当前位置: X-MOL 学术PLOS ONE › 论文详情
Asymmetrical interference between number and item size perception provides evidence for a domain specific impairment in dyscalculia
PLOS ONE ( IF 2.766 ) Pub Date : 2018-12-14 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209256
Elisa Castaldi, Anne Mirassou, Stanislas Dehaene, Manuela Piazza, Evelyn Eger

Dyscalculia, a specific learning disability that impacts arithmetical skills, has previously been associated to a deficit in the precision of the system that estimates the approximate number of objects in visual scenes (the so called ‘number sense’ system). However, because in tasks involving numerosity comparisons dyscalculics’ judgements appears disproportionally affected by continuous quantitative dimensions (such as the size of the items), an alternative view linked dyscalculia to a domain-general difficulty in inhibiting task-irrelevant responses. To arbitrate between these views, we evaluated the degree of reciprocal interference between numerical and non-numerical quantitative dimensions in adult dyscalculics and matched controls. We used a novel stimulus set orthogonally varying in mean item size and numerosity, putting particular attention into matching both features’ perceptual discriminability. Participants compared those stimuli based on each of the two dimensions. While control subjects showed no significant size interference when judging numerosity, dyscalculics’ numerosity judgments were strongly biased by the unattended size dimension. Importantly however, both groups showed the same degree of interference from the unattended dimension when judging mean size. Moreover, only the ability to discard the irrelevant size information when comparing numerosity (but not the reverse) significantly predicted calculation ability across subjects. Overall, our results show that numerosity discrimination is less prone to interference than discrimination of another quantitative feature (mean item size) when the perceptual discriminability of these features is matched, as here in control subjects. By quantifying, for the first time, dyscalculic subjects’ degree of interference on another orthogonal dimension of the same stimuli, we are able to exclude a domain-general inhibition deficit as explanation for their poor / biased numerical judgement. We suggest that enhanced reliance on non-numerical cues during numerosity discrimination can represent a strategy to cope with a less precise number sense.

更新日期:2018-12-15

 

分享到
评论: 0
期刊列表
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports编辑流程
科学探索奖
编委Carlo Cannistraci博士专访
X-MOL文献直达记录功能上线
BMC Chemistry
北京大学化学生物学与创新药物研究课题组诚聘有机合成、药理、药代工作人员
中山大学青年千人徐亮教授课题组招聘博士后及特聘副研究员
西安交通大学AJMAL KHAN课题组研究人员招聘启事
北京大学-普林斯顿新药研究中心招聘博士后及研究助理
南科大材料系汪宏讲席教授团队招聘电子材料与器件方向博士后
中山大学化学工程与技术学院诚聘腐蚀与防护相关专业人才
南科大青年千人课题组招聘有机化学方向研究助理教授、博士后、研究助理
天合科研
2017年中科院JCR分区化学大类列表
试剂库存管理
化合物查询
down
wechat
bug