当前位置: X-MOL 学术Philosophical Studies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Handling rejection
Philosophical Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-07 , DOI: 10.1007/s11098-022-01884-5
Derek Baker, Jack Woods

This paper has two related goals. First, we develop an expressivist account of negation which, in the spirit of Alan Gibbard, treats disagreement as semantically primitive. Our second goal is to make progress toward a unified expressivist treatment of modality. Metaethical expressivists must be expressivists about deontic modal claims. But then metaethical expressivists must either extend their expressivism to include epistemic and alethic modals, or else accept a semantics for modal expressions that is radically disjunctive. We propose that expressivists look to Amie Thomasson’s work for a general strategy for offering a unified expressivist account of modality. Modals in general, we propose, are devices for expressing metalinguistic commitments within the object language, with deontic, epistemic, and metaphysical modals all expressing different kinds of metalinguistic commitments.



中文翻译:

处理拒绝

本文有两个相关的目标。首先,我们发展了一种表达主义的否定解释,本着 Alan Gibbard 的精神,将分歧视为语义上的原始。我们的第二个目标是朝着对模态的统一表现主义处理取得进展。元伦理表现主义者必须是关于道义模态主张的表现主义者。但是,元伦理表现主义者必须要么扩展他们的表现主义,以包括认知模态和伦理模态,要么接受完全分离的模态表达的语义。我们建议表现主义者从艾米·托马森的作品中寻找一种总体策略,以提供对模态的统一表现主义说明。我们建议,一般来说,模态是在对象语言中表达元语言承诺的工具,具有道义的、认知的、

更新日期:2022-10-07
down
wechat
bug