当前位置: X-MOL 学术PLOS ONE › 论文详情
Asymmetrical interference between number and item size perception provides evidence for a domain specific impairment in dyscalculia
PLOS ONE ( IF 2.776 ) Pub Date : 2018-12-14 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209256
Elisa Castaldi, Anne Mirassou, Stanislas Dehaene, Manuela Piazza, Evelyn Eger

Dyscalculia, a specific learning disability that impacts arithmetical skills, has previously been associated to a deficit in the precision of the system that estimates the approximate number of objects in visual scenes (the so called ‘number sense’ system). However, because in tasks involving numerosity comparisons dyscalculics’ judgements appears disproportionally affected by continuous quantitative dimensions (such as the size of the items), an alternative view linked dyscalculia to a domain-general difficulty in inhibiting task-irrelevant responses. To arbitrate between these views, we evaluated the degree of reciprocal interference between numerical and non-numerical quantitative dimensions in adult dyscalculics and matched controls. We used a novel stimulus set orthogonally varying in mean item size and numerosity, putting particular attention into matching both features’ perceptual discriminability. Participants compared those stimuli based on each of the two dimensions. While control subjects showed no significant size interference when judging numerosity, dyscalculics’ numerosity judgments were strongly biased by the unattended size dimension. Importantly however, both groups showed the same degree of interference from the unattended dimension when judging mean size. Moreover, only the ability to discard the irrelevant size information when comparing numerosity (but not the reverse) significantly predicted calculation ability across subjects. Overall, our results show that numerosity discrimination is less prone to interference than discrimination of another quantitative feature (mean item size) when the perceptual discriminability of these features is matched, as here in control subjects. By quantifying, for the first time, dyscalculic subjects’ degree of interference on another orthogonal dimension of the same stimuli, we are able to exclude a domain-general inhibition deficit as explanation for their poor / biased numerical judgement. We suggest that enhanced reliance on non-numerical cues during numerosity discrimination can represent a strategy to cope with a less precise number sense.

更新日期:2018-12-15

 

分享到
评论: 0
期刊列表
BMC Public Health
Altmetric百强作者经验
北大深研院会议广告
课题组网站
Springer Nature
Nature中文内容
北京理工大学机电学院孙伟福
厦门大学药学院宗利利
武汉大学高等研究院陈素明
上海交大医学院分子医学研究院韩达
试剂库存
X-MOL文献直达记录功能上线
天合科研
2017年中科院JCR分区化学大类列表
化合物查询
down
wechat
bug