当前位置: X-MOL 学术npj Sci. Learn. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Can cognitive processes help explain the success of instructional techniques recommended by behavior analysts?
npj Science of Learning ( IF 4.2 ) Pub Date : 2018-01-17 , DOI: 10.1038/s41539-017-0018-1
Rebecca A Markovits 1 , Yana Weinstein 1
Affiliation  

The fields of cognitive psychology and behavior analysis have undertaken separate investigations into effective learning strategies. These studies have led to several recommendations from both fields regarding teaching techniques that have been shown to enhance student performance. While cognitive psychology and behavior analysis have studied student performance independently from their different perspectives, the recommendations they make are remarkably similar. The lack of discussion between the two fields, despite these similarities, is surprising. The current paper seeks to remedy this oversight in two ways: first, by reviewing two techniques recommended by behavior analysts—guided notes and response cards—and comparing them to their counterparts in cognitive psychology that are potentially responsible for their effectiveness; and second, by outlining some other areas of overlap that could benefit from collaboration. By starting the discussion with the comparison of two specific recommendations for teaching techniques, we hope to galvanize a more extensive collaboration that will not only further the progression of both fields, but also extend the practical applications of the ensuing research.



中文翻译:

认知过程可以帮助解释行为分析师推荐的教学技术的成功吗?

认知心理学和行为分析领域对有效的学习策略进行了单独的研究。这些研究导致两个领域提出了一些关于教学技术的建议,这些建议已被证明可以提高学生的表现。虽然认知心理学和行为分析从不同的角度独立研究学生的表现,但他们提出的建议却非常相似。尽管这两个领域有这些相似之处,但缺乏讨论还是令人惊讶的。当前的论文试图通过两种方式弥补这种疏忽:首先,回顾行为分析师推荐的两种技术——引导笔记和反应卡——并将它们与认知心理学中可能对其有效性负责的同行进行比较;其次,概述了一些可以从合作中受益的其他重叠领域。通过对教学技术的两个具体建议进行比较来开始讨论,我们希望激发更广泛的合作,这不仅会进一步推动这两个领域的发展,而且会扩展后续研究的实际应用。

更新日期:2018-01-17
down
wechat
bug