How do object-scene relationships contribute to the recognition of objects and scenes? Findings related to this question are mixed, and the mediating factors remain unclear. The current study focused on the scene consistency effect and investigated the role of recognizability in modulating this effect. In Experiment 1 and 2, we presented foreground objects and background scenes in semantic consistent or inconsistent combinations; we also manipulated the recognizability of naming targets via using degraded and undegraded pictures. Participants were required to report the names of foreground objects (Exp. 1) or background scenes (Exp. 2) after viewing pictures for 80ms. The analysis of recognition accuracy revealed contextual consistency effects on both object and scene perception, and such effects were shown to vary as a function of recognizability, with a larger influence on less recognizable objects and scenes. In addition, the mediating effects of recognizability were larger for object recognition than for scene recognition. In Experiment 3, we examined object and scene naming alone without contextual information. The comparison with the other experiments showed that both object and scene recognition were interfered with by contextual inconsistency. Taken toghether, the findings suggest that objects and scenes are processed interactively and that such interaction is mediated by recognizability. In addition, the mediating role of recognizability varies for object and scene recognition, implying the distinct processing mechanisms underlying them.

物体-场景关系如何有助于物体和场景的识别？与这个问题相关的研究结果好坏参半，中介因素仍不清楚。当前的研究侧重于场景一致性效应，并研究了可识别性在调节这种效应中的作用。在实验 1 和 2 中，我们以语义一致或不一致的组合呈现前景对象和背景场景；我们还通过使用退化和未退化的图片来操纵命名目标的可识别性。要求参与者在观看图片 80 毫秒后报告前景物体（实验 1）或背景场景（实验 2）的名称。识别准确性的分析揭示了上下文一致性对物体和场景感知的影响，并且这种影响显示出作为可识别性的函数而变化，对不易识别的物体和场景影响较大。此外，可识别性的中介效应对物体识别的影响大于对场景识别的影响。在实验 3 中，我们在没有上下文信息的情况下单独检查了对象和场景命名。与其他实验的比较表明，对象和场景识别都受到上下文不一致的干扰。总而言之，研究结果表明，对象和场景是交互处理的，并且这种交互是由可识别性调节的。此外，可识别性的中介作用因对象和场景识别而异，暗示它们背后的不同处理机制。可识别性的中介效应对物体识别的影响大于对场景识别的影响。在实验 3 中，我们在没有上下文信息的情况下单独检查了对象和场景命名。与其他实验的比较表明，对象和场景识别都受到上下文不一致的干扰。总而言之，研究结果表明，对象和场景是交互处理的，并且这种交互是由可识别性调节的。此外，可识别性的中介作用因对象和场景识别而异，暗示它们背后的不同处理机制。可识别性的中介效应对物体识别的影响大于对场景识别的影响。在实验 3 中，我们在没有上下文信息的情况下单独检查了对象和场景命名。与其他实验的比较表明，对象和场景识别都受到上下文不一致的干扰。总而言之，研究结果表明，对象和场景是交互处理的，并且这种交互是由可识别性调节的。此外，可识别性的中介作用因对象和场景识别而异，暗示它们背后的不同处理机制。与其他实验的比较表明，对象和场景识别都受到上下文不一致的干扰。总而言之，研究结果表明，对象和场景是交互处理的，并且这种交互是由可识别性调节的。此外，可识别性的中介作用因对象和场景识别而异，暗示它们背后的不同处理机制。与其他实验的比较表明，对象和场景识别都受到上下文不一致的干扰。总而言之，研究结果表明，对象和场景是交互处理的，并且这种交互是由可识别性调节的。此外，可识别性的中介作用因对象和场景识别而异，暗示它们背后的不同处理机制。