The implementation of the national ‘Getting It Right First Time’ was assessed by interviewing six surgeons involved at various levels in surgical site infection (SSI) audit. The positive impacts were to create new professional collaboration, improve stakeholder engagement, and increase the profile of SSIs. One particular knowledge gap highlighted was that some participants had been unaware until that point of the criteria for diagnosing an SSI. The quality of data collected was felt to be poor due to methodological flaws. The audit was described as highly time-consuming and unsustainable if leaning on junior surgeons, without protected time and designated responsibility.

通过采访参与手术部位感染（SSI）审核的不同级别的六名外科医生，评估了国家“第一时间正确实施”的实施情况。积极的影响是建立了新的专业合作关系，提高了利益相关者的参与度，并提高了SSI的知名度。突出的一个特殊知识鸿沟是，一些参与者直到那时才意识到诊断SSI的标准。由于方法上的缺陷，人们认为收集的数据质量很差。如果依靠初级医生，没有保护的时间和指定的责任，则审计被认为是非常耗时且不可持续的。