当前位置: X-MOL 学术Lancet Psychiatry › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Gender inequity, reproductive rights, violence, and social norms.
The Lancet Psychiatry ( IF 64.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-01 , DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30508-5
Gisèle Apter 1 , Gail Erlick Robinson 2 , Nada L Stotland 3
Affiliation  

Was 2019 a landmark in the development of women's rights in science and healthcare? In February 2019, in society and science. Strikingly, the issue illustrates that a dedicated focus on the promotion of gender equity is a possible strategy for change, “because its impact has wide-ranging benefits…for everyone”. This is a strong political statement based on global data. Should gender equity be implemented through concrete, precise, gradual rules according to a predetermined schedule? Is this still necessary, given the progress that has been made during the past decades? Or is gender equity just one of those many subjects that seem to go beyond the possibility of individual action and therefore just trigger vague feelings of guilt that will be driven away with rationalisation, or worse, dismissed?

中文翻译:

性别不平等,生殖权利,暴力和社会规范。

2019年是科学和医疗保健领域女性权利发展的里程碑吗?2019年2月,进入社会与科学领域。令人惊讶的是,这个问题表明,专注于促进性别平等是一种可能的变革策略,“因为它的影响为每个人带来了广泛的利益”。这是基于全球数据的强有力的政治声明。是否应按照预定时间表通过具体,精确,渐进的规则实现性别平等?鉴于过去几十年来所取得的进步,这仍然有必要吗?还是性别平等只是似乎超出个人行动可能性并因此引发模糊的内感的众多主题之一,这些内with感会因合理化而被驱逐,或更糟的是被解雇?
更新日期:2019-12-19
down
wechat
bug