Abstract This paper focuses on the source of self-repairs of segmental speech errors during self-monitoring. A potential source of repairs are candidate forms competing with the form under production. In the time interval between self-monitoring internal and overt speech, activation of competitors probably decreases. From this theory of repairing we derived four main predictions specific for classical SLIP experiments: (1) Error-to-cutoff times are shorter after single elicited errors than after other errors. (2) Single elicited errors are relatively more often detected than other errors, but more so after internal than after external error detection. (3) The correct form is the most frequent form used as repair, but more so for single elicited than for other errors. (4) Cutoff-to-repair times are shorter for single elicited than for other errors. A re-analysis of data formerly obtained in two SLIP experiments mainly supports the theory of repairing for multiple but not for single non-elicited errors.

中文翻译：

---

修复言语错误：竞争是修复的源泉

摘要 本文重点研究自我监控过程中语音分段错误自我修复的来源。潜在的维修来源是与正在生产的表格竞争的候选表格。在自我监控内部和公开言论之间的时间间隔内，竞争对手的活跃度可能会降低。从这个修复理论中，我们得出了针对经典 SLIP 实验的四个主要预测：（1）单个引发错误后的错误到截止时间比其他错误后更短。(2) 单个引发的错误比其他错误更常被检测到，但在内部错误检测之后比在外部错误检测之后更经常被检测到。(3) 正确的形式是最常用于修复的形式，但对于单个引发的错误比其他错误更是如此。(4) 单个错误的截止到修复时间比其他错误短。