This Note argues that Bostock v. Clayton County’s holding under Title VII—anti-LGBT discrimination is sex discrimination—applies under equal-protection analysis. It then combines Bostock with sex-stereotype reasoning to argue that recent laws and policies targeting transgender minors unconstitutionally rely on sex-based stereotypes—including that transgender minors are merely confused.

 

中文翻译：

---

Bostock 之后保护跨性别青年：性别分类、性别刻板印象和平等保护的未来

本说明认为 Bostock 诉克莱顿县案根据第七章的规定——反 LGBT 歧视是性别歧视——适用于平等保护分析。然后，它将Bostock 与性别刻板印象推理相结合，论证近期针对变性未成年人的法律和政策违宪地依赖基于性别的刻板印象——包括变性未成年人只是感到困惑。