当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Earth Syst. Sci. Data
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Global Carbon Budget 2022
Earth System Science Data ( IF 11.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-11-11 , DOI: 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022 Pierre Friedlingstein , Michael O'Sullivan , Matthew W. Jones , Robbie M. Andrew , Luke Gregor , Judith Hauck , Corinne Le Quéré , Ingrid T. Luijkx , Are Olsen , Glen P. Peters , Wouter Peters , Julia Pongratz , Clemens Schwingshackl , Stephen Sitch , Josep G. Canadell , Philippe Ciais , Robert B. Jackson , Simone R. Alin , Ramdane Alkama , Almut Arneth , Vivek K. Arora , Nicholas R. Bates , Meike Becker , Nicolas Bellouin , Henry C. Bittig , Laurent Bopp , Frédéric Chevallier , Louise P. Chini , Margot Cronin , Wiley Evans , Stefanie Falk , Richard A. Feely , Thomas Gasser , Marion Gehlen , Thanos Gkritzalis , Lucas Gloege , Giacomo Grassi , Nicolas Gruber , Özgür Gürses , Ian Harris , Matthew Hefner , Richard A. Houghton , George C. Hurtt , Yosuke Iida , Tatiana Ilyina , Atul K. Jain , Annika Jersild , Koji Kadono , Etsushi Kato , Daniel Kennedy , Kees Klein Goldewijk , Jürgen Knauer , Jan Ivar Korsbakken , Peter Landschützer , Nathalie Lefèvre , Keith Lindsay , Junjie Liu , Zhu Liu , Gregg Marland , Nicolas Mayot , Matthew J. McGrath , Nicolas Metzl , Natalie M. Monacci , David R. Munro , Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka , Yosuke Niwa , Kevin O'Brien , Tsuneo Ono , Paul I. Palmer , Naiqing Pan , Denis Pierrot , Katie Pocock , Benjamin Poulter , Laure Resplandy , Eddy Robertson , Christian Rödenbeck , Carmen Rodriguez , Thais M. Rosan , Jörg Schwinger , Roland Séférian , Jamie D. Shutler , Ingunn Skjelvan , Tobias Steinhoff , Qing Sun , Adrienne J. Sutton , Colm Sweeney , Shintaro Takao , Toste Tanhua , Pieter P. Tans , Xiangjun Tian , Hanqin Tian , Bronte Tilbrook , Hiroyuki Tsujino , Francesco Tubiello , Guido R. van der Werf , Anthony P. Walker , Rik Wanninkhof , Chris Whitehead , Anna Willstrand Wranne , Rebecca Wright , Wenping Yuan , Chao Yue , Xu Yue , Sönke Zaehle , Jiye Zeng , Bo Zheng
Earth System Science Data ( IF 11.4 ) Pub Date : 2022-11-11 , DOI: 10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022 Pierre Friedlingstein , Michael O'Sullivan , Matthew W. Jones , Robbie M. Andrew , Luke Gregor , Judith Hauck , Corinne Le Quéré , Ingrid T. Luijkx , Are Olsen , Glen P. Peters , Wouter Peters , Julia Pongratz , Clemens Schwingshackl , Stephen Sitch , Josep G. Canadell , Philippe Ciais , Robert B. Jackson , Simone R. Alin , Ramdane Alkama , Almut Arneth , Vivek K. Arora , Nicholas R. Bates , Meike Becker , Nicolas Bellouin , Henry C. Bittig , Laurent Bopp , Frédéric Chevallier , Louise P. Chini , Margot Cronin , Wiley Evans , Stefanie Falk , Richard A. Feely , Thomas Gasser , Marion Gehlen , Thanos Gkritzalis , Lucas Gloege , Giacomo Grassi , Nicolas Gruber , Özgür Gürses , Ian Harris , Matthew Hefner , Richard A. Houghton , George C. Hurtt , Yosuke Iida , Tatiana Ilyina , Atul K. Jain , Annika Jersild , Koji Kadono , Etsushi Kato , Daniel Kennedy , Kees Klein Goldewijk , Jürgen Knauer , Jan Ivar Korsbakken , Peter Landschützer , Nathalie Lefèvre , Keith Lindsay , Junjie Liu , Zhu Liu , Gregg Marland , Nicolas Mayot , Matthew J. McGrath , Nicolas Metzl , Natalie M. Monacci , David R. Munro , Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka , Yosuke Niwa , Kevin O'Brien , Tsuneo Ono , Paul I. Palmer , Naiqing Pan , Denis Pierrot , Katie Pocock , Benjamin Poulter , Laure Resplandy , Eddy Robertson , Christian Rödenbeck , Carmen Rodriguez , Thais M. Rosan , Jörg Schwinger , Roland Séférian , Jamie D. Shutler , Ingunn Skjelvan , Tobias Steinhoff , Qing Sun , Adrienne J. Sutton , Colm Sweeney , Shintaro Takao , Toste Tanhua , Pieter P. Tans , Xiangjun Tian , Hanqin Tian , Bronte Tilbrook , Hiroyuki Tsujino , Francesco Tubiello , Guido R. van der Werf , Anthony P. Walker , Rik Wanninkhof , Chris Whitehead , Anna Willstrand Wranne , Rebecca Wright , Wenping Yuan , Chao Yue , Xu Yue , Sönke Zaehle , Jiye Zeng , Bo Zheng
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and
their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere
in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon
cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future
climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodologies to
quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their
uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy
statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change
(ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change
data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured
directly, and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual
changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated
with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based
data products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) is estimated with
dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance
(BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the
estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a
measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon
cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ.For the year 2021, EFOS increased by 5.1 % relative to 2020, with
fossil emissions at 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and ELUC was 1.1 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission
(including the cement carbonation sink) of 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1
(40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO2). Also, for 2021, GATM was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1 (2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr−1), SOCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1, and SLAND was 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr−1, with a
BIM of −0.6 GtC yr−1 (i.e. the total estimated sources were too low or
sinks were too high). The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over
2021 reached 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2022 suggest an
increase in EFOS relative to 2021 of +1.0 % (0.1 % to 1.9 %)
globally and atmospheric CO2 concentration reaching 417.2 ppm, more
than 50 % above pre-industrial levels (around 278 ppm). Overall, the mean
and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently
estimated over the period 1959–2021, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr−1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal
variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple
approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the
estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the
different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern
extratropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the
strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update
documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global
carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle
compared with previous publications of this data set. The data presented in
this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022b).
中文翻译:
2022 年全球碳预算
准确评估气候变化中人为二氧化碳 (CO 2 ) 排放及其在大气、海洋和陆地生物圈之间的再分配对于更好地了解全球碳循环、支持制定气候政策和预测未来气候变化至关重要。在这里,我们描述和综合了数据集和方法,以量化全球碳预算的五个主要组成部分及其不确定性。化石 CO 2排放量 ( E FOS ) 基于能源统计数据和水泥生产数据,而土地利用变化排放 ( ELUC ),主要是森林砍伐,基于土地利用和土地利用变化数据和簿记模型。大气 CO 2直接测量浓度,并根据浓度的年度变化计算其增长率 ( G ATM )。海洋 CO 2汇 ( S OCEAN ) 使用全球海洋生物地球化学模型和基于观测的数据产品进行估算。陆地 CO 2汇 ( S LAND ) 使用动态全球植被模型进行估计。由此产生的碳收支失衡 ( B IM ),即估算的总排放量与估算的大气、海洋和陆地生物圈变化之间的差异,是对不完善数据和对当代碳循环的理解的衡量。所有不确定性报告为±1 σ。2021 年,E FOS相对于 2020 年增加了 5.1 %,化石排放量为 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr -1(包括水泥碳化汇为 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr -1),而E LUC为1.1 ± 0.7 GtC yr -1,人为 CO 2总排放量(包括水泥碳化汇)为 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr -1 (40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO 2 )。此外,2021 年,G ATM为 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr -1(2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr -1),S OCEAN为 2.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr -1,S LAND为 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr -1, B IM为- 0.6 GtC yr -1(即总估计源太低或水槽太高)。2021 年全球大气 CO 2平均浓度达到 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm。2022 年的初步数据表明,相对于 2021 年,全球和大气 CO2 的E FOS增加+ 1.0 %(0.1 % 至 1.9 %)2浓度达到 417.2 ppm,比工业化前水平(约 278 ppm)高出 50% 以上。总体而言,全球碳预算组成部分的平均值和趋势在 1959 年至 2021 年期间始终得到估计,但在表示 CO 2通量的年度至半年代际变化时,仍然存在高达 1 GtC yr -1的差异。对多种方法和观测的估计值的比较表明:(1) 土地利用变化排放的估计值持续存在很大的不确定性,(2) 不同方法之间对土地 CO 2量级的一致性较低北温带的通量,以及(3)在过去十年中,不同方法对海洋下沉强度的差异。本次实时数据更新记录了新的全球碳预算中使用的方法和数据集的变化,以及与该数据集之前的出版物相比,在理解全球碳循环方面取得的进展。这项工作中提供的数据可在 https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 获得(Friedlingstein 等人,2022b)。
更新日期:2022-11-12
中文翻译:
2022 年全球碳预算
准确评估气候变化中人为二氧化碳 (CO 2 ) 排放及其在大气、海洋和陆地生物圈之间的再分配对于更好地了解全球碳循环、支持制定气候政策和预测未来气候变化至关重要。在这里,我们描述和综合了数据集和方法,以量化全球碳预算的五个主要组成部分及其不确定性。化石 CO 2排放量 ( E FOS ) 基于能源统计数据和水泥生产数据,而土地利用变化排放 ( ELUC ),主要是森林砍伐,基于土地利用和土地利用变化数据和簿记模型。大气 CO 2直接测量浓度,并根据浓度的年度变化计算其增长率 ( G ATM )。海洋 CO 2汇 ( S OCEAN ) 使用全球海洋生物地球化学模型和基于观测的数据产品进行估算。陆地 CO 2汇 ( S LAND ) 使用动态全球植被模型进行估计。由此产生的碳收支失衡 ( B IM ),即估算的总排放量与估算的大气、海洋和陆地生物圈变化之间的差异,是对不完善数据和对当代碳循环的理解的衡量。所有不确定性报告为±1 σ。2021 年,E FOS相对于 2020 年增加了 5.1 %,化石排放量为 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr -1(包括水泥碳化汇为 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr -1),而E LUC为1.1 ± 0.7 GtC yr -1,人为 CO 2总排放量(包括水泥碳化汇)为 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr -1 (40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO 2 )。此外,2021 年,G ATM为 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr -1(2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr -1),S OCEAN为 2.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr -1,S LAND为 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr -1, B IM为- 0.6 GtC yr -1(即总估计源太低或水槽太高)。2021 年全球大气 CO 2平均浓度达到 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm。2022 年的初步数据表明,相对于 2021 年,全球和大气 CO2 的E FOS增加+ 1.0 %(0.1 % 至 1.9 %)2浓度达到 417.2 ppm,比工业化前水平(约 278 ppm)高出 50% 以上。总体而言,全球碳预算组成部分的平均值和趋势在 1959 年至 2021 年期间始终得到估计,但在表示 CO 2通量的年度至半年代际变化时,仍然存在高达 1 GtC yr -1的差异。对多种方法和观测的估计值的比较表明:(1) 土地利用变化排放的估计值持续存在很大的不确定性,(2) 不同方法之间对土地 CO 2量级的一致性较低北温带的通量,以及(3)在过去十年中,不同方法对海洋下沉强度的差异。本次实时数据更新记录了新的全球碳预算中使用的方法和数据集的变化,以及与该数据集之前的出版物相比,在理解全球碳循环方面取得的进展。这项工作中提供的数据可在 https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 获得(Friedlingstein 等人,2022b)。