当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients with spinal infection: a systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging ( IF 9.1 ) Pub Date : 2019-11-15 , DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04571-6
Giorgio Treglia , Mariarosa Pascale , Elena Lazzeri , Wouter van der Bruggen , Roberto C. Delgado Bolton , Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans

Purpose

Diagnosis of spinal infection (SI) is challenging and usually requires multiple tests. We aimed to perform a systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis on the diagnostic role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with SI.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of studies published through February 2019 in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases was carried out. Studies investigating the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with SI were eligible for inclusion in the qualitative analysis. For the quantitative analysis, pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR−) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected SI were calculated on a per examination-based analysis. Pooled data were presented with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

Twenty-six articles (833 patients) using 18F-FDG PET/CT were eligible for the qualitative analysis. Twelve studies (396 patients) were selected for the meta-analysis. Overall, 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a very good diagnostic performance in patients with SI and several studies underlined the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the response to treatment. The bivariate meta-analysis on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected SI provided the following results: sensitivity 94.8% (95% CI 88.9–97.6%) and specificity 91.4% (95% CI 78.2–96.9%). The pooled LR+, LR− and DOR were 4.7 (95% CI 2.9–7.7), 0.11 (95% CI 0.07–0.16) and 63.4 (95% CI 28.9–139), respectively. No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was found.

Conclusion

18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a very good diagnostic performance in patients with SI and can be used in patients in which MRI cannot be performed or is non-diagnostic or inconclusive. Several studies underlined the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the response to treatment in patients with SI. Overall, larger multicentre and prospective studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.



中文翻译:

18 F-FDG PET / CT在脊柱感染患者中的诊断性能:系统评价和双变量荟萃分析

目的

脊柱感染(SI)的诊断具有挑战性,通常需要进行多次测试。我们旨在对18 F-FDG PET / CT在SI患者中的诊断作用进行系统的回顾和双因素荟萃分析。

方法

对截至2019年2月在PubMed / MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库中发表的研究进行了全面的文献检索。研究18 F-FDG PET / CT对SI患者诊断性能的研究符合定性分析的条件。为了进行定量分析,基于每次检查的分析计算了疑似SI患者中18 F-FDG PET / CT的合并敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性似然比(LR +和LR-)和诊断比值比(DOR)。。汇总数据以95%的置信区间(95%CI)呈现。

结果

使用18个F-FDG PET / CT的26篇文章(833例)符合定性分析的条件。选择十二项研究(396名患者)进行荟萃分析。总体而言,18 F-FDG PET / CT对SI患者表现出非常好的诊断性能,多项研究强调18 F-FDG PET / CT在评估治疗反应方面的价值。对疑似SI的患者进行的18 F-FDG PET / CT的双变量荟萃分析提供了以下结果:敏感性94.8%(95%CI 88.9–97.6%)和特异性91.4%(95%CI 78.2–96.9%)。合并的LR +,LR-和DOR分别为4.7(95%CI 2.9-7.7),0.11(95%CI 0.07-0.16)和63.4(95%CI 28.9-139)。没有发现明显的异质性或出版偏见。

结论

18 F-FDG PET / CT对SI患者表现出非常好的诊断性能,可用于无法进行MRI或无法诊断或不确定的MRI患者。几项研究强调了18 F-FDG PET / CT在评估SI患者对治疗的反应中的价值。总体而言,有必要进行更大范围的多中心和前瞻性研究以及成本效益分析。

更新日期:2020-04-22
down
wechat
bug