During the methods crisis in psychology and other sciences, much discussion developed online in forums such as blogs and other social media. Hence, this increasingly popular channel of scientific discussion itself needs to be explored to inform current controversies, record the historical moment, improve methods communication, and address equity issues. Who posts what about whom, and with what effect? Does a particular generation or gender contribute more than another? Do blogs focus narrowly on methods, or do they cover a range of issues? How do they discuss individual researchers, and how do readers respond? What are some impacts? Web-scraping and text-analysis techniques provide a snapshot characterizing 41 current research-methods blogs in psychology. Bloggers mostly represented psychology's traditional leaderships' demographic categories: primarily male, mid- to late career, associated with American institutions, White, and with established citation counts. As methods blogs, their posts mainly concern statistics, replication (particularly statistical power), and research findings. The few posts that mentioned individual researchers substantially focused on replication issues; they received more views, social-media impact, comments, and citations. Male individual researchers were mentioned much more often than female researchers. Further data can inform perspectives about these new channels of scientific communication, with the shared aim of improving scientific practices.

中文翻译：

---

在心理学中探索研究方法博客：谁发表关于谁的文章，并产生什么影响？

在心理学和其他科学领域的方法危机期间，在诸如博客和其他社交媒体之类的论坛上在线展开了很多讨论。因此，需要探索这种日益流行的科学讨论渠道，以告知当前的争议，记录历史时刻，改善方法的交流以及解决公平问题。谁发表关于谁的文章，产生什么影响？某一代人或某性别是否比另一方贡献更多？博客是否只关注方法，还是涵盖了一系列问题？他们如何讨论个人研究人员，以及读者如何回应？有什么影响？Web抓取和文本分析技术提供了快照，描述了41个当前心理学方面的研究方法博客。博客主要代表心理学的传统领导者 人口统计类别：主要是男性，职业中期至后期，与美国机构，怀特（White）和已建立的引用计数相关。作为方法博客，其帖子主要涉及统计，复制（尤其是统计能力）和研究结果。很少有提到个别研究人员的帖子主要关注复制问题。他们获得了更多的观点，社交媒体的影响，评论和引用。男性个人研究人员被提及的次数要多于女性研究人员。进一步的数据可以为有关科学传播这些新渠道的观点提供信息，其共同目标是改善科学实践。复制（尤其是统计能力）和研究结果。很少有提到个别研究人员的帖子主要关注复制问题。他们获得了更多的观点，社交媒体的影响，评论和引用。男性个人研究人员被提及的频率要高于女性研究人员。进一步的数据可以为有关科学传播这些新渠道的观点提供信息，其共同目标是改善科学实践。复制（尤其是统计能力）和研究结果。很少有提到个别研究人员的帖子主要关注复制问题。他们获得了更多的观点，社交媒体的影响，评论和引用。男性个人研究人员被提及的次数要多于女性研究人员。进一步的数据可以为有关科学传播这些新渠道的观点提供信息，其共同目标是改善科学实践。