In this paper, we study how the distributional preferences of planners and the public diverge in the context of national infrastructure planning. To do so, we surveyed a sample of 323 planners working at the Swedish Transport Administration and 2,108 members of the Swedish public. The most striking difference is that planners place a relatively higher value on aggregate benefits than the public. Planners also place a significantly higher relative value on infrastructure plans that benefit rail transport compared to the public. It is our contention that planners value aggregate benefits relatively more highly because they have a better understanding of the attribute and because they have internalised the long-standing goal of an economically efficient Swedish transport sector.

在本文中，我们研究了在国家基础设施规划的背景下，规划者和公众的分配偏好如何不同。为此，我们调查了在瑞典交通管理局工作的 323 名规划人员和 2,108 名瑞典公众的样本。最显着的区别是规划者对总收益的重视程度高于公众。与公众相比，规划者对有利于铁路运输的基础设施计划的相对价值也明显更高。我们的论点是，规划者相对较高地重视总收益，因为他们对属性有更好的理解，并且因为他们已经内化了经济高效的瑞典交通部门的长期目标。