当前位置: X-MOL 学术BMC Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Guideline use among different healthcare professionals in diagnosing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Dutch children; who cares?
BMC Psychology ( IF 2.588 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-03 , DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0304-1
Birgit Levelink , Lonneke Walraven , Edward Dompeling , Frans J. M. Feron , Dorothea M. C. B. van Zeben-van der Aa

Current data about Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Deficiency (ADHD) guideline use in the Netherlands are absent. This study analysed ADHD guideline use among different healthcare workers, and the use of key elements from these guidelines to diagnose ADHD. A survey assessing ADHD guideline use was distributed throughout the Netherlands to various health care professionals. Only professionals involved during the diagnostic process were included. Response rate among GPs was low (111/1450), but high among other health care professionals (251/287). A total of 362 surveys were analysed, 186 responders (51%) were involved during the diagnostic process. Overall guideline use was 64.5%; the national multidisciplinary guideline or a guideline made by a professional’s own institution were most used. Psychiatrists, psychologists and paediatricians reported compliance with key elements of the guidelines such as gathering information from a third party (> 90%) and carrying out a developmental history (> 88%). Use of a standardized interview (< 52% often use) was low. Only paediatricians performed a physical examination regularly (88%). Despite low general use of guidelines, psychiatrists, psychologists and paediatricians use similar key elements of ADHD guidelines. This study provides opportunities to improve care through increasing familiarity with ADHD guidelines and the use of standardized interviews.

中文翻译:

不同医疗保健专业人员在诊断荷兰儿童注意缺陷多动障碍中的指南使用;谁在乎?

目前缺少有关荷兰注意力不足过动症(ADHD)指南使用的最新数据。这项研究分析了不同医护人员对ADHD指南的使用,以及这些指南中关键要素在诊断ADHD中的使用。一项评估多动症指南使用情况的调查已在荷兰各地分发给各种医疗保健专业人员。仅包括诊断过程中涉及的专业人员。全科医生的回应率很低(111/1450),但其他卫生保健专业人员的回应率很高(251/287)。在诊断过程中,总共分析了362个调查,涉及186个响应者(51%)。总体指南使用率为64.5%;最常使用的是国家多学科指南或专业机构制定的指南。精神科医生,心理学家和儿科医生报告说,他们遵守了指南的关键要素,例如从第三方收集信息(> 90%)和开展发展史(> 88%)。标准化访谈的使用率较低(经常使用<52%)。只有儿科医生定期进行身体检查(88%)。尽管指南使用率不高,但精神科医生,心理学家和儿科医生仍使用ADHD指南的相似关键要素。通过增加对注意力缺陷多动障碍指南的了解和标准化访谈的使用,本研究提供了改善护理的机会。只有儿科医生定期进行身体检查(88%)。尽管指南使用率不高,但精神科医生,心理学家和儿科医生仍使用ADHD指南的相似关键要素。通过增加对注意力缺陷多动障碍指南的了解和标准化访谈的使用,本研究提供了改善护理的机会。只有儿科医生定期进行身体检查(88%)。尽管指南使用率不高,但精神科医生,心理学家和儿科医生仍使用ADHD指南的相似关键要素。通过增加对注意力缺陷多动障碍指南的了解和标准化访谈的使用,本研究提供了改善护理的机会。
更新日期:2019-07-03
down
wechat
bug