated to a deficit in the precision of the system that estimates the approximate number of objects in visual scenes (the so called ‘number sense’ system). However, because in tasks involving numerosity comparisons dyscalculics’ judgements appears disproportionally affected by continuous quantitative dimensions (such as the size of the items), an alternative view linked dyscalculia to a domain-general difficulty in inhibiting task-irrelevant responses. To arbitrate between these views, we evaluated the degree of reciprocal interference between numerical and non-numerical quantitative dimensions in adult dyscalculics and matched controls. We used a novel stimulus set orthogonally varying in mean item size and numerosity, putting particular attention into matching both features’ perceptual discriminability. Participants compared those stimuli based on each of the two dimensions. While control subjects showed no significant size interference when judging numerosity, dyscalculics’ numerosity judgments were strongly biased by the unattended size dimension. Importantly however, both groups showed the same degree of interference from the unattended dimension when judging mean size. Moreover, only the ability to discard the irrelevant size information when comparing numerosity (but not the reverse) significantly predicted calculation ability across subjects. Overall, our results show that numerosity discrimination is less prone to interference than discrimination of another quantitative feature (mean item size) when the perceptual discriminability of these features is matched, as here in control subjects. By quantifying, for the first time, dyscalculic subjects’ degree of interference on another orthogonal dimension of the same stimuli, we are able to exclude a domain-general inhibition deficit as explanation for their poor / biased numerical judgement. We suggest that enhanced reliance on non-numerical cues during numerosity discrimination can represent a strategy to cope with a less precise number sense.

更新日期:2018-12-15

 

分享到
评论: 0
期刊列表
2019学者们关注的物理学前沿热点
SpringerNature放射学专题精选,限时免费获取
投稿前一定要看一看
编辑特刊征稿中
精选热门地学图书
第三届全国有机场效应晶体管会议
化学研究精选热文热刊限时下载
外科周专题精选
女性科学家研究精选
论文投稿三步走
研究荟萃限时开放
BMC粉红丝带关怀月
超材料精选
世界精神卫生日
金属-有机框架材料的物理性质
Springer环境科学期刊推荐
环境科学特刊限时开放中
自然合作期刊论文精选
Orcid
高分子化学
北京夏禾科技有限公司
上海纽约大学
中山大学附属第五医院李旸课
招聘实习生
BMC Public Health
课题组网站
Springer Nature
Nature中文内容
X-MOL
广州大学大湾区环境研究院
北京大学分子工程苏南研究院
清华大学程津培院士
南方科技大学机械与能源工程系葛锜
试剂库存
X-MOL文献直达记录功能上线
天合科研
2017年中科院JCR分区化学大类列表
化合物查询
down
wechat
bug