当前位置: X-MOL 学术Clin. Microbiol. Infect. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales after rectal colonization with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Clinical Microbiology and Infection ( IF 14.2 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-03 , DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.025
L A Denkel 1 , F Maechler 1 , F Schwab 1 , A Kola 1 , A Weber 1 , P Gastmeier 1 , F Pfäfflin 2 , S Weber 3 , G Werner 4 , Y Pfeifer 4 , M Pietsch 5 , R Leistner 1
Affiliation  

Objectives

Infections as a result of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) are considered infections with a high public health burden. In this study, we aimed to identify incidences of and risk factors for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) after rectal colonization with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP).

Methods

This prospective cohort study was performed in 2014 and 2015. Patients colonized with ESBL-EC or ESBL-KP were monitored for subsequent HAI with ESBL-E and other pathogens. In the case of an ESBL-E infection, rectal and clinical isolates were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for ESBL-KP isolates. Proportional hazard models were applied to identify risk factors for HAIs, and to analyse competing risks.

Results

Among all patients admitted to the hospital during the study period, 13.6% were rectally screened for third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCREB). A total of 2386 rectal carriers of ESBL-EC and 585 of ESBL-KP were included in the study. Incidence density (ID) for HAI with ESBL-E was 2.74 per 1000 patient days at risk (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.16–3.43) among carriers of ESBL-EC, while it was 4.44 per 1000 patient days at risk (95% CI 3.17–6.04) among carriers of ESBL-KP. In contrast, ID for HAI with other pathogens was 4.36 per 1000 patient days at risk (95% CI 3.62–5.21) among carriers of ESBL-EC, and 5.00 per 1000 patient days at risk (95% CI 3.64–6.69) among carriers of ESBL-KP. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses identified colonization with ESBL-KP (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.068–2.325) compared with ESBL-EC as independent risk factor for HAI with ESBL-E. The results were consistent over all competing risk analyses.

Conclusions

Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of ESBL-E infections among patients colonized with ESBL-KP compared with ESBL-EC that might be caused by underlying diseases, higher pathogenicity of ESBL-KP and other factors.



中文翻译:

产ESBL的大肠杆菌或肺炎克雷伯菌在直肠定殖后,由产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌引起的感染。

目标

由于产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌(ESBL-E)导致的感染被认为具有很高的公共卫生负担。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定在产ESBL的大肠杆菌(ESBL-EC)或肺炎克雷伯菌(ESBL-KP)直肠定植后,医疗相关感染(HAIs)的发生率和危险因素。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究于2014年和2015年进行。对ESBL-EC或ESBL-KP菌落定植的患者进行了ESBL-E和其他病原体随后的HAI监测。对于ESBL-E感染,使用脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)和全基因组测序(WGS)比较ESBL-KP分离株的直肠和临床分离株。应用比例风险模型来识别HAI的风险因素,并分析竞争风险。

结果

在研究期间入院的所有患者中,对13.6%的第三代头孢菌素耐药肠杆菌(3GCREB)进行了直肠筛查。该研究总共包括2386个ESBL-EC直肠载体和585个ESBL-KP直肠载体。在ESBL-EC携带者中,带有ESBL-E的HAI的发生密度(ID)为每千个患者日2.74(95%置信区间(CI)2.16–3.43),而每1000个患者日为4.44(95) ESBL-KP运营商中的百分比CI 3.17–6.04)。相比之下,在ESBL-EC携带者中,HAI和其他病原体的ID风险为每千个患者日4.36(95%CI 3.62–5.21),携带者中每千个患者日5.00(95%CI 3.64–6.69) ESBL-KP。Cox比例风险回归分析确定了ESBL-KP的定植(HR = 1.58,95%CI 1.068–2。325)与ESBL-EC进行比较,将ESBL-E作为HAI的独立危险因素。在所有竞争风险分析中,结果都是一致的。

结论

临床医生应意识到,与ESBL-EC相比,ESBL-KP定植的患者中ESBL-E感染的风险可能是由潜在疾病,ESBL-KP的较高致病性和其他因素引起的。

更新日期:2019-12-03
down
wechat
bug