当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Impact of apical foreshortening on deformation measurements: a report from the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force.
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging ( IF 6.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-01 , DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez189
Serkan Ünlü 1 , Jürgen Duchenne 1 , Oana Mirea 1 , Efstathios D Pagourelias 1 , Stéphanie Bézy 1 , Marta Cvijic 1 , Ahmed Salem Beela 1 , James D Thomas 2 , Luigi P Badano 3 , Jens-Uwe Voigt 1 ,
Affiliation  

AIMS Foreshortening of apical views is a common problem in echocardiography. It results in an abnormally thick false apex and a shortened left ventricular (LV) long axis. We sought to evaluate the impact of foreshortened (FS) on LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and layer-specific 2D speckle tracking based segmental (S) and global (G) longitudinal strain (LS) measurements. METHODS AND RESULTS We examined 72 participants using a GE Vivid E9 system. FS apical views were collected from an imaging window one rib-space higher than the optimal images. Ejection fraction as well as layer-specific GLS and SLS measurements were analysed by GE EchoPAC v201 and TomTec Image Arena 4.6 and compared between optimal and FS images. On average, LV long axis was 10% shorter in FS images than in optimal images. FS induced a relative change in LVEF of 3.3% and 6.9% for GE and TomTec, respectively (both, P < 0.001). Endocardial GLS was 9.0% higher with GE and 23.2% with TomTec (P < 0.001). Midwall GLS measurements were less affected (7.8% for GE and 14.1% for TomTec, respectively, both P < 0.001). Segmental strain analysis revealed that the mid-ventricular and apical segments were more affected by foreshortening, and endocardial measurements were more affected than midwall. CONCLUSION Optimal image geometry is crucial for accurate LV function assessment. Foreshorhening of apical views has a substantial impact on longitudinal strain measurements, predominantly in the apex and in the endocardial layer. Our data suggest that measuring midwall strain might therefore be the more robust approach for clinical routine use.

中文翻译:

根尖缩短对变形测量的影响:EACVI-ASE应变标准化工作组的一份报告。

目的缩短心尖视图是超声心动图检查中的常见问题。这会导致假尖异常粗大,并缩短左心室(LV)长轴。我们试图评估缩短(FS)对LV射血分数(LVEF)和基于层特定2D斑点跟踪的分段(S)和整体(G)纵向应变(LS)测量的影响。方法和结果我们使用GE Vivid E9系统检查了72名参与者。从比最佳图像高一倍的肋骨空间的成像窗口中收集FS顶视图。通过GE EchoPAC v201和TomTec Image Arena 4.6分析了射血分数以及特定于图层的GLS和SLS测量结果,并在最佳图像和FS图像之间进行了比较。平均而言,FS图像中的LV长轴比最佳图像中短10%。FS引起LVEF的相对变化为3.3%和6。GE和TomTec分别为9%(均P <0.001)。GE的心内膜GLS升高9.0%,TomTec的心内膜GLS升高23.2%(P <0.001)。中壁GLS测量的影响较小(GE分别为7.8%和TomTec为14.1%,两者均P <0.001)。节段性应变分析显示,节律对心室和心尖段的影响更大,而心内膜测量对心室壁的影响更大。结论最佳图像几何形状对于准确的LV功能评估至关重要。顶视图的预视对纵向应变的测量有很大影响,主要在心尖和心内膜层。我们的数据表明,测量中壁应变可能因此是临床常规使用的更可靠的方法。GE和TomTec分别提高0%和23.2%(P <0.001)。中壁GLS测量的影响较小(GE分别为7.8%和TomTec为14.1%,两者均P <0.001)。节段性应变分析显示,节律对心室和心尖段的影响更大,而心内膜测量对心室壁的影响更大。结论最佳图像几何形状对于准确的LV功能评估至关重要。顶视图的预视对纵向应变的测量有很大影响,主要在心尖和心内膜层。我们的数据表明,测量中壁应变可能因此是临床常规使用的更可靠的方法。GE和TomTec分别提高0%和23.2%(P <0.001)。中壁GLS测量的影响较小(GE分别为7.8%和TomTec为14.1%,两者均P <0.001)。节段性应变分析显示,脑室和根尖节段受节距的影响更大,心内膜测量值比中壁节段受到的影响更大。结论最佳图像几何形状对于准确的LV功能评估至关重要。顶视图的预视对纵向应变的测量有很大影响,主要在心尖和心内膜层。我们的数据表明,测量中壁应变可能因此是临床常规使用的更可靠的方法。节段性应变分析显示,脑室和根尖节段受节距的影响更大,心内膜测量值比中壁节段受到的影响更大。结论最佳图像几何形状对于准确的LV功能评估至关重要。顶视图的预视对纵向应变的测量有很大影响,主要在心尖和心内膜层。我们的数据表明,测量中壁应变可能因此是临床常规使用的更可靠的方法。节段性应变分析显示,节律对心室和心尖段的影响更大,而心内膜测量对心室壁的影响更大。结论最佳图像几何形状对于准确的LV功能评估至关重要。顶视图的预视对纵向应变的测量有很大的影响,主要在心尖和心内膜层。我们的数据表明,测量中壁应变可能因此是临床常规使用的更可靠的方法。顶视图的预视对纵向应变的测量有很大影响,主要在心尖和心内膜层。我们的数据表明,测量中壁应变可能因此是临床常规使用的更可靠的方法。顶视图的预视对纵向应变的测量有很大影响,主要在心尖和心内膜层。我们的数据表明,测量中壁应变可能因此是临床常规使用的更可靠的方法。
更新日期:2020-03-19
down
wechat
bug