当前位置: X-MOL 学术Biol. Conserv. › 论文详情
Local perceptions of trophy hunting on communal lands in Namibia
Biological Conservation ( IF 4.451 ) Pub Date : 2017-12-08 , DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.033
Hilma N. Angula, Greg Stuart-Hill, David Ward, Greenwell Matongo, Richard W. Diggle, Robin Naidoo

Trophy hunting in Africa is currently under pressure as some countries explore various policies that aim to put a halt to an activity that many people in the Western developed world view as unpalatable or unethical. However, in the debate over trophy hunting policy the voices of local communities, who in many instances allow wildlife to persist on the lands they control because of the tangible benefits they derive from it, have been largely unheard. Here, we report on an opportunistic survey of 160 rural residents of Namibia from 32 communal conservancies that generate varying levels of livelihood benefits from wildlife uses, including trophy hunting. About three quarters of these community members were employed in some manner by the conservancy. We used a mixed methods approach to assess community members' perceptions on trophy hunting, the benefits it generates, whether it was “good” or “bad”, and how they would respond if trophy hunting were halted. 91% stated they were not in favour of a ban on trophy hunting, and only 11% of respondents would support wildlife on communal lands if a ban were in fact enacted. Most respondents (90%) were happy with trophy hunting occurring on communal lands due to the benefits it provides. These responses were consistent across respondent demographic categories, although those who stand to lose the most (i.e., those employed by or managing a conservancy), viewed trophy hunting in an even more favourable light. Our results suggest that in Namibia, a trophy hunting ban would be viewed very poorly by conservancy residents, and would seriously weaken their support for wildlife conservation. The imposition of trophy hunting policies by countries far from where rural land managers are conserving wildlife would not only restrict communities' livelihood options, but may have perverse, negative impacts on wildlife conservation.

更新日期:2017-12-14

 

分享到
评论: 0
期刊列表
外科周专题精选
化学研究精选热文热刊限时下载
研究荟萃限时开放
Springer地学期刊推荐
BMC粉红丝带关怀月
超材料精选
世界精神卫生日
金属-有机框架材料的物理性质
Springer环境科学期刊推荐
参会差旅补助金
环境科学特刊限时开放中
自然合作期刊论文精选
美国化学会上海第四届研究生学术大赛
Nature太阳能会议
Orcid
高分子化学
南方科技大学张绪穆
湖南大学李梓维
天津大学—新加坡国立大学
招聘实习生
BMC Public Health
课题组网站
Springer Nature
Nature中文内容
X-MOL
华中师范大学化学学院
上海科技大学左智伟
Prof. David Leigh华东师范大学
北京大学分子工程苏南研究院
试剂库存
X-MOL文献直达记录功能上线
天合科研
2017年中科院JCR分区化学大类列表
化合物查询
down
wechat
bug