当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Environmental Science Processes & Impacts
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of DET, DGT and conventional porewater extractions for determining nutrient profiles and cycling in stream sediments
Environmental Science Processes & Impacts Pub Date : 2019-10-29 , DOI: 10.1039/c9em00312f Jianyin Huang 1 , Hannah Franklin , Peter R Teasdale , Michele A Burford , Nadeeka Rathnayake Kankanamge , William W Bennett , David T Welsh
中文翻译:
DET、DGT 和传统孔隙水提取法在确定河流沉积物中的营养成分和循环方面的比较
更新日期:2019-10-29
Environmental Science Processes & Impacts Pub Date : 2019-10-29 , DOI: 10.1039/c9em00312f Jianyin Huang 1 , Hannah Franklin , Peter R Teasdale , Michele A Burford , Nadeeka Rathnayake Kankanamge , William W Bennett , David T Welsh
Affiliation
Passive samplers measurements, especially DET, contributed to understanding of nitrogen transformations and sediment heterogeneity influenced by benthic microalgae, rooted aquatic plants and/or diel light cycles. Measurement capabilities varied considerably, especially for NH4–N.
中文翻译:
DET、DGT 和传统孔隙水提取法在确定河流沉积物中的营养成分和循环方面的比较
被动采样器测量,尤其是 DET,有助于了解受底栖微藻、生根水生植物和/或昼夜光循环影响的氮转化和沉积物异质性。测量能力差异很大,特别是对于 NH 4 –N。