当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Development and assessment of the inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility of a self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R.
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry ( IF 11.0 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-26 , DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321138
Leonhard A Bakker 1, 2 , Carin D Schröder 2, 3 , Harold H G Tan 1 , Simone M A G Vugts 1 , Ruben P A van Eijk 1, 4 , Michael A van Es 1 , Johanna M A Visser-Meily 2, 3 , Leonard H van den Berg 5
Affiliation  

OBJECTIVE The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) is widely applied to assess disease severity and progression in patients with motor neuron disease (MND). The objective of the study is to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility, i.e., the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and agreement, of a self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R for use in apps, online platforms, clinical care and trials. METHODS The self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R was developed based on both patient and expert feedback. To assess the inter-rater reproducibility, 59 patients with MND filled out the ALSFRS-R online and were subsequently assessed on the ALSFRS-R by three raters. To assess the intra-rater reproducibility, patients were invited on two occasions to complete the ALSFRS-R online. Reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients, agreement was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and paired samples t-tests, and internal consistency was examined with Cronbach's coefficient alpha. RESULTS The self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R demonstrated excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. The assessment of inter-rater agreement demonstrated small systematic differences between patients and raters and acceptable limits of agreement. The assessment of intra-rater agreement demonstrated no systematic changes between time points; limits of agreement were 4.3 points for the total score and ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 points for the domain scores. Coefficient alpha values were acceptable. DISCUSSION The self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R demonstrates high reproducibility and can be used in apps and online portals for both individual comparisons, facilitating the management of clinical care and group comparisons in clinical trials.

中文翻译:

开发和评估ALSFRS-R自我管理版本的评估者之间和评估者内部的可重复性。

目的修订肌萎缩性侧索硬化功能评分量表(ALSFRS-R),以评估运动神经元疾病(MND)患者的疾病严重程度和病情进展。这项研究的目的是评估ALSFRS-R自管理版本在应用程序,在线平台中使用的评估者之间和评估者内部的可重复性,即评估者之间和评估者内部的可靠性和一致性。 ,临床护理和试验。方法ALSFRS-R的自我管理版本是根据患者和专家的反馈而开发的。为了评估评估者之间的可重复性,共有59名MND患者在线填写了ALSFRS-R,随后由三名评估者对ALSFRS-R进行了评估。为了评估评估者内的可重复性,两次邀请患者在线完成ALSFRS-R。使用组内相关系数评估可靠性,使用Bland-Altman图和配对样本t检验评估一致性,并使用Cronbach系数α检验内部一致性。结果ALSFRS-R的自我管理版本显示出出色的评估者间和评估者内可靠性。评估者之间协议的评估表明,患者与评估者之间的系统性细微差异以及协议的可接受范围。评估者内部协议的评估表明,各时间点之间没有系统的变化;协议限制的总分数为4.3分,领域分数的分数范围为1.6至2.4分。系数α值是可以接受的。
更新日期:2019-12-18
down
wechat
bug