There is no lack of tweeting and editorial opinion claiming that scientific publishing—and above all, publishing house-managed peer review—is dead, or at least fatally flawed. Some go so far as to declare that scientific publishing antagonizes scientists: It works against the scientific process and constrains careers because the industry is a machine run by money-grabbing entrepreneurs. I admit that there are problems imposed by the enormous increase in data and the misinformation posted on the Internet, but in my mind, this has sharpened our appreciation of, and piqued the need for, well-run peer-reviewed journals. Needless to say, a constructive and reliable peer review system depends almost entirely on a journal's Editor—which brings me to Terri Grodzicker. Where would we be without Terri?

中文翻译：

---

让日记变得伟大：对特丽·格罗齐克的颂歌

不乏推特和社论声称科学出版——尤其是出版社管理的同行评审——已经死了，或者至少存在致命缺陷。有些人甚至宣称科学出版会激怒科学家：它与科学进程背道而驰并限制职业生涯，因为该行业是由贪财的企业家经营的机器。我承认数据的大量增加和互联网上发布的错误信息带来了一些问题，但在我看来，这加强了我们对运行良好的同行评审期刊的欣赏，并激起了对它们的需求。不用说，一个建设性和可靠的同行评审系统几乎完全取决于期刊的编辑——这让我想到了 Terri Grodzicker。如果没有 Terri，我们会怎样？