当前位置: X-MOL 学术Cardiovasc. Diabetol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Effects of exenatide and open-label SGLT2 inhibitor treatment, given in parallel or sequentially, on mortality and cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: insights from the EXSCEL trial.
Cardiovascular Diabetology ( IF 9.3 ) Pub Date : 2019-10-22 , DOI: 10.1186/s12933-019-0942-x
Lindsay E Clegg 1 , Robert C Penland 2 , Srinivas Bachina 2 , David W Boulton 1 , Marcus Thuresson 3 , Hiddo J L Heerspink 4 , Stephanie Gustavson 5 , C David Sjöström 6 , James A Ruggles 7 , Adrian F Hernandez 8 , John B Buse 9 , Robert J Mentz 8 , Rury R Holman 10
Affiliation  

BACKGROUND Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes through distinct mechanisms. However, evidence on clinical outcomes in patients treated with both GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i is lacking. We aim to provide insight into the effects of open-label SGLT2i use in parallel with or shortly after once-weekly GLP-1 RA exenatide (EQW) on cardiorenal outcomes. METHODS In the EXSCEL cardiovascular outcomes trial EQW arm, SGLT2i drop-in occurred in 8.7% of participants. These EQW+SGLT2i users were propensity-matched to: (1) placebo-arm participants not taking SGLT2i (n = 572 per group); and to (2) EQW-arm participants not taking SGLT2i (n = 575), based on their last measured characteristics before SGLT2i initiation, and equivalent study visit in comparator groups. Time-to-first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and all-cause mortality (ACM) were compared using Cox regression analyses. eGFR slopes were quantified using mixed model repeated measurement analyses. RESULTS In adjusted analyses, the risk for MACE with combination EQW+SGLT2i use was numerically lower compared with both placebo (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.39-1.17) and EQW alone (0.85, 0.48-1.49). Risk of ACM was nominally significantly reduced compared with placebo (0.38, 0.16-0.90) and compared with EQW (0.41, 0.17-0.95). Combination EQW+SGLT2i use also nominally significantly improved estimated eGFR slope compared with placebo (+ 1.94, 95% CI 0.94-2.94 mL/min/1.73 m2/year) and EQW alone (+ 2.38, 1.40-3.35 mL/min/1.73 m2/year). CONCLUSIONS This post hoc analysis supports the hypothesis that combinatorial EQW and SGLT2i therapy may provide benefit on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifying number: NCT01144338, Date of registration: June 15, 2010.

中文翻译:

艾塞那肽和开放标签的SGLT2抑制剂治疗(平行或相继给予)对2型糖尿病的死亡率以及心血管和肾脏结局的影响:来自EXSCEL试验的见解。

背景技术钠葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)通过不同的机制改善2型糖尿病患者的心血管和肾脏预后。但是,缺乏有关同时接受GLP-1 RA和SGLT2i治疗的患者的临床结局的证据。我们旨在提供与每周一次或每周一次的GLP-1 RA艾塞那肽(EQW)并行使用或不久后使用开放标签SGLT2i对心肾预后的影响的见解。方法在EXSCEL心血管预后试验EQW组中,8.7%的参与者发生了SGLT2i下降。这些EQW + SGLT2i用户倾向匹配:(1)不服用SGLT2i的安慰剂组参与者(每组n = 572);(2)根据他们在SGLT2i启动之前的最新测量特征,不参加SGLT2i的EQW臂参与者(n = 575),并在比较组中进行等效的研究访问。使用Cox回归分析比较了首次出现重大不良心血管事件(MACE)的时间和全因死亡率(ACM)。使用混合模型重复测量分析对eGFR斜率进行定量。结果在调整后的分析中,与单独使用安慰剂(调整后的危险比0.68,95%CI 0.39-1.17)和单独使用EQW相比,使用EQW + SGLT2i组合进行MACE的风险在数值上较低(0.85,0.48-1.49)。与安慰剂(0.38,0.16-0.90)和EQW(0.41,0.17-0.95)相比,ACM的风险名义上显着降低。与安慰剂组(+ 1.94,95%CI 0.94-2.94 mL / min / 1.73 m2 /年)和单独的EQW(+ 2.38,1.40-3.35 mL / min / 1.73 m2)相比,EQW + SGLT2i的组合使用也名义上显着改善了估计eGFR斜率/年)。结论这项事后分析支持以下假设,即联合EQW和SGLT2i治疗可能对心血管结局和死亡率产生益处。试用注册Clinicaltrials.gov,标识号:NCT01144338,注册日期:2010年6月15日。
更新日期:2019-10-22
down
wechat
bug