Professionals employed within the field of domestic and sexual violence (DV/SV) are known to experience both positive and negative psychological impacts because of the nature of their work. This review aims to establish which factors influence the professional quality of life (ProQOL) of DV/SV advocates. This group is known to face challenges that are specific to their working practices including scarce resources and frequent exposure to traumatic material. The systematic review protocol was designed based upon Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidance. Following a mixed-methods convergent segregated approach, a systematic search for qualitative and quantitative research within PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Sage, Taylor & Francis, Wiley Online Library, and BASE was undertaken. Peer-reviewed empirical research and relevant gray literature, published in English, were considered for inclusion. Thirty articles were identified (16 quantitative, 13 qualitative, and 1 mixed-methods study), and assessed for methodological quality and risk of bias using established quality appraisal tools. An array of risk and protective factors emerged including communication competence, support from co-workers, office resources, and occupational stigma. A gap in the current evidence base was identified regarding the role that personal strengths may play in the well-being of those employed within the DV/SV sector. The ProQOL of DV/SV advocates is complex and dependent upon a variety of factors specific to their situation at the time. However, the findings of this review provide an important evidence base for future research avenues as well as policies and procedures for this workforce specifically.

中文翻译：

---

家庭暴力和性暴力倡导者的职业生活质量：对可能的风险和保护因素的系统审查。

众所周知，在家庭暴力和性暴力 (DV/SV) 领域工作的专业人员因其工作性质而受到积极和消极的心理影响。本综述旨在确定哪些因素会影响 DV/SV 倡导者的职业生活质量 (ProQOL)。众所周知，这个群体面临着工作实践特有的挑战，包括资源稀缺和经常接触创伤性材料。系统审查协议是根据系统审查和元分析 (PRISMA) 2020 指南的首选报告项目设计的。遵循混合方法收敛隔离方法，在 PsycINFO、Academic Search Complete、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Sage、Taylor & Francis、Wiley Online Library 中进行定性和定量研究的系统搜索，并进行了BASE。考虑纳入以英文发表的经过同行评审的实证研究和相关灰色文献。确定了 30 篇文章（16 篇定量研究、13 篇定性研究和 1 篇混合方法研究），并使用已建立的质量评估工具评估了方法学质量和偏倚风险。出现了一系列风险和保护因素，包括沟通能力、同事的支持、办公室资源和职业耻辱感。关于个人优势对 DV/SV 部门雇员的福祉可能发挥的作用，目前的证据基础存在差距。DV/SV 拥护者的 ProQOL 很复杂，取决于他们当时具体情况的多种因素。然而，