当前位置: X-MOL 学术PLOS ONE › 论文详情
Asymmetrical interference between number and item size perception provides evidence for a domain specific impairment in dyscalculia
PLOS ONE ( IF 2.766 ) Pub Date : 2018-12-14 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209256
Elisa Castaldi, Anne Mirassou, Stanislas Dehaene, Manuela Piazza, Evelyn Eger

Dyscalculia, a specific learning disability that impacts arithmetical skills, has previously been associated to a deficit in the precision of the system that estimates the approximate number of objects in visual scenes (the so called ‘number sense’ system). However, because in tasks involving numerosity comparisons dyscalculics’ judgements appears disproportionally affected by continuous quantitative dimensions (such as the size of the items), an alternative view linked dyscalculia to a domain-general difficulty in inhibiting task-irrelevant responses. To arbitrate between these views, we evaluated the degree of reciprocal interference between numerical and non-numerical quantitative dimensions in adult dyscalculics and matched controls. We used a novel stimulus set orthogonally varying in mean item size and numerosity, putting particular attention into matching both features’ perceptual discriminability. Participants compared those stimuli based on each of the two dimensions. While control subjects showed no significant size interference when judging numerosity, dyscalculics’ numerosity judgments were strongly biased by the unattended size dimension. Importantly however, both groups showed the same degree of interference from the unattended dimension when judging mean size. Moreover, only the ability to discard the irrelevant size information when comparing numerosity (but not the reverse) significantly predicted calculation ability across subjects. Overall, our results show that numerosity discrimination is less prone to interference than discrimination of another quantitative feature (mean item size) when the perceptual discriminability of these features is matched, as here in control subjects. By quantifying, for the first time, dyscalculic subjects’ degree of interference on another orthogonal dimension of the same stimuli, we are able to exclude a domain-general inhibition deficit as explanation for their poor / biased numerical judgement. We suggest that enhanced reliance on non-numerical cues during numerosity discrimination can represent a strategy to cope with a less precise number sense.

更新日期:2018-12-15

 

分享到
评论: 0
期刊列表
投票
nature
Nature
Nature
哈尔滨工业大学刘绍琴教授课题组诚招博士后、科研助理
新加坡国立大学-深圳大学联合招聘STM博士后
南方科技大学化学系黄乃正院士团队招聘
陆军军医大学组织器官再生工程研究中心招聘研究员及科研助理
【问答】请问木质素与环氧氯丙烷是否发生反应,反应产物是什么?
天合科研
2017年中科院JCR分区化学大类列表
试剂库存管理
化合物查询
down
wechat
bug